Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Video: Shared use shenanigans - rider races himself on road vs new infrastructure

There's only ever going to be one winner here - but some of it looks like a decent route for slower riders...

A road.cc reader has raced himself on the road against riding the same route on a new shared-use path - and there's no prizes for guessing which was quicker.

The video, from Dave in Dorset - a regular contributor to our Near Miss of the Day feature - was shot on Wallisdown Road in Poole.

We featured a similar video from Bristol back in December.

> Video: Cyclist times himself on new Bristol cycle path - and finds it's WAY quicker sticking to the road

In that case too, it turned out to be much quicker to be on the road rather than the shared-use path.

Of course, we are big fans here at road.cc of fully segregated infrastructure that keeps cyclists away from both motor vehicles and pedestrians.

But, with anecdotal evidence suggesting that more people are taking to bikes during the current lockdown, whether for infrastructure or commuting to key jobs, where that does not exist, shared use paths do cater to the needs of slower, less confident riders.

For the more experienced, of course, the orad remains there.

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

24 comments

Avatar
BIRMINGHAMisaDUMP | 3 years ago
3 likes

i was on a section of wide shared path the other day riding respectfully as I always do when there are dogs and people around when a gentleman waved me down. I slowed to almost track stand and he sarcastically said 'the Tour de France is cancelled this year' (I was riding a Condor Fratello with mud guards, rack and pannier and no lycra so hardly a boy racer) Under normal circumstances I would have told him to f**k right off. But in keeping with the spirit of the age I smiled and said 'oh, ok that's good 'cos I'm training for the Giro'. And pootled off.  

Avatar
miekwidnes | 3 years ago
3 likes

Round here there are lots of shared use paths - some of which work just fine

BUT - most seem to have been designed by someone who knows what a cyclist is, and probably rode a bike when he (probably) was a teenager but not for a long time - and certainly not on a shared path.

Hence - sometimes they carry on for a long time on a main road and work just fine - then another will go along a similar road witha  factory (or similar) every 50 yards-  and hence an entrance and it is edged by concrete ramps with a 1 inch lip - fun when you hit them at speed!!!

 

And in other places it all looks fine until you realise you are in an area with a lot of road junctions and the cars (etc) have to stop once at traffice lights - but cyclists on the path have to stop, pre4ss the button, wait for green light- and then cross - FOUR TIMES instead of once.

Great design and implementation - but should have asked a cyclistbefore doing it!!

 

Oh - and a few signs shoing that this is a cycle path would be nice - I lived here nearlya  year before I worked out which paths were shared cycle paths and which not - and it would be nice to have a sign that shows where they end as well!!!

Avatar
brooksby replied to miekwidnes | 3 years ago
2 likes

miekwidnes wrote:

BUT - most seem to have been designed by someone who knows what a cyclist is, and probably rode a bike when he (probably) was a teenager but not for a long time - and certainly not on a shared path.

This!  Agree completely.

Avatar
Mungecrundle | 3 years ago
3 likes

When they overtake you and pull in across the path in front of you.

Avatar
Mungecrundle | 3 years ago
3 likes

When you have to yield at every side road and obscured entrance.

Avatar
Sriracha | 3 years ago
1 like

Not sure what point the video is trying to make, beyond the obvious; that shared use paths are no use for people who are not content to share if sharing means they are inconvenienced. And yes, I know, dog lead, too long, Highway Code, etc. There were plenty other inconveniences too. And some could be ameliorated for sure.

Shared use paths are great for occasional cyclists, families out with kids, or just not in a hurry. But for a cyclist "on a mission" - be that the daily commute or a Strava leg - the imperative to "must not lose momentum" is every bit as strong as is MGIF for car drivers.

Avatar
Hirsute replied to Sriracha | 3 years ago
4 likes

I thought it was about an indirect route, poor signage, lack of clarity as to where it stops and starts and continues and at the end, the point was made about the return journey - how do you get on this cycle path ?

Avatar
brooksby | 3 years ago
2 likes

Quote:

In that case too, it turned out to be much quicker to be on the road rather than the shared-use path.

And in other news...

Bears/woods.

Pope/Catholic.

Trump/self-centred idiocy.

Avatar
CXR94Di2 | 3 years ago
1 like

Why doesnt the government just have strict liability and presumed liability for vehicle drivers to protect walkers and cyclists+horse n riders etc

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to CXR94Di2 | 3 years ago
3 likes

CXR94Di2 wrote:

Why doesnt the government just have strict liability and presumed liability for vehicle drivers to protect walkers and cyclists+horse n riders etc

I think that's part of the announced comprehensive review into road traffic safety/sentencing...

Avatar
brooksby replied to hawkinspeter | 3 years ago
3 likes

hawkinspeter wrote:

CXR94Di2 wrote:

Why doesnt the government just have strict liability and presumed liability for vehicle drivers to protect walkers and cyclists+horse n riders etc

I think that's part of the announced comprehensive review into road traffic safety/sentencing...

I'm sure they'll get around to that eventually...  It's only been ten years or so, hasn't it?

Avatar
Grigor | 3 years ago
1 like

It's a crap cycle path, and money that could have certainly been better invested has been wasted.

