Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Unlimited exercise allowed from Wednesday, says PM Boris Johnson – although existing legislation placed no limits

People who can't work from home encouraged to return to work, but ideally commuting on foot or by bike...

Prime Minister Boris Johnson has this evening said that from Wednesday, people in England will be allowed "unlimited outdoor exercise" as he set out the government's "roadmap" to ease lockdown restrictions – aIthough according to the letter of existing legislation, there were no such limits on exercise. He also said that people unable to work from home, such as construction or factory workers, are advised to return to work from tomorrow but to avoid public transport and to travel only "by car or even better by walking or by bicycle."

In his address, the Prime Minister said: "From this Wednesday, we want to encourage people to take more and even unlimited amounts of outdoor exercise.

"You can sit in the sun in your local park, you can drive to other destinations, you can even play sports but only with members of your own household.

"You must obey the rules on social distancing and to enforce those rules we will increase the fines for the small minority who break them."

Existing regulations place no restrictions on amount of exercise

As we’ve previously pointed out here on road.cc, emergency regulations implemented in late March in England do not in fact place restrictions on the number of times people may leave their homes to exercise each day.

> Cycling dos and don'ts in a time of pandemic – how to be a responsible cyclist

Under The Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) (England) Regulations 2020, “undertaking exercise either alone or with other members of the household” constitutes a “reasonable excuse” for leaving home.

Speaking ahead of that legislation being introduced in late March, Johnson said that people could “undertake one form of exercise” each day, with cycling being one example given, provided it is undertaken alone or with others with whom they live, something that has been reiterated in government guidance.

Last month, however, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) issued guidance to police forces in England in which it said that in relation to exercising more than once per day, “the only relevant consideration is whether repeated exercise on the same day can be considered a ‘reasonable excuse’ for leaving home.”

That guidance from the CPS, issued after the original regulations had been reconfirmed after being in force for three weeks, was drawn up partly in response to concerns that some police forces had been over-prescriptive in their interpretation of the regulations.

In part, that has been caused by confusion due to the looseness of the wording of the regulations compared to what Johnson and other cabinet members have said in public.

At the end of March, for example, Michael Gove told the BBC’s Andrew Marr, who had asked him how long exercise should ask, “Well, obviously it depends on each individual’s fitness, but I would have thought that for most people a walk of up to an hour or a run of 30 minutes or a cycle ride, depending on their level of fitness is appropriate.”

 It’s unclear whether the wording of the regulations themselves, so far as they relate to exercise, will be amended in the light of the Prime Minister’s statement this evening, but his reference to “unlimited exercise” being allowed from Wednesday should remove uncertainty about how they should be interpreted.

Regarding Johnson's references to sitting to the park in the sun, or driving to other destinations, the CPS last month said that activities "not likely to be reasonable" included "Driving for a prolonged period with only brief exercise" and "A short walk to a park bench, when the person remains seated for a much longer period."

This evening's announcement suggests that each of those is now considered by the government to be a "reasonable" excuse to leave the house and will be interpreted by nmany to do just that, exercise or not, and irrespective of the distance involved.

The reference by the Prime Minister to people being able to sit in the sun, or drive to other destinations, was greeted with dismay by tourist chiefs in Cumbria, one of the worst hit counties in England by the coronavirus.

Cumbira Tourism said: "We are shocked by the timing and short notice of tonight's announcement. We are awaiting further details but the safety of residents must come first. For now, tourism businesses in Cumbria remain closed and we urge everyone to continue to #StayHome."

People encouraged to cycle or walk to work

In the House of Commons on Tuesday, Johnson, heralded “a new golden age for cycling,” with the government underlining the importance of travelling by bike (as well as on foot) given the reduced capacity on public transport due to fewer services and social distancing, and the prospect of gridlock if people travel by car – should they have access to one at all, of course.

Yesterday, transport secretary Grant Shapps unveiled £250 million in emergency active travel funding to enable councils across England, excluding London, to put measures such as pop-up infrastructure in place to encourage cycling and walking.

> Government announces £250m emergency active travel fund as part of £2bn investment

Many people have returned to cycling or even taken it up for the first time since the lockdown began, whether doing so for exercise or to travel to work while avoiding public transport, including NHS key workers.

Johnson said this evening: "We said that you should work from home if you can, and only go to work if you must.

"We now need to stress that anyone who can’t work from home, for instance those in construction or manufacturing, should be actively encouraged to go to work.

"And we want it to be safe for you to get to work. So you should avoid public transport if at all possible – because we must and will maintain social distancing, and capacity will therefore be limited.

"So work from home if you can, but you should go to work if you can’t work from home.

