Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Cyclist casualties in Scotland up 19 percent since 2004-2008, 9 percent year on year,

It's a bad time to be a cyclist North of the border...

Last year was a more dangerous year than 2011 to be a Scottish cyclist, official figures published on Tuesday reveal. Cyclist casualties in Scotland increased by 9 percent and there were 9 cyclist deaths, 2 more than in 2011.

The latest Statistical Bulletin from Transport Scotland says:

“There were 898 pedal cyclist casualties recorded in 2012, 9 per cent more than in 2011. 167 (19% and an increase of 7% on 2011) were seriously injured and  9 died (two more than in 2011).

The report suggests that the increased number of cyclists on the roads is a factor in the increase in casualties.

“There are now more cyclists on the roads which will impact on cycling casualty numbers with numbers increasing by around 30 per cent in the last ten years, as  shown by the National Travel Survey and Traffic estimates published in Scottish Transport Statistics.”

19 percent increase since 2004-8

A poster on the CityCycling Edinburgh forum, Instography, pointed out that the 9 percent increase is “the least bad figure they could have used.”

A comparison with the average between 2004 and 2008 “shows a 19% increase in killed or seriously injured. Or a 34% increase in the numbers KSI on non-built-up roads.”

Responding to the increase, Scottish cyclists’ rights organisation Pedal on Parliament said: “We are saddened but not surprised by the latest data on safety on Scotland’s roads, which indicates that while casualties for drivers and passengers have fallen, those for pedestrians and cyclists have risen.

“This data shows clearly that vulnerable road users continue to be at risk.

“It may be that the rates are increasing because the number of cyclists and miles cycled is increasing, but this should not be an excuse for complacency on the part of the government. Rather, it should indicate the need to improve safety on Scotland’s roads as they seek to encourage and support active travel.

“This will require more than a ‘mutual respect’ campaign. It requires the government to take responsibility and act.”


John has been writing about bikes and cycling for over 30 years since discovering that people were mug enough to pay him for it rather than expecting him to do an honest day's work.

He was heavily involved in the mountain bike boom of the late 1980s as a racer, team manager and race promoter, and that led to writing for Mountain Biking UK magazine shortly after its inception. He got the gig by phoning up the editor and telling him the magazine was rubbish and he could do better. Rather than telling him to get lost, MBUK editor Tym Manley called John’s bluff and the rest is history.

Since then he has worked on MTB Pro magazine and was editor of Maximum Mountain Bike and Australian Mountain Bike magazines, before switching to the web in 2000 to work for Along with founder Tony Farrelly, John was on the launch team for and subsequently became editor in chief of Future Publishing’s group of cycling magazines and websites, including Cycling Plus, MBUK, What Mountain Bike and Procycling.

John has also written for Cyclist magazine, edited the BikeMagic website and was founding editor of before handing over to someone far more representative of the site's main audience.

He joined in 2013. He lives in Cambridge where the lack of hills is more than made up for by the headwinds.

Add new comment


a_to_the_j | 10 years ago

figures could be because they are so keen on promoting cycling in the region to gain the tourist coin, but not actually investing in "safer" roads for cycling on, for tourists and especially commuters,
These back "country" roads we are forced to use because super busy main A roads have no cycle paths or any kind of forthcoming investment/planning new cycle paths along these routes.
Narrow, unlit, pot holed and never-gritted, with few warning signs, coupled with these back routes are used as a speedy cut-through by motorists at peak times (when we need to commute to work on bike) because of traffic jams in cities like Inverness, Aberdeen - all of which have been earmarked for "much needed" dual carriageway bypasses required XXX million pounds in funding, while cycle lanes get a couple of thousand each year.

I know this is not restricted to Scotland - but what these figures and probably equivalent figures in England show, is we are getting out and about on bikes more, yet the money to make us safer is just not being spent (outside of a few places like London)

Paul M | 10 years ago

Any information on pedestrian casualties? Presumably there hasn't been a 19% increaes in pedestrians so if KSIs are up there, that is pretty damning.

Bigfoz | 10 years ago

Doesn't this mean cycling is actually safer? A 30% increase i cycling, a 19% increase in accidents...

Colin Peyresourde | 10 years ago

Purely from an anecdotal point of view, when cycling through Glen Coe the drivers of the tourist buses seemed to have a complete disregard for my safety, driving inches from me on a windy day.

I even pass close to me while they were overtaking on-coming traffic. It was a ridiculous manoeuvre. Though Glencoe is the only place I had such dangerous experiences, however, our route was one which took us mostly through quiet Scottish roads so not the fairest reflection.

Around the popular tourist locations the roads are narrow and not conducive to both cyclists and shuttling lots of tourists to and from hotels.

Latest Comments