- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
news
Clevedon seafront's 'wavy' one-way street (credit - Save Our Seafront)Senior RAC figure hails "common sense has prevailed" as "bizarre" wiggly cycle lane to be removed
The head of policy for car insurance and breakdown cover provider the RAC has declared it is "good to see common sense has prevailed" after an independent review recommended a "bizarre" seafront road layout, with a cycle lane and eye-catching wiggly lines, should be reversed and car parking restored.
Commenting to GB News, Simon Williams said common sense had "prevailed over the bizarre Clevedon seafront road scheme" and that "locals will now be celebrating that more people will be able to park and enjoy looking at the seas and the historic pier as well as visiting hospitality businesses".
Last week, North Somerset Council's leader apologised to residents over the £1.3 million redesign, which a campaign group named Save Our Seafront branded a "Mickey Mouse" layout that had made the town the "laughing stock of the nation" and "Balamory from hell".
A series of protests followed, including a seafront conga line and parking "flash mob" to block the cycle lane, and led to the council ordering an independent review, which has now recommended the two-way cycle lane be removed and sea-facing parking restored.
"Many will also be thinking how so much tax-payers money could have been spent on such a simple scheme, let alone one which turned out to be so deeply unpopular," Mr Williams continued.
"There are also surely questions to be answered as to how this was ever classed as an 'active travel' scheme considering how short the cycle lane is. For this reason, we struggle to see how this would ever help to get people out of their cars, which was one of the stated aims of the project."
Last week, council leader Mike Bell said it was a "big mistake" and the local authority had "got it wrong". He also committed to removing the infrastructure at an estimated further cost of £375,000.
"We'll have to try to find the money — it's not going to be easy, but we will try to do that," he said. "The big mistake was that we implemented a scheme that wasn't supported by the community and I'm really sorry that happened.
"We didn't get the consultation and engagement right, it took place during the Covid pandemic and, as a result, we've delivered a scheme that didn't work for people. We're under immense financial pressure, as are all councils. I would not wish to be in this position if we could have avoided it.
"But the right thing to do is to try to deliver some changes and deliver a scheme that works for the people of Clevedon and that's what we're going to try to do."
The comments marked the end of an 11-month period of protests and campaigning following the unveiling of the new layout in January, pictures of the "wiggly line" design appearing across the media and social media.
While a public consultation found that 50 per cent of locals supported the plans, compared to 42 per cent who opposed the scheme, since the initiative was announced 'Save Our Seafront' has led a high-profile campaign against the redevelopment and penned a petition to the council which attracted over 6,000 signatures.
Dan is the road.cc news editor and has spent the past four years writing stories and features, as well as (hopefully) keeping you entertained on the live blog. Having previously written about nearly every other sport under the sun for the Express, and the weird and wonderful world of non-league football for the Non-League Paper, Dan joined road.cc in 2020. Come the weekend you'll find him labouring up a hill, probably with a mouth full of jelly babies, or making a bonk-induced trip to a south of England petrol station... in search of more jelly babies.
Latest Comments
- john_smith 58 min 56 sec ago
I always that it came across as fake and not very nice.
- john_smith 1 hour 4 min ago
Yup. The only conceivable consequence of hitting a pothole one-handed whilst concentrating on everything but the road is that your phone will be...
- chrisonabike 1 hour 55 min ago
Well good for Yate! Looking on Street view the 2021 pictures suggest nothing less than a genuinely "massive" amount of cash * will help. That...
- Blackthorne 3 hours 4 min ago
Well Paddy Murray seems to have been nicely rewarded for his efforts to drive Stages into the ground.
- Rizzo27 5 hours 52 min ago
I’ve found Specialized to be well put together and refined but not necessarily budget. I had a RadWagon before my Specialized Vado 4 and the level...
- stonojnr 6 hours 52 min ago
but I thought that was the Avanti process, your bike doesnt get in the special cycle storage carriage without a printed reservation, that you then...
