Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Near Miss of the Day 192: This time it's poor cycling, not driving

Our regular feature highlighting close passes caught on camera from around the country – today it’s Greater Manchester

Today's featured video in our Near Miss of the Day series is a bit different - it shows poor cycling, rather than bad driving.

It was filmed last Sunday on the Trans Pennine Trail at Durham Massey near Altrincham, Greater Manchester, by road.cc reader Bob.

He told us: "Here is a video of the type of cyclists that get us all a bad name.

"My wife and myself had pulled over to the right to pass some oncoming pedestrians (with a pram), then two “cyclists” undertook us, the second one barely got through the gap."

The Trans Pennine Trail forms part of the National Cycle Network, which is developed and managed by Sustrans.

The Bristol-based charity regularly stresses that where routes are shared between cyclists and pedestrians, it is the latter who have priority, and that bike riders should cut their speed accordingly.

> Near Miss of the Day turns 100 - Why do we do the feature and what have we learnt from it?

Over the years road.cc has reported on literally hundreds of close passes and near misses involving badly driven vehicles from every corner of the country – so many, in fact, that we’ve decided to turn the phenomenon into a regular feature on the site. One day hopefully we will run out of close passes and near misses to report on, but until that happy day arrives, Near Miss of the Day will keep rolling on.

If you’ve caught on camera a close encounter of the uncomfortable kind with another road user that you’d like to share with the wider cycling community please send it to us at info [at] road.cc or send us a message via the road.cc Facebook page.

If the video is on YouTube, please send us a link, if not we can add any footage you supply to our YouTube channel as an unlisted video (so it won't show up on searches).

Please also let us know whether you contacted the police and if so what their reaction was, as well as the reaction of the vehicle operator if it was a bus, lorry or van with company markings etc.

> What to do if you capture a near miss or close pass (or worse) on camera while cycling

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

26 comments

Avatar
Kapelmuur | 6 years ago
0 likes

I don’t understand why anyone who wants to get a move on would ride the TPT when there are quiet roads linking the same places - Altrincham, Lymm, Warrington.

Not only is the surface bad, it turns into a stream in places during wet weather. It’s fine for pootling along, admiring people’s dogs and encouraging small children as they are being taken for a ride on their new bikes but it’s not suitable for speed.

Avatar
CygnusX1 replied to Kapelmuur | 6 years ago
1 like
Kapelmuur wrote:

I don’t understand why anyone who wants to get a move on would ride the TPT when there are quiet roads linking the same places - Altrincham, Lymm, Warrington.

Have you ridden those roads recently? Massive potholes (although someone has painted around some of the larger ones recently) gravel and mud, and deformed / subsided shoulders.

Avatar
Kapelmuur replied to CygnusX1 | 6 years ago
1 like

CygnusX1 wrote:
Kapelmuur wrote:

I don’t understand why anyone who wants to get a move on would ride the TPT when there are quiet roads linking the same places - Altrincham, Lymm, Warrington.

Have you ridden those roads recently? Massive potholes (although someone has painted around some of the larger ones recently) gravel and mud, and deformed / subsided shoulders.

Once or twice a week. The surface is better than the TPT and there’s no one with dogs on extendable leads.

Avatar
MrGear | 6 years ago
1 like

The worst thing about that undertake was the pointlessness of it... They had to stop at the gate seconds after the pass.

Avatar
Kendalred | 6 years ago
1 like

Point of order - Dunham Massey, not Durham.

Thank you. Mr P Edant.

Avatar
vonhelmet | 6 years ago
2 likes

Dogs on shared use paths are the bane of my commute. Rule 56 of the Highway Code says to keep dogs on a short lead... yeah, right. I get dogs ambling all over the shop or bounding out of the undergrowth unannounced. It’s a nightmare.

Avatar
Greeneyelevin replied to vonhelmet | 6 years ago
0 likes

vonhelmet wrote:

Dogs on shared use paths are the bane of my commute. Rule 56 of the Highway Code says to keep dogs on a short lead... yeah, right. I get dogs ambling all over the shop or bounding out of the undergrowth unannounced. It’s a nightmare.

I'm a cyclist & a dog walker and on the occasions I'm out with the dog I've never heard a cyclist use their bell or call out to warn me of their approach!

It's simple courtesey & why do so many people 'fear' interaction with others....?

