Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Cyclist dies after riding into chain on way back from watching Tour of Britain

Victim was returning home to Caernarfon from watching Tour of Britain - councils urged to remove such hazards

A cyclist in North Wales has died after being thrown from his bike in Caernafon on Monday evening when he rode into a chain strung between two bollards. Rhodri Hughes-Jones, aged 69, had been returning home with friends after watching the Tour of Britain in Llandudno.

A transport expert and cycling campaigner says the council had been warned of the danger posed to cyclists by the bollards, and has urged Sustrans to carry out an audit of such hazards.

Bollards with chains strung between them are often used by local authorities and private landlords alike to spearate motor vehicles from pedestrians, but the latter can often find them a hazard and trip over them, especially if distracted and the chain is at low level.

The potential consequences for a cyclist travelling even at moderate speed are - as thei case would appear to prove l- ikely to be more serious.

The incident took place at around 7pm as the victim rode home with other members of the cycling club he belonged to, including trained first aider Dylan Bee, who desperately tried to save his friend’s life.

Mr Bee recounted the evening to the Daily Post, which has video of the location where the crash happened – the chain has now been threaded through traffic bollards to warn people of its presence.

He said: “Myself, Rhodri and four other members of Clwb Beicio Menai were returning from Llandudno. We’d had a great day and a good ride.

“We came into Caernarfon and had gone over the red bridge in Victoria Dock and he hit the chain between two bollards. He’s gone over the bollards and banged his head.

“I jumped off my bike and he’d landed in a sort of recovery position. I rang 999.

“There was blood coming from a cut in his head. He was unconscious and totally unresponsive. His fingers had turned blue. It sounded like his heart had stopped. I tried to talk to him and pinched his fingers.”

He went on: “I gave him cardiopulmonary resuscitation before the ambulance arrived. They were with him for 15-20 minutes and the paramedic said: ‘We’ve got a pulse.’ Rhodri was taken to hospital.

“I jumped into the car to go and explain to his wife what had happened. It was 11pm when I left Ysbyty Gwynedd. I felt better that he had a pulse. The police later told me Rhodri had injured his back and was being moved to Stoke.”

Yesterday, news reached him that his friend had lost his life, to Mr Bee’s shock. “Until I had a call to say that he had died this lunchtime, I thought he was better,” he said.

“I saw the chain. It’s difficult to know if Rhodri had,” he concluded.

A spokesperson for the Welsh Ambulance Service said: “We had a call at 7.03pm on Monday to reports a cyclist had taken ill on Church Street in Caernarfon.

“A man in his 60s in a critical condition was taken to Ysbyty Gwynedd.”

Police are not treating the fatality as suspicious but have asked witnesses to contact them on 101.

Transport expert Dave Holladay, who among other things acts as an advisor to CTC, said on Twitter that the council had failed to recognise the hazard that the chain being placed between the bollards placed to cyclists, and that warnings about this and other badly placed bollards had been ignored.

He added: “This is not first serious crash because of #bollards & #chains officially placed to create #hazards for cycling,” and added, “As a #matterofurgency I'd suggest @sustrans carries out an audit on #bollards to identify & address this hazard.”

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

10 comments

Avatar
Loz _ A | 9 years ago
0 likes

I'm just back from Caernarfon where I'm a regular visitor. This is brought home to me as it turns out to be the brother in law of a friend there. It also brings it home as I travel that route very, very regularly when there, and have cycled through those (chain-less) bollards many times - it could have been me.
History is littered with these incidences of thoughtless council (or whoever) actions, yet they never learn. This is the approved route through Caernarfon between the two halves of the Lon Eifion cycle path. One section of which, past the castle, has just been completely revamped. There is no no excuse for whoever approved the chain across. According to another cyclist friend that was only a couple of weeks ago. He himself only just saw it in time! They are very difficult to see in half light.
Even if one of the cyclist did avoid it, we all know what it's like to be at the back of the pack and not having the reaction time after the guy in front bobs round an object or pothole in the road - you hit it!
There must be a case of corporate manslaughter to be investigated here.

Avatar
levermonkey | 9 years ago
0 likes

The chain should be removed and if there is a need for an barrier then the bollards should be replaced with gate-posts and a gate fitted preferable one painted red and white and fitted with reflectors. The cheepo solution of a galvanized chain that merges with the background strung between two bollards is totally unacceptable in this day and age.

How and why did officials from the local council not flag this up to the landowners is beyond me. There is no valid reason why this type of barrier exists.

Avatar
Myriadgreen | 9 years ago
0 likes

Really terrible news. But... was this on Sustrans land? Why should Sustrans do an safety audit? If it's council land then it's their responsibility.

Avatar
Bhachgen | 9 years ago
0 likes

If Gwynedd council had already been warned of the danger posed by this chain, they are going to find it pretty hard to defend themselves against the compensation claim that is surely coming their way.

Avatar
jacknorell | 9 years ago
0 likes

Those chains are pretty invisible at night, even when walking. Need to be removed.

Avatar
mattsccm | 9 years ago
0 likes

Oh come on!
I agree its a sad thing to happen but you can't seriously suggest that every piece of chain should have a sign on it?
I assume that there would have to be a sign between every upright and of a size that could be seen by ALL. Lets say a metre square? Shall we have sign posts on kerbs as well? I clipped one yesterday whilst looking behind and drinking and chatting at the same moment. Idiot.
As the article says, his mate saw it.
It was a error of judgment in my opinion. Of course my memory of those chains is dated, it being at least 6 months since I walked there. I assume that the poster above has been there more recently.

Avatar
drfabulous0 replied to mattsccm | 9 years ago
0 likes
mattsccm wrote:

Oh come on!
I agree its a sad thing to happen but you can't seriously suggest that every piece of chain should have a sign on it?

Absolutely not, I would suggest they be removed entirely.

Avatar
workhard replied to mattsccm | 9 years ago
0 likes
mattsccm wrote:

Oh come on!
I agree its a sad thing to happen but you can't seriously suggest that every piece of chain should have a sign on it?

Why not?

I'd rather they weren't used at all, and I guarantee if another sort of barrier were used it would be highly visible.

Avatar
oozaveared replied to mattsccm | 9 years ago
0 likes
mattsccm wrote:

Oh come on!
I agree its a sad thing to happen but you can't seriously suggest that every piece of chain should have a sign on it?
I assume that there would have to be a sign between every upright and of a size that could be seen by ALL. Lets say a metre square? Shall we have sign posts on kerbs as well? I clipped one yesterday whilst looking behind and drinking and chatting at the same moment. Idiot.
As the article says, his mate saw it.
It was a error of judgment in my opinion. Of course my memory of those chains is dated, it being at least 6 months since I walked there. I assume that the poster above has been there more recently.

If it were in a workplace it would not be allowed sign or no sign. It's a trip hazard. Putting things in public areas that will trip people over and dismount people from bikes that are not properly visible is irresponsible. Why should council employees be allowed to do it whilst at the same time the council employs people to make sure that private business and individuals comply with health and safety legislation?

How come they should be exempt? They should be the ones setting an example of best practice.

Avatar
workhard | 9 years ago
0 likes

Tragic waste of a life in an entirely avoidable accident.

Why any public official would think stringing a plain chain, with no signage attached to it, between two bollards could be an appropriate piece of infrastructure in a public place is beyond me.

But I fear the attitude will be "it's only a dead cyclist so why the fuss?" and nothing much, apart from the usual bout of victim blaming, will happen.

Latest Comments