Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

TECH NEWS

Video: Backtracker uses radar technology to warn of approaching vehicles

New gadget seeking funding could provide radar-powered warning of approaching vehicles from behind + video

New gadget Backtracker, currently seeking the necessary funding to be put into production, provides early warning of vehicles approaching from behind using radar technology and alerts their distance and speed on a handlebar-mounted device.

Backtracker is claimed to be able to detect approaching vehicles up to 140m away. A handlebar-mounted unit indicates the speed and distance of an approaching vehicle, via an array of LED lights, while the rear-mounted unit, incorporating the radar technology, lights up to alert approaching vehicles.

The inventors describe the Backtracker as a “sixth sense” and, should it work as well as claimed, could provide a safe alternative to other measures for keeping an eye on other road users behind you, such as bar end mirrors or simply looking over your shoulder.

In a study carried out for the DfT by the Transport Research Laboratory in to cycling casualties a few years back, although getting hit from behind wasn't the most common type of collision involving cyclists and motor vehicles (getting hit from the side was) it was the type most likely to kill you.

Backtracker has been developed by a team of engineers based in Stellenbosch, South Africa, who set out in 2010 to develop a product that could make cycling safer. The idea came about after meeting a cyclist fearful of vehicles approaching from behind: “The idea for Backtracker was born through a chance meeting with an elderly cyclist, who had resorted to riding in the face of oncoming traffic, for fear of motorists behind him. It inspired us to create a safety product that could bring confidence back into every ride.

"As cyclists, we know the joy of taking to the open road. We also know the dangers, and rear approaching vehicles represent the worst kind. We don’t always hear them approaching, and motorists are often blissfully unaware of cyclists. In 2010 we set the task of solving this challenge in the hope of gaining some peace of mind while enjoying the fresh air."

The Backtracker has a maximum vehicle detection range of 140m and maximum vehicle speed of 100mph. The battery lasts a claimed 8-hours and the rear LED has a peak output of 40 lumens. The two units together weigh just 130g and use Bluetooth Low Energy to communicate with each other.

You can currently pre-order the Backtracker at crowdfunding website Dragon Innovation from $149. They’ve currently raised $9,707 of their $226,000 goal. More info at www.backtracker.io

David worked on the road.cc tech team from 2012-2020. Previously he was editor of Bikemagic.com and before that staff writer at RCUK. He's a seasoned cyclist of all disciplines, from road to mountain biking, touring to cyclo-cross, he only wishes he had time to ride them all. He's mildly competitive, though he'll never admit it, and is a frequent road racer but is too lazy to do really well. He currently resides in the Cotswolds, and you can now find him over on his own YouTube channel David Arthur - Just Ride Bikes

Add new comment

58 comments

Avatar
don simon fbpe | 9 years ago
0 likes

pikeamus, as I said earlier "fucksticks" will be "fucksticks".

Avatar
pikeamus replied to don simon fbpe | 9 years ago
0 likes
don simon wrote:

pikeamus, as I said earlier "fucksticks" will be "fucksticks".

Well yes.

I'm just saying that I think people who believe cyclists that wear headphones are being inherently irresponsible are wrong.

Avatar
don simon fbpe | 9 years ago
0 likes

Road and cycle paths.
I generally shout STRAAAAAAAAAAAAAVAAAAAAAAAAAA! as this is the most effective way of passing.
I'm more than comfortable in my passing technique, I say at volume that I'm passing on the right/left, whichever I deem safer and am more than capable of avoiding any form of contact if there is a misunderstanding. 1,000s of kms and zero collisions would support this. HTH.

Quote:

By way of contrast to your example, I've had several instances where a cyclist switched from undertaking a line of traffic to overtaking it, swerving into my path as they did so because they were relying on their hearing and didn't realise a cyclist was already overtaking the traffic.

And as the following cyclist, what did you do to avoid a collision?

Avatar
pikeamus replied to don simon fbpe | 9 years ago
0 likes
don simon wrote:

And as the following cyclist, what did you do to avoid a collision?

Braked sharply and gave them a few choice words, though I would dispute the phrase "following cyclist" in this context. On one instance, where I was far enough back, I yelled a warning and it made no difference. On a busy road during rush hour most people assume that yells they hear aren't directed at them. Because they typically aren't. When people yell at my I typically assume it's some sort of abuse and ignore it. Because it typically is.

Anyway, we're getting off track. My point is that, as a responsible rider, my hearing virtually never causes me to change what I'm doing.

Avatar
don simon fbpe | 9 years ago
0 likes
Quote:

It's just easy to be a fukstick w/o earphones

And I still fail to see how this revolutionary aid is going to be of any help to either set of "fucksticks".
"Fucksticks" will be "fucksticks".

