Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Updated: Cyclists injured in Westminster terror attack as driver crashes through them

Two hospitalised with non-life threatening injuries this morning; streets around Parliament cordoned off

UPDATED: Two people, believed to be cyclists, were taken to hospital with non-life threatening injuries after a car was driven into a group of riders outside the Palace of Westminster this morning. The Metropolitan Police have confirmed that they are treating the incident as a terrorist attack.

The incident happened at 0737 according to Scotland Yard, who cordoned off a large area of Westminster.

The driver of the vehicle, who has been arrested on suspicion of having committed terror offences, ploughed through a group of around 10 cyclists on the south-east corner of Parliament Square before hitting a crash barrier outside the Palace of Westminster.

Three cyclists were injured. Two, a man and a woman, were treated at hospital for their injuries but have since been released, while a third was treated at the scene.

Another cyclist was shown on video chasing after the car on foot just before it hit the barrier outside Parliament.

Armed police officers were on the scene immediately and took the driver away in handcuffs.

Cycle Superhighway 3, the most popular cycle route in London, runs through Parliament Square though the cyclists who were hit were not on that route but on the other side of the square..

Eyewitnesses told BBC News that they believed the motorist drove into the cyclists on purpose.

Barry Williams, who works for the BBC at its Millbank location, said: "I heard lots of screams and turned round.

"The car went onto the wrong side of the road to where cyclists were waiting at lights and ploughed into them.

"Then it swerved back across the road and accelerated as fast as possible and hit the barrier at full pelt.

"It was a small silver car and he hit it at such speed the car actually lifted off the ground and bounced.

"Then the police just jumped. Two officers managed to leap over the security barriers and then the armed police vehicles all sped towards the scene."

BBC reporter Callum May, speaking from Westminster, said: "Parliament Square is now ringed by blue police tape. There is a large group of armed officers in the square.

"Paramedics are treating a small group of people sitting on the ground outside the Palace of Westminster.

"They are wrapped in silver blankets. One eyewitness, who declined to give his name, said he saw a small hatchback drive into a group of cyclists and then into the barrier outside the Palace of Westminster.

“The man said that the driver's action appeared deliberate."

Scotland Yard confirmed that a man was arrested and is being held at a police station in south London.

Mayor of London Sadiq Khan has 

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

35 comments

Avatar
vonhelmet | 5 years ago
2 likes

People are uncomfortable with the idea of terrorism actually happening. They don’t like the idea of people being so angry and confused that they drive cars into people, or the idea that the system can’t always stop things like that. Why do you think conspiracy theories persist about the authorities sanctioning 9/11? People don’t want to believe that anyone could hate them enough to do something like that, or that the system would allow something like that to happen.

It doesn’t look like an accident, though it does look like he didn’t do his recon properly and ended up crashing way before he reached any more dramatic target than a massive roadblock.

Avatar
brooksby | 5 years ago
1 like

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/aug/15/police-question-man-on-suspicion-of-terrorism-over-westminster-crash

Quote:

On Wednesday morning, two plainclothes police officers were at the Bunna internet cafe on Stratford Road in Sparkhill. ...

Michael Hagos, 35, was drinking coffee outside the Bunna cafe. He said he often saw Khater {the alleged perpetrator} there though he didn’t really know him. "I think it was an accident," he said. "People around here think it was an accident."

So, after all that coverage of it, some random bloke still tells a news reporter that "it was an accident"?  What do you have to do for random blokes to believe something like this was intentional?

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to brooksby | 5 years ago
3 likes

brooksby wrote:

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/aug/15/police-question-man-on-suspicion-of-terrorism-over-westminster-crash

Quote:

On Wednesday morning, two plainclothes police officers were at the Bunna internet cafe on Stratford Road in Sparkhill. ...

Michael Hagos, 35, was drinking coffee outside the Bunna cafe. He said he often saw Khater {the alleged perpetrator} there though he didn’t really know him. "I think it was an accident," he said. "People around here think it was an accident."

So, after all that coverage of it, some random bloke still tells a news reporter that "it was an accident"?  What do you have to do for random blokes to believe something like this was intentional?

That'd be why we want the police to just follow the law rather than using their opinions.

