Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Cyclists to be banned from Oxford Street as part of Sadiq Khan’s pedestrianisation plans, but could be allowed to cycle at night

Mayor of London’s office has confirmed that it’s working to provide “alternative routes and enhanced provision” for cyclists, in a bid to transform the high street into a “beautiful public space”

Cyclists will not be allowed to access London’s Oxford Street as part of Sadiq Khan’s pedestrianisation plans, with the Mayor’s office confirming to road.cc that it’s working to provide “alternative routes and enhanced provision” for cyclists, with a potential for opening it to be used by cyclists at night.

In an announcement that even “blindsided” Westminster City Council — responsible for the central London high street — Mayor Sadiq Khan’s office said this morning that a 0.7 mile stretch between Oxford Circus and Marble Arch will become a traffic-free road, with the potential for further changes towards Tottenham Court Road.

The pedestrianisation initiative, aimed at creating a “beautiful public space”, comes as part of the mayor’s “urgent actions” to transform and revitalise the street that was affected by a shift to online shopping and the Covid-19 pandemic, so that it can “once again become the leading retail destination in the world.”

road.cc reached out to the Mayor of London’s office to ask whether cyclists will be allowed to be a part of this ‘beautiful public space’ and were told: “We will be working with the community and stakeholders to finalise specific plans, but the concept for Oxford Street is as a pedestrianised area.

“We will be working to provide alternative routes for cyclists, enhanced cycling provision and potential cyclist access at night.”

It’s not clear how cyclists will be barred entry from the high street, and if cyclists found riding on the road will penalised or not, but more details about the plan are expected to emerge later.

> Proposed Oxford Street cycling ban a “disaster for cycling in London,” says Andrew Gilligan

The pedestrianisation plans formed part of Khan’s election manifesto in the 2016 London mayoral elections. He previously tried to implement major changes to Oxford Street, but was blocked from implementing his plans primarily by Westminster City Council, led by Tories at the time.

This time, his plan has been backed by the new UK Government, aimed at delivering a “much-improved experience for shoppers, residents, workers and tourists visiting Oxford Street and the surrounding area” and compete with other international high street destinations, such as Times Square in New York, the Champs-Elysees in Paris and Las Ramblas in Barcelona.

The Mayor said: “Oxford Street was once the jewel in the crown of Britain’s retail sector, but there’s no doubt that it has suffered hugely over the last decade. Urgent action is needed to give the nation’s most famous high street a new lease of life.

“I am excited to be working with the new Government, and local retailers and businesses, on these plans - that will help to restore this famous part of the capital to its former glory, while creating new jobs and economic prosperity for the capital and the country.

“I want Oxford Street to once again become the leading retail destination in the world. The transformation of Oxford Street will be a leading example of how working together – City Hall and the new Government – we can build a better London for everyone.”

Oxford Street pedestrianisation (via TfL).jpg

 

Angela Rayner, Deputy Prime Minister said that the plan to revitalise Oxford Street will “drive growth by creating new jobs, generating economic activity, and giving a much-needed boost to London’s night-time economy.”

However, Westminster City Council, now led by Labour, said that they weren’t made aware of this announcement and only found out about the details less than a week ago. However, it said that it would “work constructively” with the mayor.

Stuart Love, Chief Executive of Westminster City Council said: “Westminster City Council has spent the last two years working closely with businesses and resident groups to develop detailed proposals to redesign and improve Oxford Street.

“These plans are shovel ready, have had the support of retailers and the local community and were intended to deliver significant economic growth whilst also securing a successful future for our thriving neighbourhoods in the West End.

“It will be important to receive further details about what is planned, including how long it could take to be delivered and how the concerns of local residents and users of the street will be addressed.

“We will want to know how they will benefit from any proposals, particularly given the practical challenges pedestrianisation may have for the wider area. As a custodian of the West End, our role will be to ensure that local voices are heard loud and clear.”

> Banning cyclists and pedestrians from Britain's "most expensive street" slammed "a selfish and spiteful act" by Labour candidate standing for election in the area

In 2017, London’s cycling and walking commissioner Will Norman had conceded that cyclists could be banned from Oxford Street once it gets pedestrianised, saying: “In Oxford Street in the morning peak there are about 200 cyclists per hour. In Wigmore Street, slightly to the north, there are about the same number per hour, and again on New Cavendish Street and George Street.

“As a combination, they begin to add up, so it’s very important we do look at the cycling facilities in that area as part of that scheme. Whether they go down Oxford Street or alternative routes, that is why we do need to do a consultation and understand what the needs are of local residents and other stakeholders.”