- stonojnr 7 hours 20 min ago
he could get one of those flame thrower dog robots, might concentrate the minds of the drivers abit, the speed detector signs that article talks...
- grOg 15 hours 15 min ago
As soon as I saw the video, I thought; unlicensed rider, stolen bike with stolen plates; that sort of criminal wouldn't give a second thought about...
- NOtotheEU 16 hours 51 min ago
I recieved an email this week from a WMP officer drafted in to help as they were overwhelmed with submissions and falling behind. It said two of...
Add new comment
14 comments
So I live in clevedon. On occasion I talk to people from places other than clevedon. None of them laugh at me for infrastructure changes. I conclude that clevedon being 'the laughing stock on the nation' is utter bollox.
Also that photo is old. The wiggly lines are gone ages ago.
Would be nice if we could divert some of the £375k to fix the condemmed skatepark and build a long promised pump track. Something actually beneficial to the community..
This may be a controversial view but I honestly think if money is tight you're better off adding ASLs and maybe separate lights for cyclists at junctions than adding a long stretch of paint to a road.
Basically focus on improving your junctions first.
Agree to some of this. Paint is pretty pointless. Pointillism (advisory cycle lanes) is perfectly pointless.
Also agree that junctions are of key importance. But... NOT ASLs! Here's what we need (for mass cycling). Or the "invented here" version (doesn't seem bad, but barely tested - why do we always need to do this?)
Unfortunately fixing junctions seems to be really hard in the UK. It will involve cost, and troubling those driving (and maybe even walking). There WILL be disruption while making the changes and junctions are chokepoints for cars so "but congestion!" will be brought up. It might mean tweaking rules.
It's also making a very visible positive choice that yes, we really do want to make cycling safer and more attractive. No "quiet back streets route" or "just put up a sign on a path" somewhere.
So it's politically very risky. And maybe legally - junctions tend to be where the crashes occur so if you do something different (or just change something) and a crash happens... (At least it was only a cyclist though.)
Early release lights for cyclists (unless this is on the cyclists' own separate infra)? Hmm... we have these in Edinburgh and sometimes twitchy drivers think they're for them.
ASLs? Probably about as good as magic paint. Maybe worse as have their own issues. I tend to ignore them. I find motor vehicles in them as frequently as parked in cycle lanes if not more. If you filter into them then you may incourage MGIF when the lights change.
Not sure they really help people shift lanes either. I'm not a shrinking violet but I don't tend to feel comfy doing so at at local 3 lane junction (busy 40mph road with lots of buses and coaches, junction at the crest of a hill. Good luck getting there by "taking the lane" earlier if busy...)
The cycle lane needs to be wobbly because that's how be bikers ride
So that's where they went wrong, the wobbly line needed to be in the cycle lane as opposed to where they actually put it ! Now we know!
Also, he clearly didn't read the review. Removal was recommended but they acknowledged there's no money for that, and it goes against the active travel agenda.
Simon Williams ???
Are you sure Dan - you haven't got muddled up with NewsThump have you ?!
Not sure what NewsThump is, but RAC are calling him Simon Williams as well:
RAC News Coverage
Edit: just looked up NewsThump. It says spoof news, but i'm sure i've seen some of those stories in GB News headlines....
Simon Williams or a variation on that name is nearly always a spokesman in an article.
The internet is quite the minefield. Too many secret codewords and now there are code names! I'm sure the name "Karen" is code for something/someone as well. How do people keep up?!
Luckily here on road.cc a name is just a marker of identity, and as unique and immutable as a numberplate.
That was my first thought (but I suppose there must be real people with that name...)
"more people will be able to park and enjoy looking at the seas and the historic pier as well as visiting hospitality businesses".
How odd, I reckon a decent bike rack will park six or eight bikes in the space required by just one SUV. And I will pretty much guarantee six or eight cyclists eat far more cake and ice-cream on a visit to the seafront than even the most corpulent SUV driver and passenger or two.
Fixed it.