- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
news
Alberto Contador press conference (picture - Eurosport).png"Second failed test" for Alberto Contador could spell bad news for TDF champ
Tour de France winner Alberto Contador’s fight to clear his name following his positive test for clenbuterol may be set to become even more difficult than it already was following news that he failed a second drugs test during July’s race.
The claim has been made by The New York Times, which says that a new test, introduced in the Tour de France for the first time this year, had detected traces of plasticizers found in plastic IV bags, suggesting evidence of a blood transfusion.
While that claim had already been made by French sports daily L’Equipe as well as the German TV channel which first uncovered the story, it had been assumed that the plasticizers were contained in the sample taken from Contador at the second rest day in Pau that also showed minute traces of clenbuterol.
Not so, says the New York Times, which quotes “a person with knowledge of the test results” as saying that the plasticizers, at a level eight times higher than the legal limit, have been discovered in a sample taken from the cyclist the previous day.
If it’s true that Contador has recorded a second positive result for a different substance – and, moreover, one for which there is a minimum level that has been well exceeded – that places him in a much more difficult position.
The cyclist has claimed that the clenbuterol found its way into his urine as a result of his having eaten contaminated meat, and given the infinitesimal amount of clenbuterol involved – there is no legal threshold required to test positive for the substance – many have been prepared to give him the benefit of the doubt.
A second failed test would cast doubt on Contador’s protestations of innocence, particularly given the fact that since news broke last week of his positive test for clenbuterol, the Astana rider has maintained that the fact none of the other samples taken from him at the Tour de France have contained traces of anything untoward.
While the test for the presence of plasticizers has been in operation for a year, it is not yet formally validated for use in anti-doping, so an athlete could potentially argue in court that an adverse finding was not valid.
Equally, however, it could be introduced as evidence of doping by prosecutors in support of another positive test, as seems to be the situation in Contador’s case.
“Even without a validated test, it could be looked at in a case-by-case basis,” insisted Francesco Botré, chief of the World Anti-Doping Agency-accredited laboratory in Rome.
“If someone has a very, very high level of plasticizers in the urine, it would be hard for that athlete to explain how that happened if not for doping. If the level is lower, it obviously would make it much harder, but it would still be possible to prove,” he added.
Jacinto Vidarte, Contador’s press agent, told The New York Times yesterday that the 27-year old “has done nothing illegal,” and that he denied involvement in blood transfusions.
He also pointed out that “There has been no official confirmation at all,” regarding last week’s reports that traces of plastcizer had been found in Contador’s urine.
Bernhard Kohl, who finished third in the 2008 Tour de France but was subsequently disqualified after failing a drugs test, told The New York Times: “It’s impossible to win the Tour de France without doping.”
The Austrian, who is speaking at the United States Anti-Doping Agency’s science conference, added that he believes most top riders undergo transfusions of their own blood as well as currently undetectable substances such as variants of EPO
“I was tested 200 times during my career, and 100 times I had drugs in my body,” Kohl pointed out. “I was caught, but 99 other times, I wasn’t. Riders think they can get away with doping because most of the time they do,” he added.
“Even if there is a new test for blood doping, I’m not even sure it will scare riders into stopping. The problem is just that bad,” Kohl concluded.
Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.
Latest Comments
- ktache 5 hours 51 min ago
The small frame, the aggressive posture, lots of standover height.
- mctrials23 6 hours 46 min ago
As i've said before, the police should be sued for a lot of money when someone they have knowingly ignored has gone on to commit a serious crime....
- David9694 6 hours 54 min ago
'Bad parking' blocks firefighters multiple times on same emergency call-out...
- David9694 6 hours 58 min ago
Cambridgeshire boy, 13, crashes Audi into garden wall after taking it from home...
- Adam Sutton 7 hours 43 min ago
Good stuff. Now do it on cycleway C9 through Hammersmith to Chiswick.
- mark1a 7 hours 53 min ago
It's technically allowed but it's not known as "London's Orbital Car Park" for nothing.
- Dogless 9 hours 1 min ago
You're defending bombing hospitals and refugee camps and starving children.
- mattw 11 hours 41 min ago
Used car salesman is a complete attention-seeking plank....
- tubasti 11 hours 58 min ago
I don't know if they're any better, but they's certainly become more boring.
- FionaJJ 12 hours 24 min ago
At risk of being cynical, and stereotyping the police, it's so they don't have to leave the comfort of their panda cars and pursue on foot when...
Add new comment
25 comments
A positive testing for a banned substance IS proof that he is guilty!
Will have to wait until UCI decide to take action regardless of media.
Disappointed now that non cyclists will look down on roadriding but Contador is innocent till proven guilty.
If this latest test result is true then it makes the UCI look particularly bad for trying to keep the whole thing under wraps. It also makes you wonder how Contador got his head out of the puerto noose.
I despair, I really do. I have two step sons that I have managed to convert from Football to Cycling with one of them moving from 4th Cat to 2nd Cat in this his first season. I am however at a loss to explain these news items that we all believed were behind us. Why does it continue to happen. Are the tests becoming so complex in depth that they are picking up something that actually exists innocently or are the alleged culprits truly cheating: Let's face it, if they are using illegal substances then are cheating. But, why do we continue to find professional cyclists apparently resorting to these tactics. Is it greed or is it the sheer pressures of modern day cycle racing?
