- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
news
range rover footage screenshot - via Mat Burnham on twitterCyclist driven into by Range Rover driver blasts "victim-blaming twaddle" from police who initially refused to take action
A cyclist who captured the moment a Range Rover driver hit him with their car has blasted Northants Police for "victim-blaming twaddle", sharing a letter from the police confirming they were not taking action because the victim placed himself "in front of the car" by dismounting his bike. The force's Chief Constable has now replied to the cyclist on social media to say the incident will be "reviewed and reassessed."
Good afternoon Mat. Please leave this with me, I will have it reviewed and reassessed. Nick https://t.co/BA2roNVWuN
— Nick Adderley (@NorthantsChief) August 7, 2022
The clip from Mat Burnham, shared on Twitter, starts with the driver of the Range Rover sounding the horn.
He told road.cc: "I was cycling in reasonably busy traffic through what is a pretty crappy set of junctions for cyclists to navigate safely.
"The Range Rover driver overtook in a rather rapid fashion to reach a set of traffic lights at red. I filtered through to the front of the lights and took primary. I think she took umbrage at that and sounded her horn."
Mat then dismounts his bike and appears to be shouting at the driver, before the car is driven into his bike.
Sharing a letter from Northants Police after reporting the incident, Mat said it was "confirmed as an assault" but no action was taken "due to victim-blaming twaddle."
Surprisingly the officer tells Mat that the driver has steered "to her right to try to avoid you", saying that he has "put himself in harm's way in front of the car".
He continued: "To be honest I didn't expect much to come of reporting the collision as my previous experience of Northamptonshire Police has had them generating excuses on behalf of drivers rather than addressing poor behaviour.
"I thought they'd at least take it seriously, and warn the driver verbally or by letter even if they couldn't be bothered to prosecute. As it stands, she must still think deliberately driving into a cyclist is perfectly reasonable and rational behaviour."
He added: "I'm at my wits end. When will this nonsense end? Streets aren't safe for vulnerable road users and never will be without enforcement and basic decency."
The reason for police deciding not to forward the incident for prosecution has been questioned by numerous people on social media, with many suggesting that the cyclist's actions in the clip could provide no possible justification for what occurred.
road.cc has contacted Northants Police for comment.
Jack has been writing about cycling and multisport for over a decade, arriving at road.cc via 220 Triathlon Magazine in 2017. He worked across all areas of the website including tech, news and video, and also contributed to eBikeTips before being named Editor of road.cc in 2021 (much to his surprise). Jack has been hooked on cycling since his student days, and currently has a Trek 1.2 for winter riding, a beloved Bickerton folding bike for getting around town and an extra beloved custom Ridley Helium SLX for fantasising about going fast in his stable. Jack has never won a bike race, but does have a master's degree in print journalism and two Guinness World Records for pogo sticking (it's a long story).
Latest Comments
- Mr Blackbird 4 sec ago
Why the lazy assumption that cyclists don't contribute financially? In addition to paying income tax and council tax, nearly all of the cyclists I...
- slc 4 min 8 sec ago
I have sympathy for the sign installation guy. The vegetation is overhang from a private garden, so the sign guy may well be instructed to report...
- OldRidgeback 9 min 15 sec ago
Hmm, not a word about BMX bikes. My sons graduated in turn from the little Raleigh and went onto a BMX with an 18" wheel bought from (the horror)...
- Rendel Harris 12 min 59 sec ago
Very public spirited of him, the tax he would have to pay on capital gains (I'm not a tax expert by any means but I believe the exemption for cars...
- JMcL_Ireland 15 min 17 sec ago
Vision is not something the DUP has ever been noted for
- Les Ed 21 min 18 sec ago
I've just read that is someone with 217 points.
- Natrix 29 min 16 sec ago
As reported by Albert Londres in the Parisian newspaper in 1924............
- Shades 1 hour 16 min ago
Feels a bit unfair to refer to the entire B2B cycle path when this only affects the 1/3 of the route closest to Bristol (bandit country); only...
- mdavidford 2 hours 12 min ago
Seems to somewhat miss that there's not a simple rain/not rain binary, though, both in terms that all rain is not equal, and that it can be both...
Add new comment
35 comments
It would be interesting if Road.cc reached out to Matt for a comment on these shenanigans.
They have now: https://road.cc/content/news/police-chief-says-range-rover-clip-doesnt-tell-full-story-295101
I don't get this whole intimidation thing. Obviously I can see how being shouted at isn't nice and could well be scary, but if you are inside a 2.5 tonne vehicle with lockable doors and there are other people around what is the person on a bicycle going to do to you exactly?
