At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
This is a news article, not a review. Ok, so some other outlets have done a review already - but this isn't purporting to be one.
Yeah, I agree. Of course we don't have to store bikes on private property, but if we want them still to be there in the morning it's probably...
I suspect that may have been deliberate. I'm pretty sure no-one would suspect Tom_77 of being a snail either....
They have a point - the lack of investment in mental health services is a problem.
How can that be imposed, when road cycling is on open roads?
Engagement is definitely key. ...
Thats if you believe that a slightly bigger bearing surface translates in any meaningful way to "pedaling stiffness" which to my mind is the...
Everyone carrying more / brighter searchlights will fix things? Perhaps it helps sometimes, but I think this leads to other issues. We're already...
Lake's naming and sizing: never knowingly comprehensible. Good shoes, baffling range.
Not enough, evidently.