Jack has been writing about cycling and multisport for over a decade, arriving at road.cc via 220 Triathlon Magazine in 2017. He worked across all areas of the website including tech, news and video, and also contributed to eBikeTips before being named Editor of road.cc in 2021 (much to his surprise). Jack has been hooked on cycling since his student days, and currently has a Trek 1.2 for winter riding, a beloved Bickerton folding bike for getting around town and an extra beloved custom Ridley Helium SLX for fantasising about going fast in his stable. Jack has never won a bike race, but does have a master's degree in print journalism and two Guinness World Records for pogo sticking (it's a long story).
Add new comment
16 comments
"What else could we blanket ban to improve safety? Pop your stupidest ideas in the comments"
blankets.
I took a peek at C5's website, very revealing, and I trust they will be getting an avalanche of complaints after it's aired.
From the Channel 5 website:
“Hello and welcome to the Channel 5 Programming pages
What we DO want are programmes that are engaging, intelligent, well made and have a relevance to the viewer.
We particularly like factual shows – Specialist Factual, Documentaries and Factual Entertainment. These can be poppy, tabloid type shows or serious pieces, there’s room for all tones and textures. But they need to have a good, grabby title.
Ben Frow
Director of Programming”
And “The Independent Producers Handbook aims to give helpful and practical guidance to all our programme-makers and editorial staff on the Ofcom Broadcasting Code rules and the main areas of law that apply to the making and broadcast of programmes.”
The Ofcom Broadcasting Code has quite a few sections, including:
“Section two: Harm and offence
This section outlines standards for broadcast content so as to provide adequate protection for members of the public from harmful and/or offensive material.
Section three: Crime, disorder, hatred and abuse
This section of the Code covers material that is likely to incite crime or disorder, reflecting Ofcom’s duty to prohibit the broadcast of this type of programming.
Section five: Due impartiality and due accuracy
To ensure that news, in whatever form, is reported with due accuracy and presented with due impartiality.”
https://www.ofcom.org.uk/tv-radio-and-on-demand/broadcast-codes/broadcas...
In his several interviews Mike Teunissen does seem like a charming young man.
I hesitate to ask, for fear of looking stupid, but is that a real rule/thing?
Yes, I believe so. I believe the rationale is to prevent socks being used to aid performance via muscle compression and/or aerodynamics.
https://www.cyclingweekly.com/news/racing/check-illegal-socks-reaction-u...
Wow. Well, OK then...
i'm surprised they're using a mechanical device in this day and age. I'd have though an internet*-enabled laser device with an app would be better able to take into account variables such as fabric stretch, rate of droop over time at different altitudes, fibia:tibia:sock ratios both lengthwise and circumference, change in ratios resulting from dehydration and vein bulging, etc. It's a complex matter.
Or they could just blanket ban socks and insist that pro cyclists paint their ankles instead.
*I mean, we all like net stockings, don't we...?
Reading the Guardian article account of that program also furthers my deep loathing of black-cab drivers. As if listening to LBC doesn't do that enough.
Cockroaches.
We should cut their brake lines and drop bricks through the windscreens ... just a bit of bantzSugar in the fuel tank totally acceptable however!
I never got a reply from CH5 nor OFCOM, despicable bags o shite!
The trouble with complaining about that C5 bilge, is that I don't feel I could complain without first watching it and (a) doing so would make me want to smash my TV and (b) I don't have a TV (haven't had one for nearly 20 years now). So I'd have to buy a TV, and a licence, just in order to annoy myself and smash the thing.
Ofcom accept complaints after airing. Pre complaints could goto
viewerenquiries [at] channel5.com
They will get improved ad revenue from this irresponsible crap. Hopefully OfCom will pull the series. Please do complain.
Very well done to Ian Walker!
It's more than a bit mental if you think about it, more superhuman!
.. 230 miles a day (average) for 16 days straight!
Which is 45% further than the Tour de France covers this year in 23 days.
Chapeau indeed!
To be fair to channel 5 I understand their running a follow up show next week called. “British motorists, ISIS terrorists ? Who’s side are you on ?”
They’ve spent 5 mins on YouTube and realise that there’s is enough death and destruction caused by motorists for 300 seasons.
Well done Dr Walker!
Thats not a raleigh chopper , its a Tomahawk!