Melbourne urban planners are considering a two-kilometre elevated cycle path, running alongside an existing railway viaduct, similar to plans that were showcased for a network in London.
Here's a video explaining it better than we ever could:
According the the Australian blog The Urbanist: "Elevation isn’t strictly necessary – that’s just a way of providing a freeway-like bicycle path (segregated, limited-access) in a location where retro-fitting infrastructure is hard. Elevation offers advantages though.
"If the path can be hung off an existing rail line, or erected on columns like a monorail, it’ll have no steep hills, no cars or intersections, and (possibly) no pedestrians with dogs. It’s really just another way of separating cyclists from traffic.
"But there are issues. One is the impact on the streetscape. Bicycle paths need to be reasonably wide so in some circumstances they’ll exacerbate the visual impact of existing rail lines and affect the privacy of adjoining uses."
The blog also points out that a conservative estimate of cost would be around £38m per km, much more than painting a few white lines on a road and letting people get on with it.
But the article's author writes: "Cycling will only be viable in the foreseeable future if it creates a dense network of safe cycle routes. The only way that could realistically be achieved is by converting road space to cycling."
The reason for this, he says, is a need for cyclists to have flexibility about where they ride, and a segregated elevated route would limit that.
He says: "Cyclists don’t cover such long distances and easy, direct access to main routes is extraordinarily important – limiting access would have a significant negative effect.
"There are certainly trunk routes that attract a lot of cyclists, especially for commuting, so they require high capacity, but what’s needed is something in the nature of a road dedicated to cycling rather than something as elaborate as a freeway."
The SkyCycle route in London are being proposed with a per-journey charge of around £1. Would you be prepared to pay for segregated cycleways, even if they didn't take you exactly where you wanted to go? Let us know in the comments below.
Help us to fund our site
We’ve noticed you’re using an ad blocker. If you like road.cc, but you don’t like ads, please consider subscribing to the site to support us directly. As a subscriber you can read road.cc ad-free, from as little as £1.99.
If you don’t want to subscribe, please turn your ad blocker off. The revenue from adverts helps to fund our site.
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £1.99. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
You could argue the same about running at one point. People out in their short shorts, skin tight tops and fancy running shoes, but (in my opinion)...
Wasn't it "bizarrely put away for years for quite rightly shouting in alarm at someone riding on the pavement"? At least that's what two (?)...
Hmm - I wonder what that offensive sticker was...?
How are they going to fit this AND a Classified hub to WVA's bike?
I managed to get the smart features to work OK with Android, but once I'd done some initial setup I never really used the app again. It all felt a...
Well me for one and plenty of mates. I've got an original Cervelo R3SL, it's 13 years old and I don't really see any reason to 'upgrade'. Why...
Surely the met office should be issuing a blizzard warning?
Dwars Door Vlaanderen will be interesting. Today we find out whether Pidcock and/or Alaphilippe can do something in De Ronde....
The review above pretty much mirrors my own experience of the A1R0evo. It's a super fast riding bike and I find it as comfortable, if not more...
but it blends perfectly into the fence, which will not need to be removed, so visually no change.