Police chief now acting quite oddly, saying he's got CCTV and before and after footage that justifies the decision not to charge, but he won't show it without the permission of the complainant. Why not? He doesn't need the complainant's permission to share footage taken in a public place. He appears to be implying that he has evidence of provocation and almost daring the cyclist to publish the footage if he thinks he's hard enough. So the question is, if he has footage of an illegal act that justifies the driver hitting the cyclist, why isn't he charging the cyclist, and if he hasn't, why isn't he charging the driver?
https://twitter.com/Stokesy1966/status/1557059833286823936
That is odd - he's implying that there was a lot more happening involving the cyclist.
So, the next step is for the cyclist to either push further via a complaint or admit that they've been very selective with their editing.
Maybe the footage is from the previous night and she was hit by the Tyre Extinguishers? "My client feels extremely threatened by cyclists - last night she believes several criminally damaged her vehicle in a way which could have killed her and as a result that very morning she was unable to take her sick child / hamster to get treatment / get the videos back on time [is that still a thing?]. As you can imagine when she was confronted by the plaintiff she experienced uncontrollable panic..."
Being more realistic maybe the CCTV just show the cyclist taking the lane earlier ("blocking") or reacting to the motorist ("previous threats")?
It's "show your hand" from either side - let's see.
Even if they were, since that lady was done for dangerous driving for driving at protestors in the road whose sole aim was to disrupt what could the cyclist have to to justify the response of the driver ?
You have described mitigation but as HP points out, that's for the courts to rule on not the police who already stated it was assault.
It appears the light went green with Mat still off his bike abusing the woman; he seemed to be an active participant in road rage. If that woman lawyers up and said the cyclist made her feel unsafe, Mat might be in more trouble than her for bumping his bike to escape him.
Asking why she was hooting at him is not actually abuse. Maybe you've got better speakers than me, I can't hear any bad language or threats. Typical anti-cyclist drivel expected from you, yeah well she did drive into him with a 1.5 tonne vehicle but actually, yeah, he spoke to her, so...
2.5T
Interesting that they needed extra evidence to support the orginal decision rather than review the decision based on the evidence initially submitted.
Feel free to invent a narrative and make up some laws too.
It just goes to show. Next time. Put your right boot into that door. Get a good buckle into that panel.
Then. Take a left and hit the path. Taraaaa!
News just in. Adderly has just replied on Twitter saying the decision stands. Unless there was some prior interaction between Matt and the driver we havent seen that beggars belief.
I'd be temped to claim for a respray or similar on their insurance.
I hope Matt presses for a full explanation of this decision and shares it online, as prima facie it seems absurd.
It was assault but we are not going to do anything.
How far can I go then with my 1.8T vehicle if someone or something is in my way?
Got to be a UK first that the police requested and reviewed local cctv footage within two days, to aid their investigation.
Unless the cyclist had himself initiated an assault prior to the video, there is no justification for the claim that the car driver did not assault the cyclist or that there was no intent to do so. If this sort of thing continues, then it would seem that there is a need for an insurance scheme that would take such incidents to court.
What do you expect. I would like to know what the police actually do for anyone today? It doesn't matter what it is you report they simply don't want to know, unless it is a murder, or a death, or doing an intimate search on a teenage school girl...
I would like to know what the police actually do for anyone today?
Quite a lot if you're a close passing, RLJ-ing or MOT/ insurance/ VED evading motorist- by simply ignoring the immaculately proved offences. AK60 VCJ first reported 11th July
They certainly don't do anything in S E London / Kent area bar driving around at high speed in unmarked cars with their lights on.
The bike jackings around the Orpington area are spreading and they've done nothing at all to prevent them.
I'm sure they're always up for a strip search of a minor without the presence if an appropriate adult though.
My money is the review coming up with a charge of obstruction for the cyclist and no action against the motorist.
Don't see what the problem was - it was clearly a friendly toot* to make sure the cyclist was aware there was a car behind, followed by a friendly nudge**, just in case the cyclist was blind and deaf and was unaware of the car.
*©AN 2022
**Not ©AN 2022
Your access to justice is directly proportional to your bank balance.
Saw this one on Twitter before it appeared here, utterly befuddling. I'm sure everyone will have differing opinions about the cyclist's conduct and the motorist's conduct, but how can a police officer write to someone and use the words "there is an assault" and then say they're not taking it any further? Hope the Chief Constable will not only rectify matters but also educate his officers that you're not actually supposed not to take action on something that you admit is an assault.
Or to put it another way, assault = crime = prosecute.
Institutionally anti-cyclist
Swift pick up on this story.
As per the Twitter thread when ExReb were protesting, the driver got done for dangerous driving. This is just the same, so how can the response be any different.
Unless of course the driver was simply letting the cyclist know they were there...
Then the sun was in her eyes and the cyclist was 'being arrogant' or looking at her in a funny way and riding on the cracks in the tarmac.
I'm pretty sure this is covered in the HC theory test.
Q. Another road user does something which annoys you. Which is the correct response?
A. Sound your horn to teach them a lesson in road manners.
B. Use your vehicle to push the miscreant aside.
C. Both of the above.
You missed out D. Kill or maim them if you can.
Pages