In the same year, Andrew Gilligan, London’s former cycling commissioner under Boris Johnson, claimed that banning cyclists from Oxford Street represented “an unqualified disaster for cycling in London.”

He warned that the lack of suitable parallel routes for safe infrastructure for bike riders means an Oxford Street cycling ban would be ignored by many, and that the road will become “London’s biggest unofficial example of the notorious failure that is shared space.”

“That won’t be good for pedestrians, or for the image of cycling. There will be near-misses or worse, arrests, fines, stories in the Daily Mail,” he wrote in a Guardian blog. “For the avoidance of doubt, I do not approve of anyone disobeying the rules. But it’s what happens when you make proposals for a road that totally ignore one of its main user groups.”

Previously, Kensington Palace Gardens, a half-mile-long tree-lined avenue dubbed Britian’s most expensive street and ‘Billionaires Row’ thanks to its £35 million average house price, had come under fire for its decision to ban cyclists along with pedestrians back in June.

The move was slammed as “a selfish and spiteful act” by Joe Powell, the Labour parliamentary candidate in Kensington & Bayswayer, who even launched a petition calling for the “crucial, safe connection between Notting Hill Gate and Kensington High Street” used by thousands of pedestrians and cyclists every day to be reopened.

Adwitiya joined road.cc in 2023 as a news writer after graduating with a masters in journalism from Cardiff University. His dissertation focused on active travel, which soon threw him into the deep end of covering everything related to the two-wheeled tool, and now cycling is as big a part of his life as guitars and football. He has previously covered local and national politics for Voice Wales, and also likes to writes about science, tech and the environment, if he can find the time. Living right next to the Taff trail in the Welsh capital, you can find him trying to tackle the brutal climbs in the valleys.

Add new comment

46 comments

Avatar
Rendel Harris | 1 month ago
4 likes

From my observations of cycling round a good part of London most days, using Santander bikes or Lime/Human Forest ebikes has become one of the most popular ways for tourists to get around London, at least in decent weather. I wonder if this was considered before the decision to restrict bicycle access to this prime tourist destination was made? Very few resident Londoners go shopping in Oxford Street, it's highly reliant on tourists; if the aim is to rejuvenate the street then banning a mode of transport that's highly popular with its prime customer demographic would seem shortsighted to say the least.

Avatar
a1white | 1 month ago
0 likes

To be honest Oxford street is not a great place to cycle and I usually take alternatives. They could easily add contraflow cycle lanes on the one way streets to the north.

Avatar
mattw | 1 month ago
7 likes

I'm loving the helpless fury in the Daily Mail.

A 4 year old child ranting about a decision made by his parents that he Khan't have a jammy-dodger before being sent to bed.

More seriously, this will be a good conversation to be held publicly so early in a new, hopefully grown-up, Government.

 

Avatar
chrisonabike | 1 month ago
2 likes

When they say "pedestrianised" presumably they're not ignoring elephants and they are genuinely going to remove all the buses and taxis?  I would imagine the planners would be far more worried about opposition to doing that than a few shouty cyclists...

If not ... it's not pedestrianised.  It's just some arbitary "but cycling!" rule.

I think it can be appropriate to designate some places "pedestrians only" (with the usual caveats of the UK's mess around what counts as "mobility vehicles").  This would be most sensible where it would be "self-enforcing" e.g. sheer numbers of pedestrians signal (to all but the hugely antisocial - who are a separate issue really) that it's not worth the bother of cycling through.

However without providing a large volume of excellent cycle parking we get to "where do the many people who drive to the walk park?"  (We should follow NL where they do this for cycles near the main city centre "destinations" in a similar way as in the UK we do with multistorey car parking garages.)

The "where to put the motor traffic" also still applies to buses - even though they're more space-efficient than cars.  Of course in the UK we are very comfortable with islands of "people space" isolated by major traffic arteries...

Also many places keen on this idea already have massive spaces devoted to motor vehicles (often in two directions) running through them - so they should at least be open to considering the idea of retaining a much smaller, quieter, less dangerous cycle path.  Particularly if not doing that would make a big hole in a cycling network (another novel and radical - if not totally foreign - concept in the UK...).

Avatar
AidanR replied to chrisonabike | 1 month ago
1 like

Yes, Khan's plan is to remove buses and taxis, but the council is apparently pushing back on the bus ban on the grounds that people with mobility issues could otherwise be excluded.

