- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
news
Preston Road North (Google Maps)"It would be sacrilege to take up the grass verges," claims local, as cycle lane plan with "enormous benefits for the community" met with vocal opposition
A council in North East England has proposed a major project to build protected cycle lanes along a busy A-road to bring "enormous benefits for the community". However, some unimpressed locals have spoken out about the infrastructure — specifically being built with the aim of "reducing congestion and improving air quality" by encouraging residents to replace car journeys with active travel ones — which they claim will cause "chaos", "gridlock", and would be "sacrilege" if it involves taking up grass verges to make space.
North Tyneside Council has proposed the active travel scheme for the A192 Preston Road North in North Shields, hoping to provide a one-way cycle lane on either side of the busy route that connects North Shields town centre to the even busier A1058 to the north, the main route to Newcastle upon Tyne.
With several schools in the area, most notably John Spence Community High School at the roundabout where Preston Road North joins the A1058, the council is keen to "provide a safe link for cyclists, including schoolchildren, between the town centre and the A1058 Coast Road", proposals also including a crossing upgrade outside the school, a new toucan crossing, and changes to junctions.
In short, as one local Lorraine Scott told the ChronicleLive website: "It would work for me, I cycle with the kids for school but they are too young for the road. I don't feel safe on the road, it would totally suit me. I wouldn't go on the road here if the path was put in, the road gets quite busy, it would be perfect."
Work is expected to begin in the spring, Paul Watson the head of highways at the council explaining the long-term aim is to "encourage more people to switch from cars to sustainable modes of travel and deliver many benefits for both residents and the environment".
And while he accepts in the short-term there will be "some disruption" as the route is constructed and changes made, the long-term benefits of "promoting active travel, reducing congestion, and improving air quality" will, he says, provide "enormous benefits".
"Most of the new cycle lanes will use the existing road space and be built out from the kerbside, with efforts to retain as much grass as possible. While one stretch of grass will need to be removed, we are preserving a wider grass verge along the same section of road to minimise the impact. Junction designs have been carefully considered to ensure safety for both cyclists and motorists, maintaining smooth navigation," he said.
However, the mood of some residents expressing their views in the local press has not been so positive, 60-year-old Gillian Ferguson who lives on a street just off Preston Road North claiming "it would be sacrilege to take up the grass verges, they are the only green spaces we have got here and trying to get parked here is crazy, it's madness."
"We don't need one, for how many cyclists I have seen," she added, before husband Neville said it is "disproportionate for the number of people that will use it and this part is bad enough without a cycle track, by 3.30 because of the school, you can't get up or down the road".
The claims did not seem to consider the council's confidence the scheme, by providing a safe and accessible route for active travel, would encourage people out of cars and onto bikes, freeing up road space and reducing congestion.
Likewise, another local, Derek Miller, claimed it would cause "absolute chaos".
"It is bad enough getting down here as it is and the traffic that backs up towards the school. It is going to create a gridlock in Preston Village because people are going to start going around a different way," he said.
The council disputes the idea the cycle lane will increase congestion and says the focus is on creating and "improving sustainable travel links between the A1058 Coast/Beach Road and North Shields town centre [...] It forms part of the strategic network of cycle routes throughout North Tyneside."
"It also complements and ties into wider regeneration plans for North Shields and supports the local authority's ambition to work towards the borough being carbon net-zero by 2030," information on the local authority's website states.
Dan is the road.cc news editor and has spent the past four years writing stories and features, as well as (hopefully) keeping you entertained on the live blog. Having previously written about nearly every other sport under the sun for the Express, and the weird and wonderful world of non-league football for the Non-League Paper, Dan joined road.cc in 2020. Come the weekend you'll find him labouring up a hill, probably with a mouth full of jelly babies, or making a bonk-induced trip to a south of England petrol station... in search of more jelly babies.
Latest Comments
- the infamous grouse 23 sec ago
100% of scotplod aren't interested in the effects of that statistic.
- chrisonabike 4 min 1 sec ago
Could be a winning strategy if they can preferentially kill off those unlikely to vote for them - or to fund their party?...
- mark1a 36 min 24 sec ago
Just checked the codes on the back of my licence (only passed a standard car test in 1988) and can drive a car up to 3500kg with any weight of...
- Cyclo1964 37 min 15 sec ago
Bar - humbug 😉
- Wingguy 52 min 38 sec ago
It certainly arrived several years too late... but it would have failed anyway, the lever feel and performance of the whole system was just awful....
- David9694 59 min 38 sec ago
I thought it amusing that there was a car parked in the opening when Google passed. Anyway, I refer you to the official list of Driver Free Passes ...
- wycombewheeler 1 hour 8 min ago
I made the mistake of attending the police station to report a crime, and they just told me to do it over the phone.
- Hirsute 1 hour 10 min ago
I need more training to prevent 48mph passes into oncoming traffic.
- Zermattjohn 1 hour 13 min ago
Saturation flow, that's what you need to refer to. Get the mayor to call TfL traffic engineers and ask what it means. He'll have his tiny mind...
- hawkinspeter 1 hour 20 min ago
I'd like to follow your example, but I never got on the Twitter train in the first place. When it transitioned to X, I almost considered signing up...
Add new comment
32 comments
Yep, let's not dig up the verge, people need them to park their cars.
Cycle lanes may be useful for parking as nobody else use s them
.
