Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Elderly driver who crashed into cyclist for “unknown reasons”, leaving rider with broken back, handed suspended sentence

The driver, who was “maybe distracted” by tractors coming from the other direction, was “just not concentrating on the road ahead”, the court heard

A 70-year-old motorist who left a cyclist with a fractured spine after crashing into him from behind on a rural road has avoided prison after being handed a suspended sentence and a driving ban.

Michael Fowers, of Ferrers Avenue in Tutbury, crashed into the rider on Derby Road in Hilton shortly after midday on 6 April, 2024. The cyclist, who had been riding in a group following a café stop at the former Salt Box Café in nearby Hatton, was thrown from his bike in the impact and required hospital treatment for serious injuries.

Derby Crown Court heard that the victim, described as a keen cyclist, spent two days in hospital and had to wear a back brace for several months following the incident, which saw his high-value bicycle written off.

Judge Jonathan Bennett, sentencing, told Fowers: “On this particular day the complainant who I understand was a keen cyclist, on a Saturday lunchtime, was out with others enjoying a ride in the Hilton area when you hit him from behind. There is no suggestion you were speeding but for some reason, completely unknown to us, you did not see him.

“Admittedly there was a whole lane of tractors coming towards you in the other direction and why you did not see him I don’t know. Maybe you were distracted by the tractors – I don’t know.

“The consequences for him were that he was hospitalised with a fractured vertebra and was in a back brace for a long time. His bicycle, which I understand was an expensive one, was also written off.

“You just did not see him. You were just not concentrating on the road ahead.”

> “You’re literally playing with somebody’s life”: Daughter of cyclist killed by “reckless and foolish” elderly motorist with poor eyesight renews calls for mandatory driver eye tests

Prosecuting, Sarah Allen told the court that the rider had been part of a group split into two clusters when the collision occurred. She said Fowers, managed to safely overtake the first group of cyclists despite oncoming tractors. However, he then failed to notice the second group and struck the victim directly from behind.

“The defendant, who was driving a Jaguar S-Type, negotiated overtaking the first group successfully and a lane of tractors were coming towards them in the opposite direction,” said Allen. “For whatever reason, he just failed to see [the victim] and drove straight into the back of him. [The victim] has no recollection of the collision and was taken to hospital where it was discovered he had a fractured vertebra.”

DerbyshireLive reports the court heard that the cyclist, who was discharged from hospital two days later, had to rely heavily on support from his wife and sister in the weeks following the crash.

“He had to get up at 5.30am most mornings as he needed to be dressed by his wife, who works as a nurse and needed to leave early for her shifts,” said Allen. She added that the cyclist is the co-carer for his 93-year-old mother but his injuries meant he had to rely on his sister to carry out some of the tasks he would have done ordinarily.”

> Motorist avoids jail after crashing into cyclist while six times over drink drive limit and drinking vodka from 7Up bottle

Fowers, who pleaded guilty to causing serious injury by careless driving, had no previous convictions. His barrister, Emma Coverley, said he is retired and living on a modest pension.

“He lives with his wife and son and has a monthly income of around £1,000 and so could pay some compensation,” she said.

Judge Bennett sentenced Fowers to four months in prison, suspended for 12 months, and disqualified him from driving for 15 months. He was also ordered to pay £750 in compensation to the victim.

Currently, motorists aged 70 or over are required to reapply for their driving licence every three years, but there is no requirement for them to retake their driving test.

A 2022 poll found that almost three in four (74 per cent) Brits agreed that older drivers should be required to retake their driving test, with two-thirds saying that should happen before the driver’s 80th birthday.

By contrast, only 18 per cent of respondents believed that current regulations should remain in force.

> Do we need mandatory retesting for older drivers?

In a statement released after an 80-year-old driver was handed a suspended jail sentence and banned from driving for life after causing the death of a cyclist by careless driving in 2016, the charity Cycling UK called for a review of the licensing system for older drivers.

“Cycling UK recognises that sentencing elderly and otherwise law-abiding citizens for driving offences, when they have a long and largely unblemished driving record, is an unenviable task for judges more accustomed to punishing offenders they perceive the prisons were designed for,” the organisation said.

“This case however, not for the first time, raises the increasingly important issue of how, with an ageing population where people want to maintain independence and continue driving as long as possible, the DVLA regulates and tests the fitness to drive of those whose reactions, sight and road confidence are declining,” it added.

Adwitiya joined road.cc in 2023 as a news writer after completing his masters in journalism from Cardiff University. His dissertation focused on active travel, which soon threw him into the deep end of covering everything related to the two-wheeled tool, and now cycling is as big a part of his life as guitars and football. He has previously covered local and national politics for Voice Cymru, and also likes to write about science, tech and the environment, if he can find the time. Living right next to the Taff trail in the Welsh capital, you can find him trying to tackle the brutal climbs in the valleys.

Add new comment

11 comments

Avatar
Oldfatgit | 3 days ago
10 likes

It's still 'better' than the 6 points and small fine the guy that broke my back [and ulna, and knee, and 11 ribs] got.

Avatar
momove | 3 days ago
9 likes

So the fact the person injured had an expensive bike and was out for a leisure/sports ride is relevant, but that the person doing the injuring was driving an S-type Jag around on a Saturday afternoon isn't relevant?

But the modest pension is relevant, of course.

Avatar
paul_Onabike replied to momove | 3 days ago
14 likes

They also failed to mention that the car had no MOT, and was supposedly on its way to be scrapped - so should not have been on the road at all.

Avatar
anotherflat replied to paul_Onabike | 3 days ago
5 likes

So uninsured?
How is that not a massively aggravating factor?
£750 (plus whatever the MIB cough up)for presumably several thousand pounds bicycle, serious injuries, 2 months in a back brace and pain/reduced function for the rest of your life.
Ridiculous.

Avatar
mitsky | 3 days ago
14 likes

"four months in prison, suspended for 12 months, and disqualified him from driving for 15 months. He was also ordered to pay £750 in compensation to the victim."

While prison may not be suitable, why allow the driver to get his licence back after 15 months?
Surely if there is no known reason for him to not see the cyclist, it will only get worse as he gets older?

And the compensation is pitifull.
Hopefully the cyclist can get a massive payout to cover his suffering and future costs along with the bike, which will be paid by the driver's insurer.
Thus making future motor insurance for the driver unviable and keeping him off the road indefinitely.

Avatar
OnYerBike | 3 days ago
3 likes

I'm confused about the "compensation" and how the driver's income is relevant. Is that £750 purely punitive (and to be paid by the driver themselves), and therefore entirely in addition to whatever (much more substantial) civil damages the cyclist is entitled to claim (which would be covered by the driver's insurer)?

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to OnYerBike | 3 days ago
6 likes

Compensation orders are only made to an amount which means there is a realistic prospect that the defendant will be able to pay, which is why the driver's income is considered. Yes, as far as I'm aware it is punitive and it wouldn't have any impact on the amount due to the victim from the insurers.

Avatar
leedorney | 3 days ago
2 likes

How can you miss a cyclist

Avatar
mdavidford replied to leedorney | 3 days ago
16 likes

leedorney wrote:

How can you miss a cyclist

By not driving at them. Although many drivers do seem ignorant of this approach.

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to leedorney | 3 days ago
2 likes

Well, you can miss them once they've gone... (perhaps "now you see me" from the motorbike campaign?)

Avatar
Barraob1 replied to leedorney | 3 days ago
3 likes

He didn't

Latest Comments