Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

“Cycling is wonderful, but it is a very fragile sport”: Controversial organiser says the Tour des Pyrénées “is over”, after stage race marred by safety “chaos”

Pascal Baudron also apologised for calling the women’s peloton “spoiled children” for refusing to ride last weekend’s final stage

The organiser of the Tour Féminin des Pyrénées, the French stage race which attracted controversy last weekend after a range of safety issues prompted the peloton to refuse to start the third and final stage, has said that this year’s edition will be the last and claimed that it is “impossible” to completely close the roads in France.

Race director Pascal Baudron – who also came under fire for his comments in the wake of the event’s abrupt cancellation, in which he criticised the decision as the “whims of spoiled children” – apologised for his remarks, which he now says were “disproportionate” and made at a time when he was disappointed and frustrated.

Last Sunday, road.cc reported that the UCI decided to call off the final stage of the CIC-Tour Féminin International des Pyrénées – only the second edition of the three-day race – following two days of protests from a peloton concerned for its safety.

> Tour Féminin des Pyrénées stopped amidst rider safety issues

On the first stage into Lourdes, won in a sprint by Ashleigh Moolman-Pasio, members of the public were seen driving on the course, metres away from the riders at times, and parked cars and trucks littered the final kilometres while spectators wandered onto the roads.

A day later, the second stage to the Hautacam was then neutralised to the foot of the iconic summit finish after the peloton complained of race motorbike riders creating hazardous conditions.

“Considering the safety risks involved, we firmly believe that a bike race is not worth endangering the lives of the female cyclists,” Adam Hansen, the head of the riders’ union the CPA, said in a statement announcing that last Sunday’s third and final stage had been cancelled.

However, the UCI’s decision to put a stop to the final stage did not go down well with race organiser Pascal Baudron, who created further furore by claiming that the women’s peloton was “sawing off the branch on which they are sitting” by calling for improved safety measures at elite races.

“What is happening is that the girls have requirements that are not in line with their level,” he told La Nouvelle République following the race’s cancellation. “They imagine that they are on the Tour de France and that all the roads must be closed. But in France you cannot do that.

“Quite honestly, I tell myself that it is not worth organising a race to see all those months of effort ruined for the whims of spoiled children.”

> “They think they’re on the Tour de France”: Backlash against “sexist” race organiser who called pro riders “girls” and “spoiled children” over cancellation due to safety fears

Speaking almost a week later to Sporza, Baudron apologised for his use of language – deemed by many onlookers to be offensive and patronising towards the women’s pro peloton – but remained adamant that full road closures are not possible for smaller races like the Tour des Pyrénées, which he now says is unlikely to go ahead next year following the protests.

“My statements were disproportionate. I would like to apologise to all the riders I have hurt,” he told the Belgian broadcaster.

“I misexpressed myself at a time when I was disappointed, frustrated, and in a cold mood at the same time.”

“It was a mess and it keeps haunting my head all the time,” he admitted. “The finish in Lourdes was very poorly organised and that was our fault. It was pure chaos. If the stage race had been definitively stopped that day, I would not have had any problems with that.”

Tour Féminin des Pyrénées 2023 (GCN/Eurosport)

However, he says he is still upset that the UCI decided to cancel the stage on Sunday, “especially because the president of the race jury himself first said that the race conditions were perfect. The UCI commissaire was also of the opinion that safety was assured.”

He continued: “The riders want a course that is completely closed. But that is impossible in France. French law states that we can temporarily privatise the course, meaning we can block the route from the race director’s car to the broom wagon.

“The riders want the course to be 100 percent theirs. But only races such as the Tour and Paris-Roubaix are allowed to do so in France.”

Despite the organiser’s claims, 22-year-old British pro Connie Hayes, who was riding the Tour des Pyrénées for AWOL O’Shea, posted photos of Lourdes on Sunday, just two days after the traffic bedlam during stage one’s finale, which showed the town’s streets devoid of parked cars and completely closed – in order to accommodate an amateur cycle sportive.

Nevertheless, Baudron also claimed to Sporza that marshals are required at every junction, otherwise motorists encroaching on the course are “inevitable”.

“But we don’t have the financial and especially the human resources for that,” he says. “On a route of 125 kilometres you need 500 marshals at all junctions altogether. Just find those people.”

However, at a time when safety issues in cycling are tragically, devastatingly pertinent, Baudron says that the increasing demand for safer courses means that the Tour des Pyrénées, and other major races, will struggle to continue in the future.

“There will be no more Tour des Pyrénées,” he concedes. “If you organise something, you want to enjoy it. But now it was all misery. A major catastrophe. And moreover, we cannot make the race any safer than it is now.

“Our race will disappear. The Lotto Belgium Tour and the Women’s Tour have been cancelled before. It is also not certain that the Giro Donne will be able to continue at the end of this month. In the long run there will be no more races left.

