Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Is the Tour de France now all about Mark Cavendish? When could Cav match Eddy Merckx's record?

Cav might not want to talk about it, but he is one win away from a slice of cycling history. We have taken a look at the route to see when he could bag the big one...

Another sprint stage, another win for the Manx Missile. Having notched up number 33 this afternoon Mark Cavendish is now just one win away from matching Eddy Merckx's famous Tour de France record.

It’s a topic the 36-year-old himself avoids, attributing it to press talk – but his wins in Fougères and Chateauroux last week, his first at the Tour de France in five years, followed by another dominant victory today have made the question of whether he will pass the Belgian’s total one of the big sub-plots of this year’s race.

It is already a compelling sporting comeback story, not least because of Cavendish’s struggles with injury and illness in recent seasons, but the fact that he missed the past two editions through non-selection and only secured a contract for this season in December, only being called up to participate in the race days before it began.

There are four more stages that should, on paper, finish in bunch sprints – including in Nîmes on Thursday, where he has won before, and in Paris on the final day, where he triumphed on the Champs-Elysées four times in a row from 2009-12.

Stage 12: Thursday 8th July 

TdF 2021 Stage 12 profile.jpg

Stage 13: Friday 9th July

If Stage 12 to Nîmes does not work out then Quick-Step should get another chance on Friday in Carcassonne. If the wind blows, as it often does in this part of France, then you can almost guarantee Cavendish's Belgian team will be at the front, animating the race.

TdF 2021 Stage 13 profile.jpg

Stage 19: Friday 16th July

Stage 19 offers the final sprint opportunity before Paris, but with tired legs and minds it would not be out of the question for a determined breakaway to outfox the sprinters' teams.

TdF 2021 Stage 19 profile.jpg

Stage 21: Sunday 18th July

What odds Cavendish has his hands in the air for number 35 in The City of Light a week on Sunday? Now that would be some story.

TdF 2021 Stage 21 profile.jpg

> Tour de France 2021 stage-by-stage preview

With Lotto-Soudal’s Caleb Ewan crashing out on Stage 3, and Alpecin-Fenix’s Tim Merlier (winner of the sprint that day) and Arnaud Démare of Groupama-FDJ both outside the time limit at Tignes on Sunday, a number of his chief sprint rivals are out of the race.

Cavendish himself made it home just inside the time limit for the second successive day, helped by some of his Deceuninck-Quick Step team-mates, whom he has consistently praised throughout the race.

Speaking on yesterday’s rest day, he said: “These moments ... it's not just what you win, it's how you win it. Even if we stop now, this has been one of the nicest Tours.

"[Michael] Morkov is the best lead-out in the world,” Cavendish continued. “He's calm, like the anti-me.

“They are more than a lead-out, they are a team – I'm lucky to have these guys.”

Michael Matthews of Team BikeExchange and Italian champion Sonny Colbrelli of Bahrain Victorious have emerged as the strongest challengers to Cavendish in the points classification, a contest he won in 2011.

So far, he has proved faster than either of them in sprint finishes contested head-to-head – he did not contest Stage 3 in Pontivy after his front wheel was damaged in a late crash – but they have picked up points at intermediate sprints where early climbs have enabled them to distance the Manxman.

This was the case with today's intermediate sprint which came at the top of a 3km, 5 per cent climb, and saw Colbrelli and Matthews take 15 and 13 points respectively to Cavendish's blank.

However, any gains were lost at the finish with the green jersey claiming another 50 points on the line to bump up his tally to 218 and extend his advantage on his Australian rival to 59 points.

Another tactic they may employ to remove Cavendish as a rival for the green jersey is to have their teams force the pace on mountain stages to try and make it impossible for him to make it across the line within the time limit.

While the race jury has the discretion to allow riders to continue, even if they miss the time cut – as happens when a large group is outside the time limit – any points accumulated in the race to date are taken away, a scenario that would effectively remove Cavendish from the equation.