Avatar
brooksby replied to hawkinspeter | 5 years ago
1 like

hawkinspeter wrote:

brooksby wrote:

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/aug/15/police-question-man-on-suspicion-of-terrorism-over-westminster-crash

Quote:

On Wednesday morning, two plainclothes police officers were at the Bunna internet cafe on Stratford Road in Sparkhill. ...

Michael Hagos, 35, was drinking coffee outside the Bunna cafe. He said he often saw Khater {the alleged perpetrator} there though he didn’t really know him. "I think it was an accident," he said. "People around here think it was an accident."

So, after all that coverage of it, some random bloke still tells a news reporter that "it was an accident"?  What do you have to do for random blokes to believe something like this was intentional?

That'd be why we want the police to just follow the law rather than using their opinions.

OK, I consider my wrist slapped there  I suppose IMO its just very unlikely to have been "an accident".  Whether or not it was "terrorism" as its commonly understood is still up in the air...

Avatar
FluffyKittenofT... replied to hawkinspeter | 5 years ago
0 likes

hawkinspeter wrote:

brooksby wrote:

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/aug/15/police-question-man-on-suspicion-of-terrorism-over-westminster-crash

Quote:

On Wednesday morning, two plainclothes police officers were at the Bunna internet cafe on Stratford Road in Sparkhill. ...

Michael Hagos, 35, was drinking coffee outside the Bunna cafe. He said he often saw Khater {the alleged perpetrator} there though he didn’t really know him. "I think it was an accident," he said. "People around here think it was an accident."

So, after all that coverage of it, some random bloke still tells a news reporter that "it was an accident"?  What do you have to do for random blokes to believe something like this was intentional?

That'd be why we want the police to just follow the law rather than using their opinions.

 

Though ultimately that usually involves a jury, made up of, um, 'random blokes' (plus random women).

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to FluffyKittenofTindalos | 5 years ago
0 likes

FluffyKittenofTindalos wrote:

hawkinspeter wrote:

brooksby wrote:

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/aug/15/police-question-man-on-suspicion-of-terrorism-over-westminster-crash

Quote:

On Wednesday morning, two plainclothes police officers were at the Bunna internet cafe on Stratford Road in Sparkhill. ...

Michael Hagos, 35, was drinking coffee outside the Bunna cafe. He said he often saw Khater {the alleged perpetrator} there though he didn’t really know him. "I think it was an accident," he said. "People around here think it was an accident."

So, after all that coverage of it, some random bloke still tells a news reporter that "it was an accident"?  What do you have to do for random blokes to believe something like this was intentional?

That'd be why we want the police to just follow the law rather than using their opinions.

 

Though ultimately that usually involves a jury, made up of, um, 'random blokes' (plus random women).

Yes, but in theory you have a somewhat impartial judge guiding them according to the written law.

Avatar
Jamminatrix | 5 years ago
0 likes

Reading these comments has done nothing other than convince me it's time for the UK to lay in the grave it dug for itself.  The irony is you all view your martyrism as noble cause, whereas outsiders just see simpletons.

Avatar
Mungecrundle replied to Jamminatrix | 5 years ago
8 likes
Jamminatrix wrote:

Reading these comments has done nothing other than convince me it's time for the UK to lay in the grave it dug for itself.  The irony is you all view your martyrism as noble cause, whereas outsiders just see simpletons.

Being more of an oaf than a simpleton, I'm afraid you are going to have to expand on your comment, because I have no idea what you are alluding to.

Avatar
davel replied to Jamminatrix | 5 years ago
4 likes

Jamminatrix wrote:

The irony is you all view your martyrism as noble cause, whereas outsiders just see simpletons.

This is random word bingo. No?

Testing Google translate? No? 

Deliberately stretching a definition of 'irony' that would make Alanis Morissette wet herself through embarrassment?

Avatar
ktache | 5 years ago
5 likes

From what I heard the motorist ploughed into the group of cyclists who were stopped at a red light, but there I was thinking that we all ignored red lights.

I wish the injured well and a speedy recovery.

 

 

Avatar
CygnusX1 | 5 years ago
5 likes

New CCTV image of the driver has emerged:

 

Avatar
brooksby | 5 years ago
9 likes

I wonder if there's an argument here for restricting ownership of private motor vehicles...? If they are increasingly being used actively and solely as weapons?

