Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

The problem is cars – not time trial bikes, says Matteo Trentin

Responding to Chris Froome’s suggestion that TT bikes should be banned for safety reasons, the Italian rider said that “sharing the roads has to be nicer than it is now” and called on his fellow pros to “send a message”

Matteo Trentin has responded to Chris Froome’s suggestion that time trial bikes should be banned from professional cycling for safety reasons by arguing that the problem lies not with the type of bike being ridden, but “the amount of people in cars today”.

Following his former Ineos team-mate Egan Bernal’s devastating crash while training on his TT bike in Colombia last month, Froome – who has never recaptured his previous grand tour winning form after suffering his own career-threatening crash before the time trial stage of the 2019 Criterium du Dauphiné – posted a YouTube video earlier this month which floated the idea that time trial bikes should be banned from professional cycling. 

The four-time Tour de France winner’s suggestion echoed Tom Pidcock’s earlier comments that it is now too dangerous to train on TT bikes on public roads, though the idea was dismissed by Wout Van Aert as “bullshit”. 

> Chris Froome calls for time trial bike ban in professional cycling 

Froome’s decision to spark a debate about the use of time trial bikes in cycling was also prompted by UAE Team Emirates rider Trentin’s comments on the wider issue of rider safety, particularly concerning the inclusion of gravel sections in road races. 

The Italian classics rider is one of the peloton’s most outspoken activists on the subject of safety, and represents his fellow pros in the riders’ union, CPA, and by sitting on UCI committee meetings.

Speaking to Cyclingnews before the start of yesterday’s Omloop Het Nieuwsblad (where he would go on to finish seventh), Trentin responded to Froome’s comments by initially joking, “I will never be good in the TT, so I don't really care”. 

Turning to more serious matters, the 32-year-old said: “Of course, the point of Chris of training on the road with the TT bike is correct, but I would add that it's not a TT bike problem; the problem is the traffic, the problem is the amount of people in cars today.

“Actually, even the small roads in the countryside can be dangerous, but it's not because you have a TT bike; it's because you have a bike.

“You're not protected from crashing into a car, and people are getting more and more anxious to pass a bike for basically no reason.

“It's actually a problem of how people are thinking sitting in a car, or maybe also sometimes how cyclists are thinking sitting on a bike. It has to be nicer. Sharing the roads has to be nicer than it is now.”

> Time trial bikes now too dangerous for training on public roads, says Tom Pidcock 

When asked how the current situation on the roads can change, Trentin said that the problem goes far beyond the professional scene and, echoing the views of charity Cycling UK, argued that a long-term shift in attitudes among road users needs to occur.

“It's habit. You need to change people's minds and that takes a lot of time,” he said.

“It's not a pro cycling thing. We are a small fraction of the people biking on the road every day — a really, really small fraction.

“The bigger user of the roads on the bike are tourists or even kids going to school or people going to work, and we need to be more concerned about them than about us. It's our job, we know how to act on the road.

“Of course, an accident can be behind every corner, but if you see the statistics, it's like 99 percent of the people injured on bikes by traffic are normal people.”

Trentin called on the professional peloton to “send a message” by advocating for increased protection for cyclists on the roads, something he says which would inevitably help the long-term health of the sport.

He said his fellow pros should “be more involved in spreading the message to the world, even in the races — something we don't do for the moment. It's something like when the races become a breakthrough problem in the sport.

“Every sport sends a message. For the future of cycling, which parents are going to have their kids at 12 or 13 going on the road? I think nobody. If you want to have riders in 20 years’ time you need to solve this problem, you need to address this problem.”

Ryan joined road.cc in December 2021 and since then has kept the site’s readers and listeners informed and enthralled (well at least occasionally) on news, the live blog, and the road.cc Podcast. After boarding a wrong bus at the world championships and ruining a good pair of jeans at the cyclocross, he now serves as road.cc’s senior news writer. Before his foray into cycling journalism, he wallowed in the equally pitiless world of academia, where he wrote a book about Victorian politics and droned on about cycling and bikes to classes of bored students (while taking every chance he could get to talk about cycling in print or on the radio). He can be found riding his bike very slowly around the narrow, scenic country lanes of Co. Down.

Add new comment

6 comments

Avatar
visionset | 2 years ago
1 like

He's absolutely right. The key message is

Quote:

“It's not a pro cycling thing. We are a small fraction of the people biking on the road every day — a really, really small fraction.

Presence on the road is essential. As a cyclist, spendig time on the actual road, mixing with traffic.  It's the best thing you can do to further the cause for everyone.

Avatar
Jimwill | 2 years ago
0 likes

Why do people bother giving that oxygen thief the time of day.

Avatar
PRSboy replied to Lance ꜱtrongarm | 2 years ago
10 likes

Lance Strongarm wrote:

Perhaps you could ask Trentin a follow up question as to which driver was at fault when Froome crashed into the side of a house and when Bernal crashed into the back of a parked bus

You've utterly missed his point. 

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to PRSboy | 2 years ago
7 likes

PRSboy wrote:

Lance Strongarm wrote:

Perhaps you could ask Trentin a follow up question as to which driver was at fault when Froome crashed into the side of a house and when Bernal crashed into the back of a parked bus

You've utterly missed his point. 

Not so much missed as carefully avoided - probably now following Highways Code publicity they passed it a couple of meters away.

Avatar
Captain Badger replied to PRSboy | 2 years ago
5 likes
PRSboy wrote:

...

You've utterly missed his point. 

You sound surprised...

Avatar
rct replied to Lance ꜱtrongarm | 2 years ago
0 likes

You could ask Pidcock of course.

Latest Comments