Avatar
David9694 replied to AidanR | 1 month ago
1 like

Would any of those be cyclists who use a bike or trike as a mobility aid by any chance?

But seriously, there must be a dozen bus routes to re-route, e.g. along Seymour Street to the north (also looks good on the map as a replacement for cycling). 

They must have thought about the mix of building uses, so as examples the Debenhams and House of Fraser buildings are set to become hq/offices, hopefully with a lot less crappy souvenir and sweet shops and some hospitality, maybe tourism openings.

I like the idea of improving the setting of Marble Arch and if only we could do similar for the Wellington Arch down at Hyde Park Corner. These are the UK's Arc De Triomphe and Brandenburg Gates effectively sacrificed to cars. 

This is a headline-grabber, but Oxford Street is a bit out on a limb - I would say there is more to do like this around Leicester Square and Covent Garden to build on existing pedestrianisations.  We can have both, can't we? 

Avatar
mdavidford replied to David9694 | 1 month ago
0 likes

David9694 wrote:

These are the UK's Arc De Triomphe and Brandenburg Gates effectively sacrificed to cars.

I'm not sure the Arc de Triomphe is exactly known for being traffic-free.

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to David9694 | 1 month ago
0 likes

First line - ah, but I believe there's still a problem in that there isn't formal recognition of bikes and trikes as mobility vehicles (or "invalid carriages").

See this old campaign by Wheels for Wellbeing, (some of) the government guidance about classes of "powered mobility vehicles" etc.  IIRC there are varying definitions in different circumstances.  So it may be possible to get some recognition e.g. for monies towards this / you may still be eligable for some benefits if you can and do use a bike, but it is still not legal to ride it in some places where e.g. some mobility vehicles are allowed.

Avatar
brooksby | 1 month ago
1 like

This would only be 'fair' if some sort of safe alternative routes for cyclists are put in place.*

 

 

*Except they won't be - after Oxford Street is closed to all traffic, the motor traffic which is diverted along parallel routes will take up so much of the road space that there Just Won't Be Room to put cycle routes in place…

Avatar
Groadie | 1 month ago
0 likes

It'll take a lot more than pedestrianisation to turn Oxford Street back into some kind of elite shopping street. That ship sailed a long time ago. It would have been an opportunity to create a traffic free cycling route across the centre and it's a pity that's been ruled out, particularly in view of the fact that more motorised traffic is going to be forced onto the already busy alternative parallel roads alongside the cyclists who will also have to use them. I can imagine Piccadilly becoming more choked up than it already is. Waste of public money to make things worse for all road users, imo.

Avatar
OldRidgeback replied to Groadie | 1 month ago
1 like

Piccadilly has been traffic choked since the 1970s at least. Just look at some old photos of the area. 

Avatar
Rome73 | 1 month ago
2 likes

I completely agree with this. Oxford Street should be completely pedestrianised and free of motor vehicles and cycles. It will hugely improve the area. There are alternatives, if one wants to cycle between TCR and Marble Arch. Some of them are a bit 'round the houses' so they must be improved and made more direct. Improvements have already been made in reducing traffic on Tottenham Court Rd and Charing X road so making Oxford Street pedestrian only will be a huge bonus for London. It should also mean that Regents Street and Great Portland Street will become traffic free or at least less. At the moment they are gnarled up with belching traffic queues.  

Avatar
OldRidgeback replied to Rome73 | 1 month ago
2 likes

There aren't direct parallel route alternatives to Oxford St. And a lot of those indirect routes are along narrow streets that already have a lot of footfall. I think a better idea would be to retain a dedicated cycle lane along Oxford St. Internet shopping has put an end to the big shops that made Oxford St so special back in the day (I visited Edinburgh last month and the same is true for Princess St). Maybe encouraging more bars and clubs into Oxford St would see it revitalised, but the rents would have to be capped.

Avatar
Rendel Harris | 1 month ago
0 likes

Quote:

...compete with other international high street destinations, such as Times Square in New York, the Champs-Elysees in Paris and Las Ramblas in Barcelona.

That's got to be the first time any of those streets (and Times Square, obviously, clue's in the name, isn't even a street), or indeed Oxford Street, have been described as a "high street".

Avatar
stonojnr replied to Rendel Harris | 1 month ago
4 likes

Yep Times Square is more Piccadilly Circus as a comparison. They mean 5th Avenue imo, though Regents St would argue they're already that equivalent as a shopping destination for London.

Though no one asked for Oxford Street to become the vape & American sweet shop capital. Funnily enough neither of which are in evidence much in Times Square.