"Nobody"? Are you quite sure about that, wheely?
No true cyclist - because they're all busy blocking traffic before swerving onto the pavement and riding over the speed limit the wrong way past a red light so they can run over wheelchair users.
Back in reality - road.cc has explained this phenomenon.
TBH the more I see on-road cycle lanes as opposed to separated cycle paths the more I wonder what they're for?
The existing fast and brave riders will often ignore them because they're not continuous. Where they are they're full of parked cars, boarding buses, delivery vehicles unloading, rubbish and holes. They don't protect you - they may increase risk by hemming you in and making you less visible.
They're not tempting many new cyclists either. (Reportedly some, my anecdata - but not sure the numbers can be seen above random fluctuation. Of course there are lots of reasons why people aren't riding bikes in the UK.)
They don't even look good where cycling is socially acceptable, speed limits are lower and drivers are much better trained.
I guess they act as (very polite) notice that "you're not the only road users" to motorists. Plus visual narrowing of the carriageway?
"....Gillian Ferguson who lives on a street just off Preston Road North claiming "it would be sacrilege to take up the grass verges....."
I wasn't sure what sacrilege meant, so I looked it up:
"Sacrilege is the violation or injurious treatment of a sacred object, site or person."
I'm pretty sure that Gillian wouldn't think the grass was sacred if it was being removed to widen the road or provide more parking.
All the other anti comments were just as bad and completely untrue, and if Cycling Mikey's video can be fact checked, why can't those comments.
Maybe it's religious grass? She could be a rasta?
We had one of these recently where the local Council wanted "a modest scheme" to appeal to nimby voters and create a wedge issue with County who are the LHA.
TBH it sounds like the usual "retain my personal benefits" neanderthal tendency.
Fight.
60-year-old Gillian Ferguson who lives on a street just off Preston Road North claiming "it would be sacrilege to take up the grass verges, they are the only green spaces we have got here and trying to get parked here is crazy, it's madness."
I'm willing to bet a million pounds (and a leg) that she's removed the grass from her front garden to make a parking space.
Sounds more like she regulalrly parks on the grass verges, otherwise why link parking shortages with the loss of grass verges at all.
But that she never actually uses to park her car on because it's easier to park on the verge…
I'm local to this.
Location is here https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@55.0215467,-1.4528897,18.5z?entry=ttu
Drawings are here
https://my.northtyneside.gov.uk/category/1739/a192-preston-road-healthy-...
The 6 houses affected by parking retain their parking, and only one section of verge is lost. Blah blah blah....
Its all single carriageway at the moment and remains as such, all the traffic problems are juts caused by the sheer volume of cars. Preston Village is used as a rat run at peak times anyway - if thats such a problem then just put a modal filter beyond the Monks Wood Access.
If they think they should not have cycle lanes because they don't see many cyclists then they should get rid of the pavements to make space the bicycle lanes. In my town you see pavements on both side of every road, but you never see a pedestrian using them, a complete waste of valuable space.
"Sure, shitting in public has turned the streets into open sewers. But those people who spit on the sidewalk are really disgusting. Not least because I might slip on saliva the next time I'm looking for a place to take a dump."
If the grass is so precious, they should narrow the road or ban polluting cars completely.
It would be madness to give people a safe option to cycle instead of using their cars, as there are too many cars and it would cause gridlock...
Grass is not sacred ground.
Houses get built on it, roads get widened, but only when cycle tracks are proposed do a few people treat the green stuff as sacrosanct.
I bet if the council were proposing to dig it up and tarmac over it to make more parking spaces the same people would be all for it
Still a cycle lane apparently (though people often confuse the language)? If so not so good, for a busy A road and wanting kids to use it a separated cycle path is needed. At least they're taking space from that wide wide road though.
Sometimes these quotes are so lacking in awareness I wonder if road.cc is making them up!
You beat me to it- I wonder how often those sacred green verges are churned into mud by, or covered with, parked cars...
Also valuable - nay, sacred - green space (true) because ... all the rest of the space is under tarmac for motor vehicles (or those parked vehicles).
Sadly because of how inefficient this mode is it really is a bit of a zero-sum game. Above a certain number of people/motor vehicles we don't get to have nice things (parks, paths, pedestrian-only spaces) AND fast, easy access to them from any direction AND lots of parking.
Still - back in the Bad Old Days (pre-millenium?) when we (or our ancestors) were all poorer we appreciated things more (access to a park / the shops, conveniences of travel, next-week delivery)...
Not too mention the 'no one cycles here so we don't need a cycle lane'
Hint - the miles of tarmac for cars to speed on and lack of a cycle lane is exactly why no-one cycles...
We don't need a station here, no one ever arrives by train
Ever heard of the metro?
You've missed my point. I was pointing out the absurdity of the arguement "we don't need bike lanes because no one ever cycles here" by applying the same logic to a different form of transport. It wasn't a comment specific to the area in question but, yes, I have heard of the Metro, and have used it quite a few times.
I do
Haven't these people got lawns? I am from that neck of the woods and these houses are what you would call not average, they are really nice houses and therefore probably have front and back gardens. Only green space they have? Don't believe it for a second.
It's true, absolutely no other green space if you can't be arsed to walk for two minutes.
More likely means "I need somewhere close by for the dog to lay some eggs"
Exactly. There seems to a huge wodge of green space very close by.
But maybe it doesn't have a car park…
Pages