Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Drink-drug driver who killed cyclist jailed for seven and a half years under tougher sentencing law

Paul Watson, who admitted causing death of Terrance Keye, faced life imprisonment following change in law last year

A drunk and drugged driver who admitted killing a cyclist has been sent to prison for seven and a half years, the length of the sentence reflecting tougher laws introduced last year for dangerous drivers involved in fatal crashes.

Paul Watson, aged 39 and from Normanton, pleaded guilty to causing the death by dangerous driving of 53-year-old cyclist Terrance Keye when he crashed into him as he drove his Ford Transit van on Wakefield Road, Normanton, on Friday 10 February this year.

Watson, from Normanton, who was also banned from driving for 10 years when he appeared at Leeds Crown Court today, had also admitted driving while over the limit for both drink and drugs, says West Yorkshire Police.

Mr Keye had been riding his bike home from work when Watson, who was travelling at a speed of 55mph and was found to be 1.5 times over the legal limit for alcohol and twice the specified limit for cocaine, crashed into him while driving his van on the wrong side of the road.

Detective Constable Simon Marshall of the Major Collision Enquiry Team, said “Terrance was cycling home that evening, he was wearing reflective clothing and had lights on his bike. He did everything right.

“Watson, on the other hand, did everything wrong. He chose to drive whilst over the alcohol limit, he chose to drive whilst over the drug drive limit and he chose to drive dangerously. Terrance wasn’t able to make any choices."

In a victim impact statement read out to the court, Mr Keye’s mother said: “On the night of 10  February, two police officers came to my door to tell me that my only son, Terry had been killed.

“That night my life stopped,” she continued.

“I will never hear his key in my door again and saying ‘Mother, it’s only me’. No one will ever know the devastation and grief I am feeling every minute, every hour of every day and night,” Mr Keye’s mother added.

For offences committed on or after 28 June 2022, the maximum penalty for people convicted of causing death by dangerous driving is life imprisonment, compared to a maximum jail sentence of 14 years previously.

Conviction also results in an automatic disqualification from driving of at least five years, with an extended retest required should the offender wish to regain their licence once the ban has expired.

While there are widespread inconsistencies in punishment when it comes to motorists convicted of causing death by dangerous driving, the sentence handed down to Watson, following as it did a guilty plea which usually has the effect of lessening the term of imprisonment imposed, may be a signal that with the change in law, the courts will get tougher on drivers who kill.

Certainly, for offences committed before the law was changed for offences committed since late June last year, we have seen motorists convicted of causing death by dangerous driving receive lower jail terms and even non-custodial sentences.

Sergeant Mick Kilburn of West Yorkshire Police said: “Watson is the first person in West Yorkshire to be dealt with under the new sentencing guidelines that came into effect in June 2022.

“He was previously of good character having never been arrested before. We welcome the lengthy sentence and hope that this sends a message out that dangerous, and drink or drug driving will be dealt with seriously.

“I would like to take this opportunity to thank the officers who worked tirelessly in the days following this collision, making sure that Watson was no longer a danger to the public. Their hard work and dedication has resulted in a selfish and dangerous driver being imprisoned for a significant period of time.

“I would also like to pay tribute to Terrance’s family, who have had to deal with this devastating incident. Our thoughts remain with them at this difficult time, and I hope that today will allow them some closure on a tragic, yet avoidable, incident,” he added.

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

11 comments

Avatar
mattw | 10 months ago
0 likes

I need reporting on changes to sentencing guidelines, and these changes to the law.

The Sentencing Council put out another announcement last week (JUne 15 2023) about changes to 12 motoring Motoring Offence sentencing guidelines, including Wanton and Furious Driving (which covers cyclists obviously).

https://www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/news/item/sentencing-guidelines-for...

There's also a new one about "Causing Injury by Wanton or Furious Driving", which hopefully will also be used for cyclohoons on pedestrian crossings where the peds have a green light.

I can't get what the actual changes are from that, and sentencing guidelines are huge lists of bullet points without change bars.