Getting through tomorrow's monster double-ascent of Mont Ventoux will do his confidence no harm.

Yesterday he explained why sprinters seem to struggle on mountain stages, saying: “There's a common misconception we can't climb and it's through lack of training or laziness or a lack of ability to suffer.”

He said that the opposite was the case – “Those who are slowest are suffering the most. Our bodies aren't designed to do that.

“When you've got fast-twitch muscles you're not designed to go uphill at a steady pace for a long amount of time.

“It takes a different toll on the body and sometimes your muscles just stop working and that’s the hardest thing, to push through that.”

Acknowledging that "There's a lot less sprinters” left in the race now, he said: “We've got a strong group with experience who know how to control a race so we just have to hope for the best."

Cavendish is already the most successful sprinter in the history of the race, in 2012 passing André Darrigard’s total of 22 stages, accumulated between 1953 and 1964.

By the end of the 2016 race, his total stood at 30, and it seemed just a matter of time that he would pass five-time yellow jersey winner Eddy Merckx’s total of 34, which includes 20 individual time trials.

Last week’s brace of victories are Cavendish's first at the Tour de France in five years, however, as he crashed out in 2017 and struggled with illness the following year, and missed selection for the race in both 2019 and 2020.

Following last year’s short, coronavirus-affected season with WorldTour action packed into a short window from August to November, it seemed that his top-level career might be flight – until Patrick Lefevere brought him back to Deceuninck-Quick Step on a one year contract.

Even then, he had been set to miss this year’s race, too, until being called up to replace the injured Sam Bennett just a week before the Grand Depart in Brittany.

He also drew parallels on the rest day with his battle back from injury and illness, and that of Chris Froome, the four-time champion taking part in the race for the first time since his horrendous crash a month before the 2018 edition.

“I can talk from personal experience – you don't write somebody off," he insisted. "It's down to the individual, how long they want to do something and what they feel they can come back to.

“Unless you are that person you can never understand. Chris Froome has been a champion for many years. Very, very few people in the world can get to that level so people will not understand the mindset, and understand the fight to get back...

“Froomey is a friend of mine but even if it was somebody I didn't like, if I saw somebody being able to suffer physically and mentally to try to come back to somewhere they were and they know where they can get to, I applaud it, it's the strongest thing you can do,” Cavendish added.

With Tadej Pogacar looking like he's going to cruise to a second yellow jersey, is the Tour de France all about Cav now? Let us know your thoughts in the comments as always. 

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

22 comments

Avatar
Rick_Rude | 2 years ago
0 likes

Must say I was a Cav sceptic after the last few years. It would be nice to see a piece of history though.

Avatar
kil0ran | 2 years ago
5 likes

Come for the discussion of Cav's win, stay for 14 posts from the grammar police.

The way he's talking about the green jersey suggests that he thinks he might not get to Paris. Tomorrow is brutal, although rain looks likely, which will probably help. It's whether he can get through the Pyrenees, it's a very big ask, even if DQT go all-in on pacing him in the grupetto

Avatar
Secret_squirrel | 2 years ago
0 likes

Its not all about Cav - there'll be attempts to break Pogocar - if only to sound him out for the next tours.

It will certainly be interesting to see how the Green Jersey battle plays out.  I get the feeling (based on ignorance!) that Cav is a better pure sprinter than both the closest contenders so it could come down to them trying to hoover up points on the lumpier stages - especially after Colbrelli's performance in Tignes.

Having not spent much time before this watching the TDF, whats Cav's reputation/ability on the semi-lumpy stuff like today (Stage 10).  Is he in with a shot for the intermediate or just looking to score at the end?

DQ seem to have the in-form sprint train at the moment too so as long as there aren't too many places where they'll be supporting Asgreen or Alaphillipe for a stage win simultaneously as trying to support Cav - it seems like he's in with a shot at the record - if not the green jersey overall - having to get over the all the rest of the lumpy stuff for that.

Fingers crossed for him.  Its a fairy tale now - if he keeps green to the finish or the stages record he'll be talked about as even more of a legend for years to come.