Cyclist's need to make their presence known, especially if approaching from behind with 15-20 mph closing speeds.

Used your heads, give the walkers a chance.....

Avatar
vonhelmet replied to Greeneyelevin | 6 years ago
3 likes

Greeneyelevin wrote:

vonhelmet wrote:

Dogs on shared use paths are the bane of my commute. Rule 56 of the Highway Code says to keep dogs on a short lead... yeah, right. I get dogs ambling all over the shop or bounding out of the undergrowth unannounced. It’s a nightmare.

I'm a cyclist & a dog walker and on the occasions I'm out with the dog I've never heard a cyclist use their bell or call out to warn me of their approach!

It's simple courtesey & why do so many people 'fear' interaction with others....?

Cyclist's need to make their presence known, especially if approaching from behind with 15-20 mph closing speeds.

Used your heads, give the walkers a chance.....

I don’t have a bell (come at me bro), but I’m always shouting to let people know I’m there. That’s still no help if someone’s idiot dog comes bounding out of the trees straight into the path. I tend to assume that any person on the path probably has a dog, so as soon as I see someone I’m looking for the dog, but if people actually took responsibility for their animals I wouldn’t have to be quite so fearful that I’m going to get t-boned by some stupid mutt appearing from nowhere. I don’t mind dogs off leads if they have some sense. Some dogs aren’t at all phased by me and just keep on with their thing, or in a lot of cases the owners will go to their dog and keep it in place as I pass. It’s the unpredictable dogs with no brains that need to be kept on a short leash. I got chased down a path the other week by some stupid lolloping Labrador while the owner shouted “He never does this!” as though that was any help to anyone.

Avatar
davel replied to vonhelmet | 6 years ago
2 likes

vonhelmet wrote:

Greeneyelevin wrote:

vonhelmet wrote:

Dogs on shared use paths are the bane of my commute. Rule 56 of the Highway Code says to keep dogs on a short lead... yeah, right. I get dogs ambling all over the shop or bounding out of the undergrowth unannounced. It’s a nightmare.

I'm a cyclist & a dog walker and on the occasions I'm out with the dog I've never heard a cyclist use their bell or call out to warn me of their approach!

It's simple courtesey & why do so many people 'fear' interaction with others....?

Cyclist's need to make their presence known, especially if approaching from behind with 15-20 mph closing speeds.

Used your heads, give the walkers a chance.....

I don’t have a bell (come at me bro), but I’m always shouting to let people know I’m there. That’s still no help if someone’s idiot dog comes bounding out of the trees straight into the path. I tend to assume that any person on the path probably has a dog, so as soon as I see someone I’m looking for the dog, but if people actually took responsibility for their animals I wouldn’t have to be quite so fearful that I’m going to get t-boned by some stupid mutt appearing from nowhere. I don’t mind dogs off leads if they have some sense. Some dogs aren’t at all phased by me and just keep on with their thing, or in a lot of cases the owners will go to their dog and keep it in place as I pass. It’s the unpredictable dogs with no brains that need to be kept on a short leash. I got chased down a path the other week by some stupid lolloping Labrador while the owner shouted “He never does this!” as though that was any help to anyone.

I really hate it when I'm out running. I've had proper rows with people who come out with stuff like 'it's OK - he's friendly' from 50 yards away, while something doing a great impression of a pet psycho charges at my ankles.

Avatar
Argos74 | 6 years ago
2 likes

I rode that way a couple of weeks ago, Manchester to Widnes and back. Plenty of leisurely riders, runners, dog walkers, kids on bikes, people out for a leisurely stroll.  Some open stretches where you can open up and have some fun. Lots more opportunities to ease off and give a friendly wave or hi. No need atall to be an arsehole.

Avatar
Derk Davies | 6 years ago
2 likes

Surely the pedestrians/riders should all keep left then there's far less chance of anything like this happening. Also the lady never looked over her shoulder before moving to the right (the lifesaver), I thought that was ingrained in every cyclist? If her or her husband had done this while approaching the pedestrians they could have signaled to the fast riders behind which might of helped the situation.

All reminds me very much of riding around the Forest of dean. Just people not thinking of anyone else or thier own safety (or even saying "hi" as they pass). Just because your not on a road dosn't mean you don't have to be aware of whats happening around you.

