Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Back to REVIEWS
review
Inner tubes
Kenda Ultra Lite inner tubeKenda Ultra Lite tube

Kenda Ultra Lite inner tube

7
by Shaun Audane
UPDATED Thu, Oct 15, 2015 04:24

First Published Apr 28, 2009

0
£6.99

VERDICT:

7
10
Great tube for the weight conscious, shame about limited sizes
Weight: 
69g
Contact: 
www.todayscyclist.co.uk
How we test

At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works. Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.

What the road.cc scores mean

Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.

  • Exceptional
  • Excellent
  • Very Good
  • Good
  • Quite good
  • Average
  • Not so good
  • Poor
  • Bad
  • Appalling

This review contains links to retailers. Purchases made after clicking on those links may help support road.cc by earning us a commission but all of our reviews are fully independent.

Weighing a mere 69g each, Kenda’s Ultralight tubes would be my choice over Latex variants if I was trying to shave every last gram from my bike. So if you’re a nimble, lightweight racer, these could be a good investment but the heavier and more puncture prone amongst us should look elsewhere.

Wall thickness is a mere 0.6mm so greater care is needed to avoid pinching the tube, and be sure to file any rough valve holes to prevent chafing this area. Ours had a threadless presta extension so as not to cause any hassles when paired with deep section aero rims.

Pressure retention is a vast improvement over Latex but while never completely flat the tyres needed topping up every three days or so. I managed to avoid puncturing over the test period, despite chasing through forest tracks with scant regard for thorns and brambles. If you do hole them their supple construction should mean successful repair with a decent patch kit.

Given that the rotating mass of the wheels is the best place to save weight, these tubes could be the easiest and least expensive way for lighter or more careful riders to improve performance on a race or TT mount but the limited sizing limits them to road or XC mountain bike duties which is a shame given it rules out crossers, Moultons and recumbents which could also benefit.

Verdict

Excellent choice for weight conscious road or XC riders.

road.cc test report

Make and model: Kenda Ultra Lite inner tube

Size tested: 26x1.5-1.75

Tell us what the product is for, and who it's aimed at. What do the manufacturers say about it? How does that compare to your own feelings about it?

As the name suggests, the Ultralites are minimalist tubes intended as the least expensive means of weight reduction for road and XC MTB riders. I would generally agree, although they wouldn't be my first choice were I a heavier rider.

Tell us some more about the technical aspects of the product?

69 Gram Butyl construction. 0.6mm wall thickness makes for a very, very thin tube.

Rate the product for quality of construction:
 
7/10

No punctures throughout the test period and held their pressure better than Latex.

Rate the product for performance:
 
7/10
Rate the product for durability:
 
7/10

Varies - if you're prone to punctures and were determined to have minimalist tubes then Latex might be a better choice.

Rate the product for weight, if applicable:
 
9/10
Rate the product for value:
 
7/10

A very good performance upgrade for the money but only really viable with a light wheelset.

Tell us how the product performed overall when used for its designed purpose

No problems, required slightly more frequent inflation but improves rolling resistance with lightweight tyres.

Tell us what you particularly liked about the product

Low weight and pleasing, round profile.

Tell us what you particularly disliked about the product

Threadless valve

Did you enjoy using the product? Yes

Would you consider buying the product? Yes

Would you recommend the product to a friend? As part of a bike's calorie controlled diet yes.

Overall rating: 7/10

About the tester

Age: 35  Height: 1m 81  Weight: 70 kilos

I usually ride: Rough Stuff Tourer Based around 4130 Univega mtb Frameset  My best bike is: 1955 Holdsworth Road Path and several others including cross & traditional road

I've been riding for: Over 20 years  I ride: Most days  I would class myself as: Experienced

I regularly do the following types of riding: cyclo cross, commuting, touring, fixed/singlespeed, mtb,

Ultralite
Kenda
inner tube
Shaun Audane

Shaun Audane is a freelance writer/product tester with over twenty-eight years riding experience, the last twelve (120,000 miles) spent putting bikes and kit through their paces for a variety of publications. Previous generations of his family worked at manufacturing's sharp end, thus Shaun can weld, has a sound understanding of frame building practice and a preference for steel or titanium framesets.
Citing Richard Ballantine and an Au pair as his earliest cycling influences, he is presently writing a cycling book with particular focus upon women, families and disabled audiences (Having been a registered care manager and coached children at Herne Hill Velodrome in earlier careers)

Latest Comments