A change to pothole repair contracts in England reclassifies smaller holes as non-urgent

In Gwynedd at present and I have to say of the road I've been on around here over the last fortnight, I have not seen one pothole worthy of the name. I've pedalled about 150 miles in that time and it wasn't until I hit Rhyd-Ddu did I find any. At home in the potteries it's very difficult to ride anywhere without coming across any..

jeez i wonder how they manage to do it in the Alps - there roads are bloody pristine compared to ours and they have proper summers AND harsh winters every year.

dunno about your areas, but D&G is really really bad up here in Scotland !
sigh.

Look on the bright side - it will slow cars down and if we are constantly weaving round potholes they'll leave more room when they pass.....maybe

There's a simple solution - just ban road bikes and sell only full suspension MTBs then there can be no complaints.

Meanwhile all cycles and motorcycles are at severe risk - complain loudly to your local authority and with a bit of luck you will have a claim if you fall into one

I have not really perfected the road bike bunny hop. Think I'll need to as I ride a very aggressive position with the bars around 8 inches below the seat. Any tips and what about the strain on all carbon forks?

Meh. I don't remember ever riding on Britain's trunk road network. Certainly not the English Highways Agency bits.

Passed around (thankfully) a chasm on my evening ride last night on Collendean Lane near Horley that has been there so long now plants are beginning to grow in it...

if money has to be saved when will the stuff you reviewed to fill potholes permanently be used. I was impressed with the write up, a cyclists dream product.

Quote:

“Under our new contracts, for the first time, there are mandatory requirements that potholes wider than 15 cm (6 inches) diameter, or deeper than 4cm (1.5 inches) or deeper than the road surface thickness, should always be rectified within 24 hours of verification,” he said.

Within 24 hours of verification? So, if they don't verify it for 3 years, then they're still within minimum standards?

Given the state of some of the roads around me (plenty of them on this weekends olympic tester), it's daft. It doesn't take something as deep as 1.5" at speed on a road bike to easily trash the front wheel, or cause a tyre to blow, but that's a minimum, but agreed, a car could easily roll over that.

But, the difference is, if I want to avoid that and there's a car rapidly approaching, or overtaking, what do I do?

I know there's a need to save money, and I'm fully supportive of that, but given some of the appalling resurfacing decisions recently that were not necessary (between esher and cobham, between fetcham and stoke d'abernon), there's clearly a disjointed approach to spending on road maintenance.