At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
I don't know if they would specifically target them but I do know that travelling on local services around London a couple of times a week, once or...
Terrible sales technique....
Layman here - is it naive to expect that the person writing the app might be given the product itself to work with?!
This is the ridiculous bit. I am allowed to cycle alongside these people on the road where the speed limit is higher. When we get inside, everyone...
Just had a very satisfying micro illustration of this. Turned into a long straight 20mph road behind a car which proceeded to vanish into the...
My previous business (a software company) was repeatedly targeted by thieves breaking in and stealing projector, monitors etc. (this was early...
I presume they're not idiots and know perfectly well the difference. They just choose to pretend the two are the same.
Didn't happen.
I thought MvDP win yesterday was brilliant. Not to detract from the moron who threw this bottle but MvDPs reaction at the time was so on brand for...
F. UCI , F. Warners