According to Transport for London, the city's Quietways, the first of which opened last year and runs from Waterloo to Greenwich, "follow backstreet routes, through parks, along waterways or tree-lined streets," and thereby "overcome barriers to cycling, targeting cyclists who want to use quieter, low-traffic routes, providing an environment for those cyclists who want to travel at a more gentle pace."
The on-the-ground experience of riders can be rather different, however, as Mark Treasure of the Cycling Embassy of Great Britain sets out in this blog post from last year while parts were still under construction, and in this post by The Ranty Highwayman a couple of months later.
The programme has also been criticised by London's former cycling commissioner, Andrew Gilligan.
> Gilligan: Quietways programme is a failure
We've seen a couple of videos of near misses on the route - a month or two back, one did the rounds on social media of a black-cab driver turning across a rider - and here's another one sent in by road.cc reader Henry Dalton shows.
It's a classic SMIDSY - "Sorry mate, I didn't see you" scenario as the driver pulls into a parking bay on the left then immediately swings right to perform a u-turn without having spotted Henry, who is almost knocked from his bike as he carries straight on towards a path that is bollarded off to bar access to motor vehicles.
Quite why the driver didn't see Henry is unclear - but it's possible from this, and other videos we've seen from this and other places where there is a through route for people on bikes that drivers can't use that leads to an assumption that in effect they are in a cul-de-sac and simply aren't aware that someone could be pedalling through.
Over the years road.cc has reported on literally hundreds of close passes and near misses involving badly driven vehicles from every corner of the country – so many, in fact, that we’ve decided to turn the phenomenon into a regular feature on the site. One day hopefully we will run out of close passes and near misses to report on, but until that happy day arrives, Near Miss of the Day will keep rolling on.
If you’ve caught on camera a close encounter of the uncomfortable kind with another road user that you’d like to share with the wider cycling community please send it to us at info [at] road.cc or send us a message via the road.cc Facebook page.
If the video is on YouTube, please send us a link, if not we can add any footage you supply to our YouTube channel as an unlisted video (so it won't show up on searches).
Please also let us know whether you contacted the police and if so what their reaction was, as well as the reaction of the vehicle operator if it was a bus, lorry or van with company markings etc.
Add new comment
71 comments
Why didn't the cyclist slow down in anticipation of something going pearshaped?
If the rider had shouted "Oy!" 5 seconds before, it would have avoided the near-miss.
Five seconds before, the car was about 20-30 metres away and the windows were up. Seems unlikely that the driver would have heard them.
…with you on that; kind of obvious what was about to happen!
Watch it again up to a second before the driver does the dangerous manouevre, and tell me how it is obvious that the driver is going to do it? He doesn't indicate his intentions and there is nothing at all to show what he is going to do, so how is it obvious?
It does look like the driver has his hazzard lights on.....
Not sure he does. Difficult to be certain. There's certainly lights - brake lights though.
Of more concern is the amount of time I've spent on this thread discussing the ins-and-outs of a pig's arse - and to little effect. Some just don't want to listen to other opinions.
At least the weekend's nearly here so, off the forum, and I'm going out for a ride. Who's coming?
...too fucking right.
Extremely unlikely that those were hazard lights they were brake lights. Even if they were hazard lights, how does that show that they were about to do a u-turn? Last time I checked hazard warning lights were for warning about hazards when stationary, not for indicating an illegal manouvre.
The driver was pulling into a parking space and it is therefore a reasonable assumption that they were going to park, and impossible to guess that the driver was going to pull out without looking. Why didn't the driver look before carrying out his manouevre, as required in law?
Thats easy: they didn't slow down because they didn't imagine that someone would be so f-ing stupid as to make that manoeuvre without checking that the road was clear.
Pages