Avatar
HoarseMann replied to Derk Davies | 6 years ago
7 likes

Tim K wrote:

Surely the pedestrians/riders should all keep left then there's far less chance of anything like this happening. Also the lady never looked over her shoulder before moving to the right (the lifesaver), I thought that was ingrained in every cyclist? If her or her husband had done this while approaching the pedestrians they could have signaled to the fast riders behind which might of helped the situation.

All reminds me very much of riding around the Forest of dean. Just people not thinking of anyone else or thier own safety (or even saying "hi" as they pass). Just because your not on a road dosn't mean you don't have to be aware of whats happening around you.

It’s a narrow mixed used path with a poor surface, expect dogs/peds/bikes all over the place. If there were some lane discipline on a path like this, then pedestrians are instructed to keep right so they can see oncoming traffic. So actually, everyone except the overtaking cyclists were behaving correctly.

It’s always the responsibility of the overtaking vehicle to ensure the manoeuvre is safe. On these sort of paths you have to be prepared to slow or stop if necessary.

As for the FoD, I've never come across pedestrians on the downhill runs when I’ve done an uplift day. But on the mixed trails you've just got to accept that you might have to slow down. People go there for a relaxing walk in the forest, they don’t want (nor should) feel like they've got to keep to the edge of the path like they’re walking down a motorway. A noisy free hub helps, but sometimes I have to slow to a walking pace and ask politely if I can pass (which usually has the effect of some diving to the right, some to the left and some freezing in the middle like they’re about to be hit by a train!).

Avatar
Derk Davies replied to HoarseMann | 6 years ago
1 like

HoarseMann wrote:

Tim K wrote:

Surely the pedestrians/riders should all keep left then there's far less chance of anything like this happening. Also the lady never looked over her shoulder before moving to the right (the lifesaver), I thought that was ingrained in every cyclist? If her or her husband had done this while approaching the pedestrians they could have signaled to the fast riders behind which might of helped the situation.

All reminds me very much of riding around the Forest of dean. Just people not thinking of anyone else or thier own safety (or even saying "hi" as they pass). Just because your not on a road dosn't mean you don't have to be aware of whats happening around you.

It’s a narrow mixed used path with a poor surface, expect dogs/peds/bikes all over the place. If there were some lane discipline on a path like this, then pedestrians are instructed to keep right so they can see oncoming traffic. So actually, everyone except the overtaking cyclists were behaving correctly. It’s always the responsibility of the overtaking vehicle to ensure the manoeuvre is safe. On these sort of paths you have to be prepared to slow or stop if necessary. As for the FoD, I've never come across pedestrians on the downhill runs when I’ve done an uplift day. But on the mixed trails you've just got to accept that you might have to slow down. People go there for a relaxing walk in the forest, they don’t want (nor should) feel like they've got to keep to the edge of the path like they’re walking down a motorway. A noisy free hub helps, but sometimes I have to slow to a walking pace and ask politely if I can pass (which usually has the effect of some diving to the right, some to the left and some freezing in the middle like they’re about to be hit by a train!).

I know what you mean. But people do need to be aware. If the speedy cyclists had been aware they'd have seen the gate ahead and realised there was no point overtaking (sorry, undertaking).

I'm from the forest but now live in Ireland. Over here even the car drivers put their hand up as you ride past but when I was back over the forest for a few days in the summer  it brought back to me how most people wont even make eye contact. Most locals are fine but some people seem to think they are in "the bronx" or something and will get shot if they look at you.

We were always courteous to other people and tried to have respect for everyone. Your right about the left - right - freeze, thats why I always think it easier for everyone to stay left when passing as you are used to on a road. The deer, sheep, dogs and wild boar don't seem to realise this though.

Avatar
HoarseMann replied to Derk Davies | 6 years ago
0 likes

Tim K wrote:

I know what you mean. But people do need to be aware. If the speedy cyclists had been aware they'd have seen the gate ahead and realised there was no point overtaking (sorry, undertaking).

It does seem daft when they get off the bike seconds later to go through a gate.

You are right that some people seem very hostile on these mixed use paths. Most are friendly, but some do give such dirty looks and seem really put out just to be asked courteously to allow a cyclist to pass. It’s almost like they don’t expect (or want?) a bike to be there.

Such a contrast to the relaxed and orderly use of cycling infrastructure I experienced on holiday in France. I had to take a photo of this little roundabout at an intersection of cycle paths, this is how it should be...

