Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.
Add new comment
10 comments
Why? There's no suggestion of drug taking here, it's three whereabouts infringements. Moreover, it's normal in this type of case for the penalty to be backdated to the date of the third infringement, as has happened here. One of the central issues of concern is why it took nearly a year for the FFC to hold the disciplinary hearing. I can't imagine it's helped Baugé's preparations for 2012 having this hanging over his head for the best part of a year.
Got to say this is a big step backwards for French cycling. A country that has actually done a lot over last few years to clean up cycling. This is no more than a way to ensure he can compete at the Olympics without having to miss any actual racing. Probably the most disgusting thing to happen in French cycling since virenque was allowed to keep his K.O.M. jerseys clearly won with added va-va-voom.
If he was British, would the BOA ban him from the Olympics too?
I doubt it, given the precedent that was set with Christine Ohuruogu.
One year ban for Whereabouts infractions, upheld by CAS.
She appealed the subsequent BOA lifetime ban to independent arbitration panel in UK, won the appeal.
She didn't follow through her threat to run for Nigeria, got selected for GB for Beijing, and won gold.
Our understanding is that it would have been backdated to coincide with the third missed test, although there doesn't appear to be anything on the FFC site that would confirm its decision in November (and would hopefully give more details and dates of the infractions in question).
Hmm, so the ban is backdated, so he retains ability to compete at the Olympics, and has had the whole of his ban as a normal racing program building to the Olympics. Apart from losing his titles won during that period, how is that a ban? He's not stopped competing, is available for the Olympics, and prepared off a full 4 year build up - isn't that just "been stripped of his 2011 titles"?
Funnily enough his lawyer is muttering darkly about it all being a conspiracy by the UCI to upset his client's preparations given the Games are in London and his main rival is British
Why back date it? Is it just so that Bauge can compete at the Olympics? Seems like an odd one...
I guess so that the punishment relates to time the offense was committed so that any possibly performance-enhanced wins are forfeited.
ooops: double post