I don't believe that it's greed. There really isn't enough of a reward to justify this. My guess is that the pressure and strains of the todays calendars are placing potentially unrealistic strains on the riders.
We spend absolute fortunes on taking the capabilities of our machines to the absolute extremes yet the human body remains what it has always been. Sure, we are far better educated in how we treat our bodies: we know what to eat and when to eat to maximise the benefits but they all have limitations. Physiologically we, mankind, have our limits: there is no SuperMan: And yet we, and the media, constantly strive to create just such a being.
I have seen suggestions that maybe the tour season is too arduous and that there should be just one 3-week tour with the others reduced to a maximum of two. Maybe, just maybe there mileage in exploring this. What I do know however, is that something has to be done to eradicate cheats. If they were isolated cases, we could deal with it the way we are today, but as we stand, we cannot just rely on Deter, Detect and Deny, we must try to analyse the Why. Why do so many people still resort to cheating, if they are of course, when the chances of being caught is almost guaranteed? Are they really that stupid?
I could go on but I'm just so pissed off with the whole affair. I love cycling: I love the fact that my two boys have taken to cycling in such a big way (even though it's cost me a small fortune). But, I hate cheats. I also hate witch-hunts. If somebody has cheated, deal with them (no cheat should be allowed back to professional cycling) but let's not turn the whole thing into a media circus, it's screwing the image of our sport.
But lets also look at the system: The testing system and the cycling system.
I apologise for any typos: They are there to test observation skills.
Rant over
I'm off for a ride now.
we're a typo haven here at road.cc, JTC, as anyone who read my recent news story on the FSA Metron 'TT shiter' will attest
yeah, or he didn't remove it from the polystyrene tray before sticking it in the microwave
maybe he ate the packet it came in too
Chapeau Simon & Road.cc: That snoring sound is from the varied velo-mags across the pond. However, I now see velonation & cycling news with the news as well.
Had David Walsh commented about this, yet? Might be time for a 1-1 with him, Pierre and/or LeMond to get their take on the latest events.
~BD
Hi,
I'm sure that this has probably been said loads of time in various places but I thought I'd add my comments:
Have we reached a stage whereby the tests for doping are so 'sensitive' than any number of legitimate reasons could explain the presence of tiny ammounts of banned substances within an athlete's samples? Are these tests now becoming counter-productive in that it's a case of 'guilty until proven innoncent', and that this process all takes place in the public eye? All the time that this is taking place the image of professional cycling is being damaged.
That said (and I'm probably contradicting myself a bit here) if a rider is found to be undisputably guilty of doping - the ban needs to be for life not just 2 years, and this should extend to any involvement within professional cycling as a sport - not just as a rider. A 2 year ban does not represent a suitable deterrant in my opinion. However, the evidence needs to be solid before someone's career can be ruined.
I sincerely hope that Contador is not guilty, although I am a Schleck fan - I think that this whole episode is damaging our sport.
That's it!
-Gordon
Remember kids: Dont Do Drugs!
(that is of course unless it is completely undetectable, then you can do what the hell you want)
I thought the concensus within the 'cycling community' was that all TdF riders are on something. Am I being overly cycnical? Completing the Tour is quite an accomplishment - even with a little pharmaceutical enhancement.
and maybe not just Spanish cycling
do tell?
you can pm me through the site.
Well maybe Bjarne could talk to him with a knowing smile?
Would that be a smile with 60% curvature?
If this does turn out to be true, he should be a man about it and fess up.
Poor old Andy Schleck having his possible glory taken away from a possible cheat(who I still believe was underhand when Schlecks chain came off).
That is of course assuming that Schleck and others in the peleton aren't doping.
Plus how can Kohl come out with a statement of "Its impossible to win the tour without doping" That has got to be a load of bull. If the doping really is that bad and that underhand then the only people to blame are the UCI and the anti-doping bodies who perhaps need to have a high profile case to fear into ALL riders!!!
well surely this could be explained by old bertie eating a large quantity or processed cheese or anything other with a plasticky nature.
"United States Anti-Soping Agency’s"
I support their anti soap policies!
My colleagues don't support my support for anti soap polices however
Meanwhile, on topic...
Poor old Bjarne Riis, what is he to do?
Ouch ouch ouch.
Spanish cycling is in a real mess.
might not be so nice now you've altered them
You can see where the typos in my blog come from can't you !!!
If this is true, then all those hugs and smiles from Albuterol Clentrador are now explained. Safe in the knowledge he was doped and undetectable. Until now. Oops.
have altered Bikeradar forumites
they are a nice bunch.
Eek! They're already strange
So how does one explain excessive levels of plasticizer in the blood? It's not looking good for him. I didn't set much store by his 'tainted beef' story anyway, it smacks of all those pathetic excuses riders have used in the past.
Not sure if it has been mentioned here yet but Joe Papp's twitter is worth a look, particularly in relation to this subject.
At least the racing at the Worlds - both women's and men's - was exciting (and hopefully clean) and reminds us of what this sport should be about.
Well done Road C.C. you're ahead of the others with this one (others being popular cycling mags).