"And to ensure you are safe at work we have been working to establish new guidance for employers to make workplaces COVID-secure."

He added: "And when you do go to work, if possible do so by car or even better by walking or bicycle. But just as with workplaces, public transport operators will also be following COVID-secure standards."

Again, that doesn't actually change what was already in the regulations, which say that a reasonable excuse for leaving the home includes "to travel for the purposes of work or to provide voluntary or charitable services, where it is not reasonably possible for that person to work, or to provide those services, from the place where they are living."

Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland keep 'Stay home' message

While government messaging in England is now based on the key phrase "Stay alert" - introduced this weekend to widespread confusion - the devolved administrations in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland are continuing with the "Stay home" message used ever since the lockdown was introduced at the end of March.

Ahead of Friday’s bank holiday to commemorate the 75th anniversary of Victory in Europe Day, a number of newspapers on Thursday splashed headlines across their front pages suggesting that the lockdown was being lifted.

As a result, many people in England appeared to have assumed that tonight’s address would include a significant relaxation of restrictions, an expectation that the government has tried to dispel in the days since then.

It does seem, however, that traffic has increased in recent days and that more people have been taking to parks and other open spaces to enjoy the sunshine this weekend, possibly in anticipation of significant changes being made to the lockdown.

Johnson insisted in his address that the the lockdown had "prevented this country from being engulfed by what could have been a catastrophe," although 31,855 people in the UK have now lost their lives due to coronavirus, the second highest death toll in the world behind the United States, and the biggest in Europe.

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

55 comments

Avatar
Sriracha replied to Rich_cb | 3 years ago
2 likes
Rich_cb wrote:

The virus is transmitted via close proximity to other people and through contaminated objects.

People and objects are both quite visible to most so remaining alert seems perfectly valid.

Unless you're a politician irresponsibly trying to score points.

Proximity is not a means of transmission. It increases the probability of droplets of saliva from an infected person reaching the mucous membranes of another, which does transmit the infective agent.

If proximity was the actual means of transmission then distance would be the only safeguard. However distance is only a way to reduce the probability of droplets spanning the gap.

Another way would be for the infected person to wear a cloth facemask capable of catching droplets of saliva from their mouth as they speak. Of course, if we assume that those who are not self isolating do not know that they are infected then everybody must wear a mask in public. Not a medical grade mask for personal protection, just a simple cloth mask for the protection of others.

Avatar
Rich_cb replied to Sriracha | 3 years ago
1 like

So proximity is not a means of infection it just increases the likelihood of infection...

That statement remains true with a cloth mask.

I feel you're being a bit pointlessly pedantic.

My point was that being alert to potential sources of infection and acting accordingly will reduce your risk of infection.

Avatar
Sriracha replied to Rich_cb | 3 years ago
1 like

Not at all pedantic. The whole game is to reduce the probability of transmission. I realise you were speaking in shorthand. However the message that "proximity" is the means of transmission has pretty much taken root, through reverse engineering the "social distance" message. Hence all the hue and cry leading to vigilante closure of public rights of way narrower than 2m, etc.

Distance is but one means to interrupt the physical transfer of droplets. If we are to return to any semblance of normality we need an alternative to social distancing. The conversation needs to spring from the means of transmission, rather than just remain anchored on distance, if we are to move forward. I don't think that is pedantic.

Avatar
eburtthebike | 3 years ago
7 likes

Since all the cycle haters won't be able to criticise us for riding as much and as far as we like now, what other reason will they find to have a go at us?

Of course; what with traffic back to normal, we'll be in their way again.

There goes the "Golden Age" of cycling.

Avatar
Rich_cb replied to eburtthebike | 3 years ago
1 like

They'll still be able to criticise those of us in Wales.

Count yourself lucky that the English legislation is much more cyclist friendly.

Avatar
eburtthebike replied to Rich_cb | 3 years ago
3 likes

Rich_cb wrote:

They'll still be able to criticise those of us in Wales. Count yourself lucky that the English legislation is much more cyclist friendly.

Not sure I'd define encouraging all those drivers back on the road as "cyclist friendly."

Avatar
Rich_cb replied to eburtthebike | 3 years ago
2 likes

It's more friendly than banning cyclists from going anywhere further than a few miles from their house.

It's not often I'll say this but I'd much prefer to be in England right now.

The Welsh government are making the UK government look coherent.

Avatar
Simon E replied to Rich_cb | 3 years ago
2 likes

Rich_cb wrote:

It's more friendly than banning cyclists from going anywhere further than a few miles from their house. It's not often I'll say this but I'd much prefer to be in England right now. The Welsh government are making the UK government look coherent.

