Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

25 TRILLION dollars! What the world could save by going two-wheeled by 2050

More people on bikes would save trillions on car parks and motorways, says UCI-backed report

Getting more people cycling for transport instead of driving could save the world up to $25 trillion in infrastructure costs by 2050, a report has found.

The amount of money that could be saved, nearly twice the USA’s GDP, was estimated by the UCI, who joined the European Cyclists’ Federation and the Bicycle Product Suppliers Association in commissioning the project, written by the University of California, Davis and the Institute for Transportation and Development Policy.

Successfully promoting cycling could also save up to 10% of global urban transport emissions of carbon dioxide.

"Cycling is a crucial means of transport for millions of people around the world,” said UCI President Brian Cookson.

“We are delighted to have co-funded this report which demonstrates that, if more governments followed good examples like the Netherlands and Denmark to make their cities better for cycling, we’d see huge increases in the quality of life in those cities, lower carbon emissions and reduced costs of transport.”

The study analysed almost 1000 cities around the world to establish, for the first time, existing levels of cycling around the world. The authors found that on average 6% of all travel was made by bike, ranging from around 1% in North America and Australia to around 25% in many cities in the Netherlands, China and Japan.

By 2030, given stronger policy measures, cycling could reach 11% of global travel demand, and 14% by 2050, saving billions of tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions in the process.

A ‘High Shift to Cycling’ scenario was developed by the authors, based on cities in each region reaching levels of cycling comparable to that already achieved in many cities. In the USA, for instance, this would mean around 9% of trips being made by bike by 2030, of which almost half would come from an increase in electric bike usage alone.

The effect of a ‘High Shift to Cycling’ scenario would be to cut carbon dioxide emissions worldwide from urban transport by 46% by 2050, with cycling alone contributing 10% - over a fifth of the total savings on carbon dioxide emissions.

The remainder comes from changes to engine efficiency and a shift to public transport.

Savings of around $25 trillion could be achieved through obviating the need for new major highways, parking facilities and the maintenance of existing infrastructure to accommodate forecast growth in road traffic.

Electric bikes already form a very significant part of the market in countries with high cycle use, such as the Netherlands, Germany and China. They are often used to make longer trips, thereby competing with the car or public transport options.

As part of the report the authors set out the following recommendations to achieve a global shift to cycling:

  •     Rapidly develop cycling and e-bike infrastructure on a large scale;
  •     Implement bike share schemes in large and medium-size cities, prioritising connections to transit;
  •     Revise laws and enforcement practices to better protect people cycling and walking;
  •     Invest in walking facilities and public transport to create a menu of non-motorised transport options that can be combined to accommodate a wide variety of trips;
  •     Coordinate metropolitan transport and land-use plans, so that all new investments result in more cycling, walking, and public transit trips and fewer trips by motorized vehicles;
  •     Repeal policies that subsidize additional motor vehicle use, such as minimum parking requirements, free on-street parking, and fuel subsidies;
  •     Encourage cycling and active transport via pricing policies and information campaigns;
  •     Adopt policies such as congestion pricing, other fees to charge a price for driving that accounts for negative externalities; and
  •     Dedicate fuel taxes, driving fees and other transport-system revenues towards investment in sustainable transport.

 

Add new comment

2 comments

Avatar
Kim | 8 years ago
1 like

Correction to the Twitter comment advertising this story, it is not the UK that is cutting spending, only England, in Scotland spending has been increasing in resent year, largely due to the efforts of Pedal on Parliment . Whether this slow increase in spending (currently ~1.8% of transport spend) will continue beyond the Holyrood elections in May remains to be seen. Either way PoP will continue to call for a minimum of 5% of the transport budget (rising by 1% per year until it gets to 10%). City of Edinburgh Council started with this policy in 2013 and now 8% of the total transport budget of the city is spent on cycling and modal share is rising.

Avatar
captain_slog | 8 years ago
1 like

That is a substantial amount. But I think it should be written TREEEELLION for maximum impact.

Latest Comments