Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Taxi association warns drivers of "sneaky" cyclists with cameras catching law-breaking behaviour

A Licensed Taxi Driver’s Association (LTDA) representative claimed that 90% of reports submitted to the police came from cyclists

A concerned taxi driver's association rep has warned cabbies of cyclists' "sneaky" cameras costing professional drivers fines and penalty points.

Speaking to TAXI Newspaper, a publication of the Licensed Taxi Driver's Association (LTDA), LTDA executive Lloyd Baldwin urged drivers to avoid being "tempted to pick up your mobile phone", not because of the danger a distraction could cause other road users, but because of those pesky cyclists with their helmet cameras.

Telling the tale of one member who received a fixed penalty notice for six points and a £200 fine, Baldwin explained how the driver requested a copy of the video footage which he then forwarded on to the LTDA.

> Here's what to do if you capture a near miss, close pass or collision on camera while cycling

"He didn't remember any such incident and had not been approached by a police officer," Baldwin explained. "I advised that it was probably a report from a cyclist or possibly a member of the public and suggested that he contacted the police explaining that he didn't know of any incident and to ask them to email him the evidence against him.

"I told him to relay to the police that he didn't want to plead not guilty, then attend court only for the police to produce evidence which showed him making an error he was unaware of. The police agreed and sent him a video.

"The member emailed the video to me. What I watched showed just how sneaky these cyclists can be."

Explaining what happened, the LTDA rep says the cyclist struck up a conversation with the driver so he could get footage of his law-breaking.

"Picture the scene. Our member is sitting in Sloane Street traffic, northbound at the lights with Knightsbridge," Baldwin continued. "A cyclist drives past and has a look through his driver's window. The cyclist saw that the cabbie had his phone in his hand. The cyclist carried on, but then reversed back and started a conversation with the cabbie about how a car had stopped in the cycle box.

"Obviously, the cabbie showed no interest and gave him a look of 'so what?'. Little did he realise, the reason for the conversation was so the cyclist could film the member up close and report him to the police.

"Of course, the cabbie was unknowingly guilty and will have to face the consequences, but it goes to show you can never be too careful. I may sound like a broken record and friends of mine suggest I write about something else (they are happy to tell me how boring I am), but I know what damage these six points can do to a cabbie.

"So please be careful. In my experience, 90 per cent of reports made to the police are from cyclists."

Reports to police of law breaking and dangerous driving on Britain's roads are on the rise, with a 25 per cent increase in video submissions reported in the first three months after last year's Highway Code changes.

Regular readers of this website will no doubt be familiar with CyclingMikey, one of the cyclists regularly reporting drivers using their phones behind the wheel, and who also uploads videos like the one below to his YouTube channel.

Last week an Edinburgh cyclist, driven off social media by abuse from trolls, said he would not give up on reporting dangerous motorists he captures on his helmet camera.

Speaking to, Edinburgh-based cyclist Deacon Thurston argued that the "societal acceptance" of anti-cycling attitudes – strikingly evident in the recent campaign against him, which saw one Twitter user invite others to join him on a "hit-and-run" – is a key barrier to coaxing people out of their cars and towards more sustainable modes of transport.

Phone drivers (Twitter/@DeaconThurston)

Thurston began regularly reporting and posting videos of law-breaking drivers on Twitter and YouTube just over a year ago, after being involved in an altercation with a motorist that the police couldn't pursue due to a lack of evidence and witnesses.

"Two days later I became GoPro's newest customer and I've recorded every ride since," he told us.

"I report as much of the bad and dangerous driving to the police as I can possibly manage, the rest has tended to find its way onto Twitter and YouTube to raise awareness of just how widespread this behaviour is."

Dan joined in 2020, and spent most of his first year (hopefully) keeping you entertained on the live blog. At the start of 2022 he took on the role of news editor. Before joining, Dan wrote about various sports, including football and boxing for the Daily Express, and covered the weird and wonderful world of non-league football for The Non-League Paper. Part of the generation inspired by the 2012 Olympics, Dan has been 'enjoying' life on two wheels ever since and spends his weekends making bonk-induced trips to the petrol stations of the south of England.

Add new comment


grOg replied to Sriracha | 9 months ago


In Australia, the road rule only states you must be parked to use a mobile phone in a motor vehicle; there is no prohibition regarding the engine being on; many people legally park with the engine on, to keep certain vehicle functions operating, such as air conditioning.

'Using a hand-held mobile phone is also illegal when your vehicle is stationary but not parked e.g. when you’re stopped at traffic lights.'

Jimmy Ray Will replied to ktache | 9 months ago
1 like

I get this... it's like speeding isn't it? The law states that travelling at 34mph in a 30 zone is speeding, and travelling at 50mph in a 30mph zone are both speeding. 

Many motorists will regularly decide that 34mph is worth the risk, whilst I'm sure that very few will be willing to take a punt at driving at 50mph in a 30 zone.

Problem as I see it is that the punishment for momentarily looking at your screen whilst in a traffic queue is the same as writing text messages or taking a call at 75mph on a motorway. 

Personally if someone looks at their screen whilst stationary, I don't care. It's doing absolutely no harm, as long as they stay aware of what's happening in front and pop the phone down as soon as the traffic starts moving. I appreciate however that the human condition dictates that people can't be trusted to do that. 

Is there an argument for scaling punishments for phone use in the same way as speeding? Would this help negate the 'I was just...' argument/ justification. 

ktache replied to Jimmy Ray Will | 9 months ago

It's an addiction.

Those on their fix at 75mph are using while in traffic.

And those only abusing when stationary, don't stop getting high when the traffic moves along a bit.

giff77 replied to Jimmy Ray Will | 9 months ago

It's been shown that it takes a motorist 2/3 seconds to fully refocus from looking at a screen while stationary and then moving off. I've repeatedly witnessed phone users dropping their phone then jumping lights in a panic. Or nearly shunting the car in front as they close the WhatsApp Gap. 


Latest Comments