Avatar
don simon fbpe | 9 years ago
0 likes
Quote:

I don't wear headphones, but I really can't understand why people think it's so dangerous to do so.

Because I've come to overtake cyclists and runnerists who might be meandering a bit while absorbed in their music. Shouted a warning, which is generally ignored. I then pass said cyclist or runnerist only to see that it was the headphones that made them completely unaware of what is happening around them. Of course I understannd that it is fully my responsibility to pass these meanderers safely and they have to do nothing. #LawOfTheJungle.
Why deliberately handicap yourself? It's not like it's absolutely necessary, is it?

Avatar
sfichele replied to don simon fbpe | 9 years ago
0 likes

I've also passed cyclists who *werent* wearing headphones, but were chatting, and then decided to turn right without looking over their shoulders because they couldnt hear a car. It's just easy to be a fukstick w/o earphones

Avatar
pikeamus replied to don simon fbpe | 9 years ago
0 likes
don simon wrote:

Because I've come to overtake cyclists and runnerists who might be meandering a bit while absorbed in their music. Shouted a warning, which is generally ignored. I then pass said cyclist or runnerist only to see that it was the headphones that made them completely unaware of what is happening around them. Of course I understannd that it is fully my responsibility to pass these meanderers safely and they have to do nothing. #LawOfTheJungle.
Why deliberately handicap yourself? It's not like it's absolutely necessary, is it?

Sounds like you are talking about passing on a cycle path, which is not usually the context of the discussion. The context is usually more on the lines of Boris Johnson's comments on a ban in London. On a road you should be passing with the same distance that we expect from a motor vehicle anyway, so a little meandering shouldn't make any difference.

Out of interest, what do you shout? I've seen cyclists and runners be confused by the typical "on your right", and move that way themselves thinking that's what they're being asked to do. I kind've think that mixing sport cyclists and summer-weekend-picnicking riders on the same cycle path is almost as awkward as mixing commuter cyclists on the same roads as traffic.

By way of contrast to your example, I've had several instances where a cyclist switched from undertaking a line of traffic to overtaking it, swerving into my path as they did so because they were relying on their hearing and didn't realise a cyclist was already overtaking the traffic.

Avatar
Manchestercyclist | 9 years ago
0 likes

What we need is a device that the police can use to detect the speed of vehicles and then they could prosecute. If only this sort of thing existed...

Avatar
Fifth Gear | 9 years ago
0 likes

What cyclists need is a device which measures and records the speed of passing cars and the distance from the cyclist. Once we have evidence which is good enough for the courts the police would no longer be able to avoid prosecuting drivers for dangerous tailgating and overtaking.

Avatar
sfichele | 9 years ago
0 likes

The device imo opinion is useless in it's current form.
It could be massively improved by incorporating a safety-distance calculator.

http://geckocycling.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/wip-distance-calculator.html

Given the distance you can approximately calculate what speed a car should be doing if it's to slow down in time in the event it cant overtake.

That could be used to change the colour of the user screen. Green for car is slowing down (given the distance) or Red, the car is above the threshold.

Without such a calculator the device is somewhat useless because it leaves entirely to the rider to determine if speed X and distance Y is of concern.

All of this still doesnt fix the problem of the many, many, many false-positives, where there was room to overtake, which is actually what makes the device fairly redundant

Avatar
samuri | 9 years ago
0 likes

Or have it logon to Twitter and say 'Bye'

Avatar
Bez | 9 years ago
0 likes

Perhaps there is an eventual application for this technology, though.

If the device could detect a speed above 30mph at a distance of less than 3m, and at that point it could trigger your phone to rapidly display all the photos stored on it, it would save you having to bother to have to flash your own life in front of your eyes before you die.

Avatar
Bez | 9 years ago
0 likes

So, anyway, the point is this.

When a cyclist is killed by being hit from behind, the radar will show that a car is approaching from behind, perhaps quite quickly.

When a cyclist is passed by a car, the radar will show that a car is approaching from behind, perhaps quite quickly.

99.999999999999999% of cases will be the latter.

If it's not possible to identify the former (*and* to do so in time to react in such a way as to avoid the collision), the device seems useless.

Avatar
bikebot | 9 years ago
0 likes

If they replace the handlebar units LEDs with the motion tracker sound effect from Aliens, I'll buy it*

*not really.

Avatar
Airzound | 9 years ago
0 likes

I hope no one has spent money on this as it is a crock of shit idea. Don't give up the day job.

If it had missile lock it would be worth considering, but otherwise nah ……. it's rubbish!

Avatar
znarf replied to Airzound | 9 years ago
0 likes

Dude you have no clue - this is an amazing device! I've used it, and in all honesty I wouldn't want to cycle without it.

Its an amazing feeling to know what's going on behind you while cycling - very liberating!