Avatar
CXR94Di2 replied to Secret_squirrel | 2 years ago
0 likes

GC is over, there is no one who can take 5+ mins off him

Avatar
peted76 | 2 years ago
4 likes

It's not 'all about' Cav.. but I'm more invested in sprint stages than I have been for a very long time. 

My 'problem' with the GC battle is not that Pog is looking like the strongest or that he is boring to watch (he's an amazing rider to watch!) but that I have no real investment in the people vying for the runner up spots. 

Maybe it's because there seems to be so many younger riders and we (I) just haven't gotten used to them yet.. maybe it's because they have no personality (I'm looking at you Nairo), whatever it is, there is something less interesting about the GC battle now that Pog has showed us that he's an absolute monster on a bike.

Avatar
wtjs replied to peted76 | 2 years ago
3 likes

we (I) just haven't gotten used to them yet.

We don't say 'gotten' in the UK!

Avatar
Captain Badger replied to wtjs | 2 years ago
8 likes
wtjs wrote:

we (I) just haven't gotten used to them yet.

We don't say 'gotten' in the UK!

Sure we do, you just ain't gotten used to it

Avatar
mdavidford replied to Captain Badger | 2 years ago
0 likes
Captain Badger wrote:
wtjs wrote:

we (I) just haven't gotten used to them yet.

We don't say 'gotten' in the UK!

Sure we do, you just ain't gotten used to it

Which begs the question - if not after a thousand years or so, how long is it going to take?

Avatar
Sniffer replied to mdavidford | 2 years ago
3 likes

'Gotten' has actually just gone out of favour.  It is used in the King James Bible and Shakespeare for example.  Rarely used in UK English now it is not an American invention that many think.

So less the last thousand years or so, more slipped out of use over the last few hundred years.

Avatar
Steve K replied to Sniffer | 2 years ago
1 like
Sniffer wrote:

'Gotten' has actually just gone out of favour.  It is used in the King James Bible and Shakespeare for example.  Rarely used in UK English now it is not an American invention that many think.

So less the last thousand years or so, more slipped out of use over the last few hundred years.

On a similar note, the American use of 'z' rather than 's' in words such as 'recognise' is actually the older English version.  The switch to 's' on this side of the Altantic was an aristocratic affectation to ape the French.

Avatar
Captain Badger replied to Steve K | 2 years ago
0 likes
Steve K wrote:

 

On a similar note, the American use of 'z' rather than 's' in words such as 'recognise' is actually the older English version.  The switch to 's' on this side of the Altantic was an aristocratic affectation to ape the French.

Are you sure? I thought it was a US attempt to standardize ahem standardise English. Other American English words also come from this attempt - sulfur, fetus, color etc.

 

 

 

Avatar
mdavidford replied to Sniffer | 2 years ago
2 likes

Reduced, but not slipped out of use - it's been used continuously throughout. Even at the turn of the last century it seems to have been more common than it is today, and its low point was only mid-20th century, since when it's begun to revive. US usage follows a similar pattern, except that it doesn't continue to decline into the 20th century, and the revival is much more pronounced.

And this is in written English, which would tend to be more formal - it's almost certainly remained rather more popular in vernacular usage, particularly in certain regions.

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to mdavidford | 2 years ago
2 likes
mdavidford wrote:
Captain Badger wrote:
wtjs wrote:

we (I) just haven't gotten used to them yet.

We don't say 'gotten' in the UK!

Sure we do, you just ain't gotten used to it

Which begs the question - if not after a thousand years or so, how long is it going to take?

"Raises the question" - "begs the question" is for circular arguments

Avatar
mdavidford replied to hawkinspeter | 2 years ago
0 likes
hawkinspeter wrote:
mdavidford wrote:
Captain Badger wrote:
wtjs wrote:

we (I) just haven't gotten used to them yet.

We don't say 'gotten' in the UK!