 

Avatar
dassie replied to HoarseMann | 6 years ago
4 likes

HoarseMann wrote:

Tim K wrote:

I know what you mean. But people do need to be aware. If the speedy cyclists had been aware they'd have seen the gate ahead and realised there was no point overtaking (sorry, undertaking).

It does seem daft when they get off the bike seconds later to go through a gate.

You are right that some people seem very hostile on these mixed use paths. Most are friendly, but some do give such dirty looks and seem really put out just to be asked courteously to allow a cyclist to pass. It’s almost like they don’t expect (or want?) a bike to be there.

Such a contrast to the relaxed and orderly use of cycling infrastructure I experienced on holiday in France. I had to take a photo of this little roundabout at an intersection of cycle paths, this is how it should be...

 

 

Looks like Australia from that image...

Avatar
HoarseMann replied to dassie | 6 years ago
0 likes

dassie wrote:

Looks like Australia from that image...

Lacanau-Océan. It’s a surf resort and full of chilled out surfer dude types, so maybe that’s got something to do with it! Unnamed Road, 33680 Lacanau, France https://goo.gl/maps/RqNvfGJL3PK2

Avatar
Derk Davies replied to HoarseMann | 6 years ago
1 like

HoarseMann wrote:

Tim K wrote:

I know what you mean. But people do need to be aware. If the speedy cyclists had been aware they'd have seen the gate ahead and realised there was no point overtaking (sorry, undertaking).

It does seem daft when they get off the bike seconds later to go through a gate.

You are right that some people seem very hostile on these mixed use paths. Most are friendly, but some do give such dirty looks and seem really put out just to be asked courteously to allow a cyclist to pass. It’s almost like they don’t expect (or want?) a bike to be there.

Such a contrast to the relaxed and orderly use of cycling infrastructure I experienced on holiday in France. I had to take a photo of this little roundabout at an intersection of cycle paths, this is how it should be...

 

I didn't mean so much "hostile" towards cyclists. I was actually talking more about other cyclists seeming too ignorant to be pleasant. Everyone just needs a bit of respect towards each other. And a bit of common sense can help.

Avatar
Expatpat | 6 years ago
4 likes

If only i had been wearing my GoPro today, i would be submitting 'Near Miss of the Day 193, only this time its a pedestrian'.

Walking along the street some idiot coming towards me didnt move at all and we bumped shoulders. I shouted the standard phrase 'Jeeeeeesus Christ, fucking wanker!' at him but he just strode off.

This sort of behaviour gives us pedestrians a bad name.

Avatar
EK Spinner | 6 years ago
2 likes

inconsiderate selfishness, exactly they same causes as we have on the roads (all be it the consequences can be more severe) these shared use paths definetly require a chilled mindset. When they are ex railway lines they often have long steady gradients as well which can encourage a bit more speed in one direction.

A bugbear of mine is long Strava segments with 22+ mph KoMs on them - almost TT type speeds on narrow paths with kids and dogs - nuts

Avatar
dassie | 6 years ago
7 likes

Seemed like the second hi-vis cyclist was in 'follow-that-person' mode, and putting some of their important decision making thought processes into a dangerous secondary state, especially for a 'dual use' path.  Both 'overtaking' cyclists were probably cycling too quickly for the conditions.

Avatar
vonhelmet | 6 years ago
4 likes

Greater Manchester?!?

*watches video*

Phew, it's not me.

Avatar
Accessibility f... | 6 years ago
12 likes

> "Here is a video of the type of cyclists that get us all a bad name."

They no more give us all a bad name than the drunk driver caught upside down in a ditch.

Mind you, if the authorities actually looked after the TPT at Dunham (which is a former railway), the useable path would be twice as wide.  It's only so narrow because nobody takes care of it.

Avatar
Stef Marazzi | 6 years ago
2 likes

This should be a case study in how not to be a nob on a bike!

Avatar
BehindTheBikesheds | 6 years ago
6 likes

Fucking MGIF selfish bastards, grrrrr. If there had been a child behind the buggy and they'd just stepped a few inches to their left the wankers would have struck them. Wanker moton mentality, this winds me up no end!

Avatar
kil0ran | 6 years ago
10 likes

That is genius.

All the driver behaviours that piss us off on a daily basis in one 20 second clip. Muppets

Avatar
Organon | 6 years ago
5 likes

Why is everyone on their right?!

Latest Comments