Avatar
HoarseMann replied to brooksby | 5 years ago
4 likes

brooksby wrote:

I wonder if there's an argument here for restricting ownership of private motor vehicles...? If they are increasingly being used actively and solely as weapons?

I think you're onto something here. Perhaps we need to stop citing the environmental and health benefits of cycling when putting forward the case for cycling infrastructure...

and just focus solely on the improved security that would result from restricting motor vehicles in our cities and installing protected cycling infrastructure. 

Avatar
FluffyKittenofT... replied to brooksby | 5 years ago
6 likes

brooksby wrote:

I wonder if there's an argument here for restricting ownership of private motor vehicles...? If they are increasingly being used actively and solely as weapons?

 

For all the concern about 'dangerous cycling' I've yet to hear of an attacker attempting to spread terror by cycling into a crowd of pedestrians.

 

They should probably bar motorised vehicles from the area around parliament.  The area within the north and south circulars should probably be sufficient.

Avatar
CygnusX1 replied to FluffyKittenofTindalos | 5 years ago
1 like

FluffyKittenofTindalos wrote:

brooksby wrote:

I wonder if there's an argument here for restricting ownership of private motor vehicles...? If they are increasingly being used actively and solely as weapons?

For all the concern about 'dangerous cycling' I've yet to hear of an attacker attempting to spread terror by cycling into a crowd of pedestrians.

They should probably bar motorised vehicles from the area around parliament.  The area within the north and south circulars should probably be sufficient.

That quality rag, the Evening Standard,  ran with an editorial this evening suggesting just that - although not quite as wide a net as Fluffy Kitten suggests, and didn't qualify it as motor vehicles.

Avatar
Yorkshire wallet | 5 years ago
0 likes

Going by the colour chart I'd say the only people that could be classified as 'shooters' are gingers and albinos.

I guess I'll have to wait for the suntan to fade a bit as well as I an currently close to 'radical'.

Avatar
efail replied to Yorkshire wallet | 5 years ago
1 like

Yorkshire wallet wrote:

Going by the colour chart I'd say the only people that could be classified as 'shooters' are gingers and albinos.

I guess I'll have to wait for the suntan to fade a bit as well as I an currently close to 'radical'.

I'm 'radical' from the shorts line to my ankles, biceps to my wrists and the back of my neck and ears. (factor 50 on the face)

Avatar
hawkinspeter | 5 years ago
2 likes

They are now treating this as a terrorist incident, so the driver must be darker skinned (certainly not gammon coloured).

Vince Cable has captured the motorists' zeitgeist: "Thank goodness the barriers are in place and worked."

Avatar
srchar replied to hawkinspeter | 5 years ago
1 like

hawkinspeter wrote:

They are now treating this as a terrorist incident, so the driver must be darker skinned (certainly not gammon coloured).

So great that there are people around who challenge prejudices based on people's skin co... oh no wait.

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to srchar | 5 years ago
1 like

srchar wrote:

hawkinspeter wrote:

They are now treating this as a terrorist incident, so the driver must be darker skinned (certainly not gammon coloured).

So great that there are people around who challenge prejudices based on people's skin co... oh no wait.

You got me!

Here's the best image I could find of the terrorist (the blurry bloke 2nd from the left):

 

Avatar
brooksby replied to hawkinspeter | 5 years ago
6 likes

hawkinspeter wrote:

srchar wrote:

hawkinspeter wrote:

They are now treating this as a terrorist incident, so the driver must be darker skinned (certainly not gammon coloured).

So great that there are people around who challenge prejudices based on people's skin co... oh no wait.

You got me!

Here's the best image I could find of the terrorist (the blurry bloke 2nd from the left):

 

Ah, I see.  Its nothing to do with skin colour or race, just old-fashioned pixellism!  Personally, I think the pixellated should stand up for themselves, and campaign for equal rights  yes

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to brooksby | 5 years ago
6 likes

brooksby wrote:

hawkinspeter wrote:

srchar wrote:

hawkinspeter wrote:

They are now treating this as a terrorist incident, so the driver must be darker skinned (certainly not gammon coloured).

So great that there are people around who challenge prejudices based on people's skin co... oh no wait.

You got me!