Sure we do, you just ain't gotten used to it

Which begs the question - if not after a thousand years or so, how long is it going to take?

"Raises the question" - "begs the question" is for circular arguments

Only if you're a rhetorician discussing formal logic (and who wants to be one of those?). In common usage they're interchangeable.

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to mdavidford | 2 years ago
3 likes
mdavidford wrote:
hawkinspeter wrote:
mdavidford wrote:
Captain Badger wrote:
wtjs wrote:

we (I) just haven't gotten used to them yet.

We don't say 'gotten' in the UK!

Sure we do, you just ain't gotten used to it

Which begs the question - if not after a thousand years or so, how long is it going to take?

"Raises the question" - "begs the question" is for circular arguments

Only if you're a rhetorician discussing formal logic (and who wants to be one of those?). In common usage they're interchangeable.

Hardly interchangable when they have two different uses, but I agree that a lot of people incorrectly use "begs the question" whereas almost no-one incorrectly uses "raises the question".

Anyhow, I thought this was literally the grammar thread?

Avatar
mdavidford replied to hawkinspeter | 2 years ago
1 like
hawkinspeter wrote:
mdavidford wrote:
hawkinspeter wrote:

...

"Raises the question" - "begs the question" is for circular arguments

Only if you're a rhetorician discussing formal logic (and who wants to be one of those?). In common usage they're interchangeable.

Hardly interchangable when they have two different uses, but I agree that a lot of people incorrectly use "begs the question" whereas almost no-one incorrectly uses "raises the question".

Anyhow, I thought this was literally the grammar thread?

Quote:

Begging the question means "to elicit a specific question as a reaction or response," and can often be replaced with "a question that begs to be answered." However, a lesser used and more formal definition is "to ignore a question under the assumption it has already been answered." The phrase itself comes from a translation of an Aristotelian phrase rendered as "beg the question" but meaning "assume the conclusion."

https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/beg-the-question

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to mdavidford | 2 years ago
2 likes
mdavidford wrote:
hawkinspeter wrote:
mdavidford wrote:
hawkinspeter wrote:

...

"Raises the question" - "begs the question" is for circular arguments

Only if you're a rhetorician discussing formal logic (and who wants to be one of those?). In common usage they're interchangeable.

Hardly interchangable when they have two different uses, but I agree that a lot of people incorrectly use "begs the question" whereas almost no-one incorrectly uses "raises the question".

Anyhow, I thought this was literally the grammar thread?

Quote:

Begging the question means "to elicit a specific question as a reaction or response," and can often be replaced with "a question that begs to be answered." However, a lesser used and more formal definition is "to ignore a question under the assumption it has already been answered." The phrase itself comes from a translation of an Aristotelian phrase rendered as "beg the question" but meaning "assume the conclusion."

https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/beg-the-question

Typical. Using facts to prove your point.

I'm sticking with https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Begging_the_question

Avatar
Captain Badger replied to hawkinspeter | 2 years ago
1 like
hawkinspeter wrote:

....

Anyhow, I thought this was literally the grammar thread?

I saw what you did there, you little tinker.

Avatar
Captain Badger replied to mdavidford | 2 years ago
3 likes
mdavidford wrote:

.....

Which begs the question - if not after a thousand years or so, how long is it going to take?

Scheduled at around the same time as the promised review into road law.....

Avatar
peted76 replied to wtjs | 2 years ago
11 likes

Thank you for your contribution to this thread, I now feel most better.

 

This week I are mostly be doing grammar. 

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to wtjs | 2 years ago
6 likes
wtjs wrote:

we (I) just haven't gotten used to them yet.

We don't say 'gotten' in the UK!

With much ado at length have gotten leave,
To look upon my sometimes royal master’s face.

Shakespeare, Richard III, Act V Scene v (several other instances in the canon). And have you never used or heard the phrase "ill-gotten gains"?

Avatar
TheBillder replied to Rendel Harris | 2 years ago
0 likes

Terrific, I had forgotten all of my Shakespeare.

Latest Comments