A council has pulled the plug on a cycling scheme which residents hoped would have created a safe route for local school children.
Campaigners say they hope that planners will reconsider 'preferably before a serious accident'.
Residents in Chesterfield were hoping to see the 'Hipper Valley Greenway project' included in a major £1.6m east to west cycling route being created by Derbyshire County Council.
The Derbyshire Times report however that the planned cycle path has instead been routed along a different street, Chatsworth Road and plans for a safe cross-country route from Somersall to Holymoorside have been scrapped.
The council says it has funding for the plan in place but has not been able to secure the agreement of all concerned parties.
Locals say it is a ‘missed opportunity’ to create a safe cycling route for children attending several schools in the area.
Dr Brendan Ryan, who previously called for schools in the town to be linked by safe commuting routes, said the path would be less than 1km long and offered the ‘exciting possibility’ of active travel to more than 300 school children to and from Walton Holymoorside Primary School (WHPS), Brookfield School and St Mary’s School.
He said: "It would allow disabled access from Holymoorside to supermarkets, into town and the train station.
"It would solve the school run problem at WHPS and reduce it at Brookfield. If this route only brought the percentage of pupils using active travel to get to school up to the national average, it would be over 100 fewer cars on each school run to WHPS alone.”
Dr Ryan said he hoped the council ‘will reconsider its position, preferably before there is a serious accident outside WHPS’.
A letter from the land owners to the county council, says: “The decision taken negates nearly 20 years of time consuming, expensive negotiations and meetings with us.
"We have never at any stage opposed the Greenway or Cycle Way.
“The council has never attempted to meet the very real concerns of the various landowners regarding public liability, maintenance and problems of access, or the public’s concern about protective fencing where cattle are kept at the Holymoorside end and the type of surface to be used.”
Alastair Meikle, secretary of the Chesterfield Cycle Campaign, said the proposed route, including Chatsworth Road, remained a ‘step change for cycle infrastructure in Chesterfield’.
A spokesperson for Derbyshire County Council said: “We’ve had a plan to extend the Greenway from Somersall Park on the west side of Chesterfield to Holymoorside for many years and have been negotiating with appropriate landowners for a considerable length of time.
"Although we have been able to secure the necessary funding for this project and have made significant progress we have unfortunately been unable to reach an agreement with all concerned and have therefore decided to not proceed with this section of the route.
“We know that many local people will be disappointed, as are we, but we must concentrate our money and time on projects that we can complete in a reasonable timeframe.”
Add new comment
11 comments
Shameful!
Sounds like somebody with influence has opposed it. If you want to push ahead with an infrastructure project that not everyone agrees with you use a compulsory purchase order, well you would if it were motons. "But I once saws a child riding a bike on a footpath, so they don't deserve it."
Okay, so a letter from the land owners declares that they have never opposed it, so why are the council pulling the plug? What have they been doing for 20 years when it's only 1km long?
Can we start putting some of these people against the wall in preparation for the revolution?
I was going to do that, but couldn't get the landowners to agree on the 1km long wall we'd have to build....
As I understand it, the landowners were in full support but they wanted the council to indemnify them from any potential public accident claim (this doesn't happen with the existing footpath), help with fencing in livestock and other issues.
20 years?!!
This isn't HS2, folks, what the hell are you playing at?
That's exactly why it's taken 20 years - it's a cycling route, not a road or a railway. Road or railway project - pushed through, as people want more roads.
But 97% pf people don't care about cycling routes, as they don't cycle (and probably never will without a massive change in both infrastructure AND attitudes). So there's a huge built-in opposition to any cycling infrastructure project; feet get dragged, funding held back (or appropriated for other, non-cycling projects), and the situation never changes.
Ban cars from stopping/parking within 200m of every primary school and the drivers have to start looking for a solution to the school run problem, and walking/bikes start to look like they might be part of it.
But the whole thing is nonsense, anyway; giving people some sort of right to "choose" their childrens' school was always bound to create the school run phenomemon, and successive Governments haven't seemed remotely interested in doing anything to curb that (presumably because the sale of all those SUVs depends on it).
People want their cake and to eat it; live in a nice area, and choose were their kids go to school - if it's 5+ miles away, no problem - we'll drive them there.
There is a primary school at the top of my road - the amount of cars at 3.30pm is ridiculous.......lazy barstewards....
And one has to agree - most people aren't interested in cycling infrastructure....they have their car if they need to get anywhere.
The issue is always lack of communication. You wonder how one side can say one thing, while the other side has a completely different understanding of the situation.
“The council has never attempted to meet the very real concerns of the various landowners..." versus "we have unfortunately been unable to reach an agreement with all concerned ..."
So did they try to, or not?
If I was being cynical I could interpret it as
"In spite of several meeting no-one offered me enough money"
but then that would just be me thinking not reality
Typical visionary 21st Century thinking from our elected "representatives" as usual then.