But I don't understand the urgency to get passed the old guy walking his dog (at the start of the video). Swap him for a cyclist and the cyclist for a car and it's got all the elements that cause us issues on the road: vulnerable user, pinch point, MGIF syndrome. Or is the argument that despite inherent benefits the slower user should yeild to faster transport options?

No doubt it was included to highlight that shared use paths are a pain in the ass. They are. They're no substitute for good cycle infrastructure. But they have a shared purpose and annoying the other users doesn't get anyone anywhere fast.

The sooner an increased portion of road (and path) users adopt a friendly, shared, help-the-flow approach the better.

Avatar
nappe replied to Grigor | 3 years ago
6 likes

Cyclist slowed down to a safe speed, rang a bell, politely asked to come past. Cyclist was legally using a shared path.

Walker didn't acknowledge the cyclist, made no attempt to stick to one side of the path and, in fact, by using an extendable dog lead, took up as much space as possible.

I don't think that this was a case of MGIF, there was plenty of space for a safe pass if the walker hadn't deliberately blocked the path.

Avatar
Hirsute replied to Grigor | 3 years ago
5 likes

I think you missed the bit where the lead was about 10m long and the bloke and dog were taking up a huge amount of space.
Also it was unclear whether the bloke had any idea that there was a cyclist and what would happen if the dog suddenly ran towards the cyclist.
56
Dogs. Do not let a dog out on the road on its own. Keep it on a short lead when walking on the pavement, road or path shared with cyclists or horse riders.

Avatar
the little onion replied to Grigor | 3 years ago
4 likes

I don't see it as a MGIF, more as a polite notice on a shared use path that the other user should not block the path, as per the highway code. There is clearly room for both of them in this context, if the dog was a bit closer and on a proper lead

 

According to the highway code, the dog owner is at fault

Rule "56 Dogs. Do not let a dog out on the road on its own. Keep it on a short lead when walking on the pavement, road or path shared with cyclists or horse riders." (highlight for emphasis)

 

Avatar
brooksby replied to Grigor | 3 years ago
3 likes

Grigor wrote:

But I don't understand the urgency to get passed the old guy walking his dog (at the start of the video). Swap him for a cyclist and the cyclist for a car and it's got all the elements that cause us issues on the road: vulnerable user, pinch point, MGIF syndrome. Or is the argument that despite inherent benefits the slower user should yeild to faster transport options?

I think a closer analogy would be if the dog walker was a rider bumbling along down the middle of a single track road while a queue of fifty tractors and ambulances built up behind them.  Actually, no that doesn't work either.

I suspect the dog walker knew full well that the cyclist was there, but had decided that the cyclist ought not to be "on the footpath" and so they were going to be as passive-aggressively obstructive as they possibly could.

Avatar
Gary's bike channel replied to brooksby | 3 years ago
2 likes

i said it very clearly and loudly, twice to him, and he did seem to twist his head at me, so yes i think he knew i was there but thought sod it, im walking my dog so i'll ignore him. Then when i did go past, i had a feeling the dog was going to lunge at me, which they often do.  The general point of the video was for three reasons,one, bad signage, the council need to do it properly and make it clear which way to go, not just have it stop suddenly. Youll end up having old people on the pavement run over by cyclists thinking they're still on a shared path, or uni students taken out whilst staring at their phones not realising theyre walking where cyclists will now be riding. It gets very hectic in there in summer as it is.  The other point was how do you get to it, if coming from the other way. Its impossible. I cannot see how they could make it so you cross over, without being hit by a car from the other way, to join the path, especially if buses are pulled in where i went up the ramp. Only way would be turn right in the junction road, bump up the kerb, then follow it onwards, but thats stupid. I swear the council should just grab a dutch cycle path designer and make them do it, because no council ive seen in britain has a clue how to design something that works for a cyclist. A child going at 5 miles an hour to school, yes. But not for someone cycling up to 30 mph. All it does is lead to yet more ignorant morons in car yelling at cyclists to use something either substandard or downright dangerous, and i feel this new [design] is going to do just that. 

Avatar
Organon | 3 years ago
3 likes

The only winner is Entropy.

Avatar
Hirsute | 3 years ago
5 likes

There had to be someone with a long extendable dog lead.

Avatar
the little onion replied to Hirsute | 3 years ago
3 likes

Which, of course, is not allowed under the highway code:

"56 Dogs. Do not let a dog out on the road on its own. Keep it on a short lead when walking on the pavement, road or path shared with cyclists or horse riders."
"

Avatar
Hirsute replied to the little onion | 3 years ago
0 likes

The analogy I would use for cyclists and cars is if you were on a going slowy on a narrow road oblivious to traffic behind and wouldn't pull in to obvious laybys or stopping places to let people by.

Avatar
ktache | 3 years ago
2 likes

Can we please call it seperated or protected infrastructure.

Segregation is wrong.

Avatar
Michael Scott replied to ktache | 3 years ago
2 likes

Don't think I'll ever call it seperated infra

separated maybe

Avatar
I love my bike replied to Michael Scott | 3 years ago
5 likes

I headed off to orad.cc but the spooling & last paragraph's no better there  1

Latest Comments