Be careful what you wish for!

And I don't think that one piece of guidance (it's not legislation, remember) regarding the distance you can cycle can really be compared to the daily stream of utter bollocks that spews forth from any London government minister you care to name. The Welsh and Scottish governments have not changed their position and therefore not caused anything like the same confusion. I'd move back in a heartbeat if I could. Maybe one day...

Avatar
Rich_cb replied to Simon E | 3 years ago
0 likes

The legislation was also more restrictive.

Limited to once a day at its worst.

As of Wednesday our ability to cycle will remain severely curtailed whereas in England there will be no restrictions at all.

The WAG have offered no scientific evidence to justify this.

The WAG also failed to record COVID deaths in one health board for over a month and another for several weeks.

They also failed to achieve their pathetic testing target of 5000 a day so just abandoned it.

Avatar
johnnym replied to eburtthebike | 3 years ago
4 likes

Eloquent Sunday motorist called me a "penis" yesterday for not using the "cycle path" (aka the nettle and pothole strewn stretch of broken tarmac that'd destroy your full suspension mountain bike).  Made me feel quite nostalgic.

Avatar
Organon replied to eburtthebike | 3 years ago
8 likes

eburtthebike wrote:

There goes the "Golden Age" of cycling.

The Golden Age was last Thursday between 6 and 7pm. I hope you enjoyed it.

Avatar
kil0ran replied to Organon | 3 years ago
5 likes

It was shit this morning. Three close passes in a mile, loads of traffic. In contrast last week I rode the same section (around 3 miles in total) without a single vehicle passing me, let alone close passing me. It's all back to normal round here already, hum of the traffic on the bypass in the distance, much more traffic down our side street.

People have heard "crack on, use your cars lads to get to work", and none of the nuance in the govt's message. We're basically back to "herd immunity will save us"

Avatar
eburtthebike replied to kil0ran | 3 years ago
2 likes

kil0ran wrote:

We're basically back to "herd immunity will save us"

Some of us.  Predictions are 100,000 could die.

Avatar
kil0ran replied to eburtthebike | 3 years ago
4 likes

Indeed - and to be clear I'm not in favour of that approach. Already lost one family member very suddenly to this virus. Govt have completely cocked this up.

Contact tracing app: wrong platform, dead in the water

PPE: yeah, sorry guys

Care homes: well, they wouldn't have been around to vote in the next election anyway

Half-arsed lockdown with more holes in it than a lump of ementhal cheese

I'm fortunate our whole family can stay home and that's what we'll be doing because the death rate is only going one way after yesterday's announcements.

Avatar
Canyon48 | 3 years ago
1 like

And we're allowed to drive places to exercise now...

Avatar
kil0ran replied to Canyon48 | 3 years ago
1 like

Rack's already back on the car smiley

Avatar
grumpyoldcyclist replied to Canyon48 | 3 years ago
4 likes

Not to Wales or Scotland please, different rules apply. I'm sure that Boris made that clear though, oh..........

Avatar
Rich_cb replied to grumpyoldcyclist | 3 years ago
0 likes

Public health in Wales and Scotland is no more his remit than public health in France or Spain.

Devolved matters are entirely the responsibility of the devolved governments.

Johnson isn't responsible for setting those policies or communicating them to the public.

Avatar
alchemilla | 3 years ago
4 likes

Roads will be back to the old normal as from tomorrow, as everyone jumps in their car to get back to work . Oh well, the peace and quiet was nice while it lasted.

Avatar
kil0ran replied to alchemilla | 3 years ago
3 likes

There's at least one cockwomble speeding around our neighbourhood at the moment squealing tyres and beeping their horn like we've won the World Cup or something.

It's so windy for the next couple of days I think I'll revert to gravel mud riding

Avatar
Municipal Waste replied to alchemilla | 3 years ago
2 likes

Seemed to be back to normal here in Hove already... But with a lot more speeding!

Avatar
HarrogateSpa replied to alchemilla | 3 years ago
7 likes

Go to work 'if possible by car'. Damage done.

How many people will hear the afterthought about cycling & walking? Probably not many.

Avatar
Judge dreadful | 3 years ago
0 likes

Happy days. I can get my mileage back up to it's normal level. 

Avatar
kil0ran replied to Judge dreadful | 3 years ago
6 likes

Bike or car? wink

Avatar
Judge dreadful replied to kil0ran | 3 years ago
1 like

laughBike mainly. There was no limit before, but it wasn't adviseable to go on very long rides, in case it went belly up outside of easy unassisted recovery's distance. Now there's 'officially' no limit, it's not so much of an issue.

Pages

Latest Comments