Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Health effects of cycling outweigh pollution risks - unless you're a courier

New study models for the first time the effect of varying levels of air pollution on health - but warn risks of poor air could outweigh cycling's health benefits for bike couriers...

A new study has found the health effects of cycling outweigh the negative effects of air pollution even in cities with very poor air quality, such as London and Delhi – but its authors warn bike messengers could be the exception due to their level of exposure.

For the first time scientists at the University of Cambridge and the University of East Angliahave modelled the risks and benefits of walking and cycling in varying levels of air pollution around the world, using computer simulations from epidemiological studies and meta-analyses data. 

While previous studies have shown the benefits of exercise in polluted environments this research suggests in only the worst 1% of polluted cities the ill effects of poor air quality outweigh the benefits of exercise. However, for bike messengers the health benefits of cycling may be cancelled out by exposure to air pollution because they spend long periods in areas of poor air quality, while the health benefits of active travel in polluted areas are less marked in fitter individuals.

Health effects of exercise outweigh negatives of air pollution, study finds

Dr Marko Tainio, from the MRC Epidemiology Unit at the University of Cambridge, who led the study, says: “Our model indicates that in London health benefits of active travel always outweigh the risk from pollution. Even in Delhi, one of the most polluted cities in the world – with pollution levels ten times those in London – people would need to cycle over five hours per week before the pollution risks outweigh the health benefits.

He said: “A small minority of workers in the most polluted cities, such as bike messengers, may be exposed to levels of air pollution high enough to cancel out the health benefits of physical activity.”

The study was led by researchers from the Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR), a partnership between the Universities of Cambridge and East Anglia.

Senior author Dr James Woodcock, also from CEDAR, says the results make the argument for investment in infrastructure to encourage cycling and walking.

“Whilst this research demonstrates the benefits of physical activity in spite of air quality, it is not an argument for inaction in combatting pollution. It provides further support for investment in infrastructure to get people out of their cars and onto their feet or their bikes – which can itself reduce pollution levels at the same time as supporting physical activity.”

The authors say their model doesn’t take into account detailed information on short-term air pollution spikes, or on conditions within different localities in cities, or on individuals’ physical activity and disease history. They add for fitter individuals the benefits of active travel will be smaller than those who are less active outside their commute.

To find out more about the study, and the University of East Anglia's research, click here.   

Add new comment

4 comments

Avatar
moonfish | 7 years ago
0 likes

Yeh but even as a courier who spends like 6 - 7 on the road a day, I still feel like I'm dying from air pollution!  And in the summer, a face mask is not the greatest comfort but it does the job!

Avatar
dafydd_llywelyn | 7 years ago
1 like

This is a bad news article isn't it... if you do more than 5 hours of cycling a week in a city area you're lungs are getting buggered. I do more than that just by commuting, I often wonder whether at the end of a few commuting whether I'm thirsty or if its fumes and pollution.

 

Also the start of the artice "cities like London and Delhi."

Avatar
FluffyKittenofT... | 7 years ago
2 likes

I don't think this is good news at all. I found it rather annoying. Its depressing the question even has to be asked.

I'm physically active because I have to be, because its how I get around. So all the study is telling me is that the pollution I'm enduring along the way is significantly damaging my health. Trading off 'exercise' against 'pollution' seems a bogus thing to do, in that it assumes 'exercise' is some sort of optional luxury.

And what's with "people would have to cycle 5 hours a week"? As if that's a lot of cycling! That's just a normal commute, surely? Fortunate I don't live in Delhi, I guess.

There's also, I suppose, a distinction to be drawn between pollution in developing countries caused mostly by industry (which is a trade-off between health and wealth to be decided by people in those countries) and that in the West caused by other people making unnecessary car journeys.

Avatar
cyclisto | 7 years ago
1 like

Glad to hear this. Unfortunately poor air quality is a great factor to postpone many daily commutes. Serious legislative action regarding mainly car use and central heating systems must be taken for the common good.

Latest Comments