Here's the best image I could find of the terrorist (the blurry bloke 2nd from the left):

 

Ah, I see.  Its nothing to do with skin colour or race, just old-fashioned pixellism!  Personally, I think the pixellated should stand up for themselves, and campaign for equal rights  yes

I think we need a consultation about harsher laws for Minecraft.

Avatar
davel replied to brooksby | 5 years ago
6 likes

brooksby wrote:

hawkinspeter wrote:

srchar wrote:

hawkinspeter wrote:

They are now treating this as a terrorist incident, so the driver must be darker skinned (certainly not gammon coloured).

So great that there are people around who challenge prejudices based on people's skin co... oh no wait.

You got me!

Here's the best image I could find of the terrorist (the blurry bloke 2nd from the left):

 

Ah, I see.  Its nothing to do with skin colour or race, just old-fashioned pixellism!  Personally, I think the pixellated should stand up for themselves, and campaign for equal rights  yes

The police have NOT denied that the following suspect was spotted fleeing the scene, muttering something about 'Doris Donson'

 

Avatar
brooksby replied to davel | 5 years ago
2 likes

davel wrote:

brooksby wrote:

hawkinspeter wrote:

srchar wrote:

hawkinspeter wrote:

They are now treating this as a terrorist incident, so the driver must be darker skinned (certainly not gammon coloured).

So great that there are people around who challenge prejudices based on people's skin co... oh no wait.

You got me!

Here's the best image I could find of the terrorist (the blurry bloke 2nd from the left):

 

Ah, I see.  Its nothing to do with skin colour or race, just old-fashioned pixellism!  Personally, I think the pixellated should stand up for themselves, and campaign for equal rights  yes

The police have NOT denied that the following suspect was spotted fleeing the scene, muttering something about 'Doris Donson'

 

And it is just coincidence that there's a Wreck-It Ralph sequel coming out shortly? "Coincidence" - I think not!

Avatar
brooksby replied to brooksby | 5 years ago
0 likes

brooksby wrote:

davel wrote:

brooksby wrote:

hawkinspeter wrote:

srchar wrote:

hawkinspeter wrote:

They are now treating this as a terrorist incident, so the driver must be darker skinned (certainly not gammon coloured).

So great that there are people around who challenge prejudices based on people's skin co... oh no wait.

You got me!

Here's the best image I could find of the terrorist (the blurry bloke 2nd from the left):

 

Ah, I see.  Its nothing to do with skin colour or race, just old-fashioned pixellism!  Personally, I think the pixellated should stand up for themselves, and campaign for equal rights  yes

The police have NOT denied that the following suspect was spotted fleeing the scene, muttering something about 'Doris Donson'

 

And it is just coincidence that there's a Wreck-It Ralph sequel coming out shortly? "Coincidence" - I think not!

It occurs to me that the comments on here may have drifted ever so slightly off topic...  2   Sorry, people!

Avatar
Hirsute | 5 years ago
5 likes

I expect they were provoked by lawless cyclists riding 10 abreast.
And they don't pay road tax.

Avatar
HoarseMann | 5 years ago
6 likes

It says it all when most of the reporting on this focuses on the barrier being hit whilst giving one line at the end of the article to mention a group of cyclists being intentionally mown down.

There are few MPs at Westminster now anyway, they're all on holiday.

Avatar
Richard D | 5 years ago
15 likes

At the moment the police (and media) response is treating the incident as possibly terrorist-related.  As soon as they realise that it was just a homicidal cyclist-hater, they'll release the arrested suspect and collectively shrug their shoulders.  "People in cars kill cyclists.  What do you want us to do about it?  Just go about your business, not thing to see here ..."

Avatar
brooksby replied to Richard D | 5 years ago
10 likes

Richard D wrote:

At the moment the police (and media) response is treating the incident as possibly terrorist-related.  As soon as they realise that it was just a homicidal cyclist-hater, they'll release the arrested suspect and collectively shrug their shoulders.  "People in cars kill cyclists.  What do you want us to do about it?  Just go about your business, not thing to see here ..."

The sad thing is, you think you're being satirical.  Unfortunately, you're just being accurate.

Avatar
srchar | 5 years ago
14 likes

My sources in MI6 tell me that the driver is the Conservatives' social media manager on their way to work, momentarily distracted while using their mobile phone at the wheel to tweet about the impending crackdown on dangerous cycling.

Pages

Latest Comments