Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Back to news
news
Commuting
Transport
Video: "Insanity" - cyclists protest British Rail bike ban 37 years ago todayCyclists protest British Rail ban in 1980 (BBC archive footage still).PNG

Video: "Insanity" - cyclists protest British Rail bike ban 37 years ago today

Riders use bikes to block entrance to rail operator's head office...
by Simon_MacMichael
Mon, Jan 02, 2017 21:33
19

The BBC has posted archive footage to Twitter from 37 years ago today of cyclists using their bicycles to block the entrance to British Rail’s head office in protest at bikes being banned from rush-hour trains.

In the footage from 2 January 1980, one of the cyclists says: “We believe that it’s absolute insanity to have this ban imposed now at a time of energy shortage when in fact commuting with your bicycle on the train is the most efficient way to go to work.”

The BBC reporter points out that British Rail were “a trifle embarrassed” at the demonstration, given that two years earlier they had encouraged people to take bicycles on trains by allowing them to be carried free of charge.

Nowadays, of course, it’s the norm for non-folding bicycles to be banned at busy times – and even when it’s quieter, advance reservations for them are required by franchise holders such as Great Western Railway.

Meanwhile, the mass cycle parking put in place at stations such as Cambridge by Abellio Greater Anglia reflects the Dutch-owned company’s desire to shift commuting cyclists who use the train towards the Netherlands model of not taking a bike on the train at all.

For those heading to London at least, that’s easier now due to the Santander Cycles scheme which means they can leave their own bike at the station, take the train, then complete their journey on a hire bike.

Railways
British Rail
Network Rail
bikes on trains
Simon MacMichael

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

19 comments

Avatar
ktache | 7 years ago
1 like

You seem to come up with a great deal of politics before telling the rest of us not to.

And I didn't say that china was great, just that you didn't seem to pick the communist state that did use a lot of bicycles.

Avatar
ktache | 7 years ago
0 likes

Zjtm231, China?  Before it started it's recent market economy?

Avatar
Zjtm231 replied to ktache | 7 years ago
2 likes
ktache wrote:

Zjtm231, China?  Before it started it's recent market economy?

 

Yes absolutely.

Circa 1961 when Mao's reforms had killed up to 55 million people and most people couldn’t even afford a bicycle, oh and the roads were all dirt anyway....

Like I said; stop looking at cycling in a left vs right political perspective otherwise all your thoughts about it will be bound up in the political kaleidoscope you gaze at the world through.

Avatar
CygnusX1 | 7 years ago
1 like

Incidentally, I thought the only place you saw one of those "reflective" bandolier/belt  numbers (like the guy in the photo is wearing) these days was in the HC illustrations, until I saw an old chap wearing one just before christmas (trouser leg tucked into sock too)  -- the nostalgia trip fair warmed my cockles.  

Avatar
davel | 7 years ago
2 likes

I'm not sure whether I'm protesting or protesting against your interpretation... yes

Avatar
CygnusX1 replied to davel | 7 years ago
3 likes
davel wrote:

I'm not sure whether I'm protesting or protesting against your interpretation... yes

Methinks thou dost protest too much 1

Avatar
Carlton Reid | 7 years ago
2 likes

Parking your bike at a railway station in the 1970s attracted a hefty fee, nearly equal to what it cost to park a car.

Sir George Young pointed out the lunacy of such a policy in a parliamentary debate and the fees were – eventually – dropped.

Avatar
Yorkshire wallet replied to Carlton Reid | 7 years ago
0 likes
Carlton Reid wrote:

Parking your bike at a railway station in the 1970s attracted a hefty fee, nearly equal to what it cost to park a car.

Lefties eh! 3

Avatar
JonD | 7 years ago
2 likes

Off-peak provision's pretty bloody patchy too. Had the dubious pleasure of getting the recumbent - and only a 2-wheeler - onto one of the higher speed things  with 3 bike bays/wheel 'supports' next to the loos a month or so back, going north from Guildford. Just as well there was only one other bike there, a 3rd (or mine) would have been in the corridor walkway, I'd guess less than welcome with a trolley service 7 Not to mention a bugger to get on/off around a corner into the space, just as well I'm able-bodied apart from a f***ed neck.

 

Oh, and Santander don't have hire recumbents, but I'm sure you knew that...

Avatar
Kim | 7 years ago
2 likes

Here in Scotland Abellio's desire to keep bike off trains is damaging the developing cycle tourism industry, maybe it is time to blockade Abellio's offices...

Avatar
The goat replied to Kim | 7 years ago
1 like
Kim wrote:

Here in Scotland Abellio's desire to keep bike off trains is damaging the developing cycle tourism industry, maybe it is time to blockade Abellio's offices...

 

Some irony here in that Abellio is the the renamed Dutch National Railway Company.   From what I've seen, the bike policy documents of the rail companies simply provides an excuse to not provide any service when bikes are involved.  Rolling stock funded by the taxpayer should include bike carrying capacity - huge gap not reognised by the Ministry for Transport.