The only thing Las Ramblas,Times Sq & Oxford Street, Champs is different ime, have in common are theyre a haven for pick pockets and unwary tourists.

I suspect most local cyclists avoid Oxford Street anyway there are plenty of parallel road options

Avatar
timmyotool | 1 month ago
6 likes

Yep, fine by me, it's a small sacrifice to prevent cars.

Like many a pedestrianised high st, bikes are not permitted to be ridden.

Peds are oblivious on Oxford St already, I wouldn't fancy riding a bike down a car-less version myself, it'd be even worse.

Avatar
Paul J | 1 month ago
9 likes

As a recent tourist to Oxford st, and as someone who spent a month or so working in London before and had that street on his cycle commute - good idea. As it is, it sucks for cycling along, cause of all the tourists - better to take some other parallel roads; and it sucks for the tourists with the vehicle traffic.

A major shopping street should be for pedestrians.

Avatar
alexuk | 1 month ago
1 like

Ho Ho Ho! Come on everyone. Let's hear your comments on this one? Khan is the WORST. Always has been. Always will be.

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to alexuk | 1 month ago
11 likes

alexuk wrote:

Ho Ho Ho! Come on everyone. Let's hear your comments on this one? Khan is the WORST. Always has been. Always will be.

I can't believe that you think that Khan is the worst of politicians - you must have ignored a LOT of other people to come to your conclusion. Is it a racist thing?

Anyhow, I generally don't agree with banning cyclists from roads, but Oxford Street is just insane with the number of pedestrians, so it might actually be more practical for cyclists to take a parallel route (though my recollection is that there aren't any straight parallel routes close by). Usually my preference would be for them to provide a marked cycle lane, but that's just going to lead to confrontation as not a single pedestrian would take notice of that.

Avatar
Dnnnnnn replied to hawkinspeter | 1 month ago
8 likes

hawkinspeter wrote:

I can't believe that you think that Khan is the worst of politicians

You haven't been keeping up with social media... lots of people there reporting that "Khan has DESTROYED London" (their caps). And someone else called "Khant" as well. The MSM isn't reporting the deaths and injuries because they are part of the liberal elite Islamic fundamentist conspiracy. Probably. 

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to Dnnnnnn | 1 month ago
6 likes

Dnnnnnn wrote:

You haven't been keeping up with social media... lots of people there reporting that "Khan has DESTROYED London" (their caps). And someone else called "Khant" as well. The MSM isn't reporting the deaths and injuries because they are part of the liberal elite Islamic fundamentist conspiracy. Probably. 

...and that would be the reason why I haven't been keeping up with social media. I try to avoid stupid people, but social media amplifies the stupidity.

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to hawkinspeter | 1 month ago
8 likes

hawkinspeter wrote:

I can't believe that you think that Khan is the worst of politicians - you must have ignored a LOT of other people to come to your conclusion. Is it a racist thing?

Yes. Yes it is. With a side-order of Islamophobia.

Avatar
open_roads replied to hawkinspeter | 1 month ago
1 like

I'd agree that Oxford street shouldn't be open to cyclists but the telling point is that he didn't even consult the local (Labour run) council - he just told them it was happening. And that's not good enough.

Avatar
Steve K replied to open_roads | 1 month ago
2 likes

open_roads wrote:

I'd agree that Oxford street shouldn't be open to cyclists but the telling point is that he didn't even consult the local (Labour run) council - he just told them it was happening. And that's not good enough.

But the plan isn't new, is it - just the confirmation it's going ahead - so they've been consulted in the past?

Avatar
matthewn5 replied to open_roads | 1 month ago
1 like

It was in his manifesto. Westminster have had years of notice.

Avatar
Clem Fandango replied to alexuk | 1 month ago
10 likes

I don't have a problem with this at all.

Avatar
Clem Fandango replied to alexuk | 1 month ago
10 likes

alexuk wrote:

Ho Ho Ho! Come on everyone. Let's hear your comments on this one? Khan is the WORST. Always has been. Always will be.

have you seen John Wayne (playing Genghis Khan) in The Conqueror?  Terrible.  Clearly the worst Khan.

Avatar
NotNigel replied to Clem Fandango | 1 month ago
5 likes

Nah, the worst Kahn is them obnoxious looking modified range rovers.

Avatar
perce replied to Clem Fandango | 1 month ago
3 likes

Oh I don't know. What about Ricardo Montalban?

Avatar
Clem Fandango replied to perce | 1 month ago
8 likes

hmmm

Pages

Latest Comments