Avatar
Steveal | 9 years ago
0 likes

Whilst flawed, I do like it that people can come up with a concept like this and within hours get a whole raft of "feedback" from a huge and impassioned focus group. The hope is something may just come out of it which may just be of some use. Exactly what, I'm not sure. How about making it aero so it can tell you when you are about to be caught and dropped by your -2 minute man/woman in your club tt?  35

Avatar
auldain | 9 years ago
0 likes

When will someone develop and market a lightweight and indescrete front and rear facing video camera wit a lot battery life an a loop in record in system. Either for fitting to th bike or incorporated into helmets or front and rear lights units. Surely no that complicated or difficult. Make the compulsory and make sure all car van and lorries and make sure they know bikes are carrying them and I predict drivers would instantly become more considerate.

Avatar
Joeinpoole replied to auldain | 9 years ago
0 likes
auldain wrote:

When will someone develop and market a lightweight and indescrete front and rear facing video camera wit a lot battery life an a loop in record in system. Either for fitting to th bike or incorporated into helmets or front and rear lights units. Surely no that complicated or difficult. Make the compulsory and make sure all car van and lorries and make sure they know bikes are carrying them and I predict drivers would instantly become more considerate.

I was thinking the same. A rear-facing camera with a handlebar-mounted display would be far more useful ... if there is any use at all for such a device.

Avatar
bikebot replied to auldain | 9 years ago
0 likes
auldain wrote:

When will someone develop and market a lightweight and indescrete front and rear facing video camera wit a lot battery life an a loop in record in system. Either for fitting to th bike or incorporated into helmets or front and rear lights units. Surely no that complicated or difficult. Make the compulsory and make sure all car van and lorries and make sure they know bikes are carrying them and I predict drivers would instantly become more considerate.

I keep thinking the same thing, there's an absolute demand for someone to make a half decent quality, discrete bike camera with good battery life to use for safety and evidence if you're unlucky enough to need it.

Given how many people I see with a GoPro on their head, which is both expensive and about as discrete as a head mounted penguin, there's an absolute gap in the market. The mobius camera is the closest I've found in terms of the electronics and price, but it needs three things.
- A small rainproof case as standard, not something to go diving with that makes it huge.
- Double the battery life.
- Better mounts, either copy the GoPro system or something even smaller.

All the pieces to make such a camera are out there, the car dashcam market is overflowing with cheap hardware, someone just needs to produce something for the cyclists.

Avatar
harrybav | 9 years ago
0 likes

A safe alternative to a mirror? To make cycling safer? Come on, road.cc. Mirrors are safe and surely you can find a better way to write about driver danger.

Avatar
themartincox | 9 years ago
0 likes

The light at the back I can see being useful, the bit at the front I can see being terrifying - constantly going off!

just use as a posh rear light and leave it at that surely?

Avatar
A V Lowe | 9 years ago
0 likes

Get any decent flow of passing vehicles and you'll switch the damn thing off - certainly not much use on any busy roads, and in town. forget it.

Avatar
mrmo | 9 years ago
0 likes

if you ride on the average road with a stream of traffic, how would you determine if the beep is one to worry about or just another car???

Avatar
severs1966 | 9 years ago
0 likes

Unless you are riding in a segregated bicycle path, there will be cars up your arse practically all the time, and there is nothing you can do about it.

You might as well have a sticker on the handlebars with printed text on it stating "there is traffic behind you. It includes several car drivers who want you to just go away somehow".
That would be correct more than 90% of the time.

If you have a radar device such as this and it tells you there is a vehicle behind you, it affords you no advantage over looking over your shoulder, or just paying no heed whatsoever to whatever is behind you. What are you supposed to do when it tells you that there is traffic behind you? Accelerate away from it? Pull in to the gutter and let it squeeze past you with the usual 6mm of space?

Avatar
stevengoodfellow | 9 years ago
0 likes

So what is the reaction supposed to be to the warning? You'll look behind before making a manouvre (or use a mirror) and then act accordingly, but what do you do when a car is identified speeding behind you? It will need to be used in conjunction with a Teleporter, beam me up Scotty.

Avatar
andrew.couling | 9 years ago
0 likes

Think I'm with what seems to be the majority.

I don't really get it!

Avatar
earth | 9 years ago
0 likes

On the one hand its a bit like the NASA space pen - ie just use a mirror.

On the other hand I would replace the LED head unit with an app for a phone or just an audio alarm. I already have enough on my bars and there would not be enough room for another gadget.

Avatar
mrchrispy | 9 years ago
0 likes

How about a kickstarter for a subtle automatic top tube mounted gravel chip launcher. Anything that passes too close and fast gets a stone fired at then (maybe about window height)....the usual suspects would soon start giving bikes more room.

Pages

Latest Comments