 

Avatar
Awavey replied to The goat | 7 years ago
1 like
The goat wrote:
Kim wrote:

Here in Scotland Abellio's desire to keep bike off trains is damaging the developing cycle tourism industry, maybe it is time to blockade Abellio's offices...

 

Some irony here in that Abellio is the the renamed Dutch National Railway Company.   From what I've seen, the bike policy documents of the rail companies simply provides an excuse to not provide any service when bikes are involved.  Rolling stock funded by the taxpayer should include bike carrying capacity - huge gap not reognised by the Ministry for Transport.

 

 

road.cc should really go review the bike and go approach of Abellio to see if its fit for purpose, rather than rely on the glossy pictures of Cambridge or Chelmsford, theres alot of East Anglia fit for cycling around  that bike&go simply doesnt and wont cater for. its simply a scheme to keep bikes off trains because they take up space you can squeeze people in, how it gets lauded as a solution to cycling I dont know as Ive never seen a single bike&go bike being used.

dont forget Greater Anglia serves Harwich, which links via a ferry to Holland, and lots of european cyclists do often enjoy cycling touring to this country,so they get to Harwich and get told ah but you need to follow the dutch model of leaving your bike at home to use a train....

and Im not looking forward to the new generation of Abellio trains, as I suspect even less cycling storage will be provided.

Avatar
HarrogateSpa | 7 years ago
2 likes

Spelling mistakes in the link from the home page. Up-to-date news from the 1980s. Use of the Americanism, to protest something. Everything we have come to know and...know from road.cc 3

Avatar
davel replied to HarrogateSpa | 7 years ago
1 like
HarrogateSpa wrote:

Use of the Americanism, to protest something. 

I agree with the spirit of the post but must protest this point. Protest as a verb was used in Latin, which gave rise to its English, French, Italian and Spanish descendants (which also use protest as a verb). 

Avatar
CygnusX1 replied to davel | 7 years ago
2 likes
davel wrote:
HarrogateSpa wrote:

Use of the Americanism, to protest something. 

I agree with the spirit of the post but must protest this point. Protest as a verb was used in Latin, which gave rise to its English, French, Italian and Spanish descendants (which also use protest as a verb). 

I don't believe HarrogateSpa was protesting against the use of protest as a verb, but was protesting against the sentence structure:

US: protest BR bike ban

UK: protest against BR bike ban

Avatar
ConcordeCX | 7 years ago
7 likes

Terrorists. None of them are wearing helmets.

Of course Beeching had shown earlier that the best way to deal with the whole issue was not to exclude bicycles from the railways, but to exclude trains from them, and give the tracks to the bearded weirdoes, reserving town centre roads for decent people and their Ford Anglias.

Avatar
handlebarcam | 7 years ago
6 likes

This is a timely reminder of the last time we found ourselves at the start of a severe swing of political power to the far right (now redefined as centre ground.) Before the Public Order Act of 1986 and the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act of 1994 made such obstruction and unnotified protests illegal. And the results speak for themselves...

Quote:

Nowadays, of course, it’s the norm for non-folding bicycles to be banned at busy times – and even when it’s quieter, advance reservations for them are required by franchise holders such as Great Western Railway.

I wonder what we'll be looking back on having been banned in a few decades time? Anonymous commenting on the Internet perhaps? Riding bicycles, anywhere other than in designated heritage cycle parks, where they could slow down self-driving cars?

Avatar
Zjtm231 replied to handlebarcam | 7 years ago
2 likes
handlebarcam wrote:

This is a timely reminder of the last time we found ourselves at the start of a severe swing of political power to the far right (now redefined as centre ground.) Before the Public Order Act of 1986 and the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act of 1994 made such obstruction and unnotified protests illegal. And the results speak for themselves...

Quote:

Nowadays, of course, it’s the norm for non-folding bicycles to be banned at busy times – and even when it’s quieter, advance reservations for them are required by franchise holders such as Great Western Railway.

I wonder what we'll be looking back on having been banned in a few decades time? Anonymous commenting on the Internet perhaps? Riding bicycles, anywhere other than in designated heritage cycle parks, where they could slow down self-driving cars?

The far right? 

What on earth are you on about?

By this rationale Russia and the former USSR should be some cycling Utopia, guess what? They aren’t. 

In case you had not noticed The supposed "right wing" Mayor of London that just left the position had implemented the greatest period of construction of dedicated cycling infrastructure that London has ever seen.  In comparison the "left wing" newly installed mayor has done nothing but cancel the Westway cycle path construction.

The longer people like you continue to see the furthering of the cause of cycling and the provision of dedicated infrastructure as a purely a party political matter the longer it will take to increase the consensus that is it needed.   You do us all a disservice. Open your eyes and your mind.

 

  

Avatar
ParkySouthLondon | 7 years ago
2 likes

They were ahead of their time with the beards too.

Latest Comments