Avatar
wtjs | 10 months ago
6 likes

This is so much better than the usual non-penalty penalty that I am encouraged. No suspended sentence, no community service, no community resolution, no warning

Avatar
chrisonabike | 10 months ago
14 likes

Police: "He was previously of good character having never been arrested before."

I'm all for not prejudging people and the law not speculating. But "39-year-old man has killed someone through woeful driving, found with drugs and alcohol in his system" - yeah, sure this was the first time.

We'll really know there have been some attitude changes by the judiciary (following society) when people who haven't been at the sauce who drive over others in daylight get sent down on a regular basis.  (Yes - much better to work harder to make this much less likely in the first place).

Avatar
NOtotheEU replied to chrisonabike | 10 months ago
11 likes

I don't think previous bad behaviour makes the slightest difference anyway. Sir Harry Djanogly was just banned after getting 19 points for different speeding offences. Apparently no one noticed when he got to 12 or even 16 points!

He'd previously got away with injuring a policeman who tried to stop him (for speeding naturally) by taking them for a ride on his Jaguars bonnet in 2015 and was banned for getting 12 points (guess what for) in 2021. On top of that he's still got a couple of speeding cases waiting to be heard!

I'm sure he and his ex solicitor, ex Under-Secretary at the Ministry of Justice and current MP son will have a good laugh about it at the next lodge meeting.

Avatar
mattw replied to NOtotheEU | 10 months ago
1 like

NOtotheEU wrote:

I don't think previous bad behaviour makes the slightest difference anyway. Sir Harry Djanogly was just banned after getting 19 points for different speeding offences. Apparently no one noticed when he got to 12 or even 16 points!

He'd previously got away with injuring a policeman who tried to stop him (for speeding naturally) by taking them for a ride on his Jaguars bonnet in 2015 and was banned for getting 12 points (guess what for) in 2021. On top of that he's still got a couple of speeding cases waiting to be heard!

I'm sure he and his ex solicitor, ex Under-Secretary at the Ministry of Justice and current MP son will have a good laugh about it at the next lodge meeting.

Sir Jangly has been an amazing benefit to the UK (owned Carrington Viyella iirc - refugee from Nazi Germany who made his home here), and benefactor, especially in Nottingham. Not quite on a Jesse Boot scale (who gave Nottingham University their campus), but substantial. He paid for a Science Block for my school way back around 1980, for example.

However he needs a long enough ban to prevent him ever driving again, and a professional chauffeur - especially since he is now based in London. As he is worth £300m he can afford it.

Avatar
peted76 replied to chrisonabike | 10 months ago
3 likes

chrisonatrike wrote:

Police: "He was previously of good character having never been arrested before."

I really wish they'd stop using this as some sort of defence. It really does seem meaningless in the scheme of driving offences, where getting caught seems the least likley of scenarios.

Avatar
wycombewheeler replied to peted76 | 10 months ago
1 like

peted76 wrote:

chrisonatrike wrote:

Police: "He was previously of good character having never been arrested before."

I really wish they'd stop using this as some sort of defence. It really does seem meaningless in the scheme of driving offences, where getting caught seems the least likley of scenarios.

In fairness with crime clear up rates so low, it's no less viable for driving than for any other offences.

Avatar
Secret_squirrel | 10 months ago
7 likes

ITS A START.

Avatar
essexian replied to Secret_squirrel | 10 months ago
4 likes

Indeed but one wonders what you would have to do to get life? Okay I know some time will have been deducted for the guilty plea but the full term he would have got without it was still about 11 years. 

Better but still not really good enough IMHO. 

Avatar
VIPcyclist replied to essexian | 10 months ago
2 likes

Yes it's the guilty plea that's reduced the sentence. I really do think that if you're over the proscribed limit for alcohol and drugs that your motor should be forfeit. Living in the Bradford area it's nearly impossible to have zero drugs ; the smell of it being all-pervasive.

Avatar
ymm replied to Secret_squirrel | 10 months ago
0 likes

Indeed. The wheel of the judiciary needs to turn more quickly to apply penalties from laws that match the need to protect the public who are being encouraged to move around more actively for lots of reasons. This is progress towards a point in (here's hoping!) the future where motorists will be far less likely to seemingly away with road crime.

Latest Comments