“Cycling is wonderful, but it is a very fragile sport.”

Ryan joined road.cc in December 2021 and since then has kept the site’s readers and listeners informed and enthralled (well at least occasionally) on news, the live blog, and the road.cc Podcast. After boarding a wrong bus at the world championships and ruining a good pair of jeans at the cyclocross, he now serves as road.cc’s senior news writer. Before his foray into cycling journalism, he wallowed in the equally pitiless world of academia, where he wrote a book about Victorian politics and droned on about cycling and bikes to classes of bored students (while taking every chance he could get to talk about cycling in print or on the radio). He can be found riding his bike very slowly around the narrow, scenic country lanes of Co. Down.

Add new comment

7 comments

Avatar
yupiteru | 10 months ago
2 likes

In other words, it's only the women so anything will do.

Avatar
espressodan | 10 months ago
2 likes

Perhaps part of the problem is that Mr Baudron misunderstands exactly where 'organising' stops.

Avatar
marmotte27 replied to espressodan | 10 months ago
1 like

He doesn't eveknoe where it starts. Every road race I have seen on ehatever level had closed roads

Avatar
STATO replied to marmotte27 | 10 months ago
3 likes

marmotte27 - No regular UK road race other than criterium have fully closed roads.

Most races have moto riders ahead trying to block traffic, but these have no lawful power and so UK racers have to race 'in their lane' on one side of the road jsut as this Tour did.  Riders have been killed by cars that were parked or driving ignoring the motos directions. 

At Tour of Britain police bikes are used who have more power and so there is a section of closed road, this requires more organisation but can still mean parked cars are present at times. Police presence is only available for larger events tho where the impact/need is sufficient for them to attend, you cannot demand they police all races.

Tour of the Pyrenees should have had at least a rolling closure, but i guess it was not seen as a big enough event that had to happen?  A lot of the problem with racing at the moment seems to be a wish for better standards of safety, but that costs money or needs people to give up their time for free to then be critisized. 

Viewers are going to be the ones who will need to foot the bill in the ever increasing costs, but that wont happen, majority people commenting about the events at tour of the Pyrenees dont even seem to have watched it (i didnt), if people are not watching, who is going to pay for the improvements?

Avatar
MattieKempy replied to STATO | 10 months ago
4 likes
STATO wrote:

majority people commenting about the events at tour of the Pyrenees dont even seem to have watched it (i didnt), if people are not watching, who is going to pay for the improvements?

I did, or at least, I watched the second, mostly neutralised stage to Hautacam and traffic management was shocking, especially in the light of Stage 1 to Lourdes, which admittedly I didn't watch.

There were cars driving toward the peloton and quite literally pulling aside as the peloton was passing them as well as cars driving up sliproads in the same direction as the peloton with no-one to stop them either having entered the sliproad or entering the parcours if the peloton itself hadn't been passing.

I can understand the difficulty of marshaling every junction but to have neglected to marshal the sliproad of a major dual carriageway is poor, and for the supuervising motorcyclists to have allowed cars to continue to drive along the parcours is shocking. It's not exaggerating to say that a serious injury or death was possible.

It seems like within the limitations of a rolling road closure, a better traffic management plan, identifying likely points where problems could occur and places where traffic could be safely held, could have prevented most of the issues.

Avatar
Awavey replied to MattieKempy | 10 months ago
1 like

Basically stage 1 had no rider protection, which was clearly the fault of the organisers. Riders in the 2nd group behind the camera bike were riding on open roads and team cars were caught up in the traffic and mayhem. I also believe at least one rider was hit by a vehicle.

For stage 2 the organisers agreed to get more moto riders to marshall traffic, but I think they were inexperienced, having been sourced at less than 12hrs notice, and so weren't safeguarding the riders as they should have been, hence more problems, again there was a report of a collision with rider.

So I don't know why the race director, or the UCI juror think it was acceptable, or why they feel the situation is closed roads or no race.

All the riders wanted was to be protected and not run the risk of racing amongst vehicles, you can do that with temporary road closures that the vast majority of cycling races operate with quite safely, it costs money but I believe the stage 3 start town had paid 20,000 euros to host the event, and the prize pot i believe was 50,000 euros, plus they had tv coverage,including helicopter for the whole stage (though the least said about some of the coverage when the riders stopped for a comfort break the better), there's scope as Ashleigh Moolman Passio said after the race focus on safety number 1 priority, then coverage, then prize money.

Avatar
wycombewheeler replied to STATO | 10 months ago
0 likes

But even if you can't close all the roads, you have to control the finish where riders will be flat out and jostling for position. You can hvae oncoming cars and people potentially pulling out or turning across them in the sprint.

Latest Comments