Unfortunately, this year’s Tour Féminin des Pyrénées won’t be remembered for a scintillating battle on the fearsome Hautacam, or for Marta Cavalli’s long-awaited return to winning ways after a difficult year.
Instead, the three-day stage race will be remembered for the UCI’s decision to call off the final stage following protests from a peloton concerned for its safety after two stages dominated by members of the public driving on the course (and even towards the riders), parked cars littering the final kilometres of stage one into Lourdes, race motorbike riders creating hazardous conditions, spectators wandering on the roads, a lack of marshals, and, finally, successful calls to neutralise most of the second stage to the foot of the Hautacam.
> "What a mess": Chaos as live traffic passes metres from racing peloton
“Considering the safety risks involved, we firmly believe that a bike race is not worth endangering the lives of the female cyclists,” Adam Hansen, the head of the riders’ union the CPA, said in a statement announcing that yesterday’s third and final stage had been cancelled.
> Tour Féminin des Pyrénées stopped amidst rider safety issues
So, how did the organiser of the Tour des Pyrénées react to being at the centre of a media frenzy (the race’s cancellation even made the BBC’s website!) concerning the running of his event?
By creating another, entirely different kind of media frenzy.
“What is happening is that the girls have requirements that are not in line with their level,” race director Pascal Baudron told La Nouvelle République yesterday morning.
“They imagine that they are on the Tour de France and that all the roads must be closed. But in France you cannot do that.”
Baudron continued: “They are sawing off the branch of which they are sitting. The day when there will be no more races, they will cry and that’s what’s going to happen.
“Quite honestly, I tell myself that it is not worth organising a race to see all those months of effort ruined for the whims of spoiled children.”
Unsurprisingly, Baudron’s questionable use of language, and his belief that top-tier pro cyclists are “spoiled children” for believing that they should be able to race without motorists driving at them, hasn’t gone down too well with most of the cycling community.
Some described the organiser’s comments as “sexist”, “offensive”, and “from the 15th century”, with Twitter user Jonathan writing: “The numerous use of ‘girls’ and ‘spoiled brats’ is quite telling of his attitude towards women”.
“Female riders being called spoiled for, er, not wanting to be hit by cars?” wrote cycling journalist Matilda Price. “Extremely basic levels of safety shouldn’t be the reserve of the Tour.”
“Sounds like it’s the race organisers with ‘requirements above their level,” added Ryan. “They expect the best cyclists in the world to show up to their race but they're not competent enough to fill out the forms to close the roads?”
Organising a major bike race is tough (as we’ve seen in Britain over the past year or so), but that’s certainly one way of ensuring you lose all the sympathy you had from onlookers, I suppose…
Add new comment
102 comments
The paying for the roads argument is disingenuous as neither cars nor bikes create much damage. It's the heavy lorries and buses that cause by far the most damage, so it would make sense to focus on them first if we want to charge road users for the damage caused.
I was sitting on a wall about 20 or so metres from the road and every time a lorry went past I could feel the whole ground shake. They must be causing masses of damage to the roads.
There's more road damage when they brake or accelerate rather than just rundling along. That's why the road is usually a lot worse by traffic lights and bus stops.
As also illustrated by all that weirdness you get on road surfaces at bus stops, where the road surface is all distorted, humped and wavy.
There are studies showing that road damage relates to the 4th (!) power of vehicle axle loading. Merely doubling axle load causes 16 times as much damage to the road. In practice this means that that bikes cause no damage at all to roads. But we knew that.
Is this why everyone gets upset when kids do wheelies in the street?
"MILLENNIUM".
"FALCON"
So what FairFuelUK are saying, is we need a war on the motorists (particularly illegal electric MOTORbike riders). I can get behind that.
You could almost start to think that FairFuelUK is funded by oil companies. Down with these electric vehicles that can be fuelled through wind and solar energy...
Is it? That would be interesting to know.
I know for a long time they got funding from the likes of the Road Haulage Association, but recently RHA have distanced themselves from FFUK and no longer contribute financially.
This is all I can find on their website:
"Previous backers have included Logistics UK, the RHA, the RAC, Association of Pallet Networks, UKLPG and others"
Now then Granville....
I went to London at the weekend and saw a lot of people using illegal ebikes (though they're not classified as ebikes at that stage of course).
I think anyone who is regularly exposed to that would believe that ebike users are running riot.
You dont need to go to London. Any town served by deliveroo or justeat will do. You can get an illegal "ebike" delivered straight to your door.
Nothing really to do with cyclists in general of course. More on a par with scooter riders not wearing helmets or not passing the relevant test or not having indicators.
Yes - and we should tackle this in part with their employers. Oh, no-one is employed by those companies, they're all just "contractors"? Nothing to see here then...
Part of me is happy when I hear "cyclists taking over" - even though I know it's hyperbole.
I have some sympathy for complaints because: a) CHANGE! For generations we've been taught "stay out of the way of cars" but now there are new, quieter vehicles in the space b) regulation and enforcement are playing catch-up with new devices and technology and c) we're still relegating all non-motorised modes to fight over space left-over after providing for maximum motor vehicle driving and parking.
Exactly. I see blokes all wrapped up (even in this weather) zipping around on what look like MTBs with the whole central space of the frame filled in with "something" all wrapped up with shiny grey duct tape. I'm presuming a selection of batteries and associated gizmos, since I've never seen any of them actually pedalling...
A lot of them seem to be working for food delivery places from what I've seen. Not so much different from using little mopeds, but probably cheaper to run what with the lack of insurance etc.
That's true and I spend quite a bit of time in Bristol, though I don't live there any more, and you do see some of that around Bristol, but in London I experienced a whole new level. There were loads of types of "ebikes" (but not ebikes) I hadn't seen before, such as vehicles that looked like Harley Davidsons, but with cranks that were tucked away where your legs couldn't realistically even get at to pedal.
In the medium-sized town where I currently live, I would say ebikes are a non-issue. In Bristol, I would say they're a bit of a pain, but in London I would say it's a problem.
Some eBike riders are taking the piss though.
This morning had one guy, normal clothes, passing by me at >45kph. Chased to get on his wheel. But couldn't - he was doing at least 47 kph uphill. Next lights, before Castleknock College (a school, though kids are out now, other than last few doing their exams) he just mounts the pavement to bypass the queue of cars and the red lights.
I'm sorry, but this guy is riding a motorcycle. And I for one would be quite happy to see the full weight of the law land on him for his lack of registration, insurance, tax and unroadworthy motor vehicle (non-conformant lights, NCT, etc.).
Had another guy slowly overtake me through the Phoenix park. Not quite as bad, only about 39 kph, but he's on one of these massive "eBikes" - very thick and heavy frame, forks like a light motor-bike, and tyres that were fatter than I had on my Kawasaki AR50 as a yoof (and I sought out racing tyres for it ). That thing must weighs _at least_ 25kg, and carries several times more kinetic energy than an 8 to 10kg road bike at the same speed. He's just lolling along at 39kph, with a thick jacket on on a warm morning, barely pedalling and not sweating.
These riders are also usually not very experienced cyclists. They're not used to riding on 2 wheels at that speed. They don't know what they're doing - to read the road ahead or handle their bikes.
This 2nd guy tried to take the next roundabout (last one in the park before Cunnyngham rd) and didn't have the confidence to properly turn the bike in to the radius and carry his speed through it, so ran wide and nearly ran into the kerb.
That's just this morning. Sorry, but these 40, 50+ kph unlawful motorcycle "eBikes" _are_ a problem.
The thing is, with no formal training whatsoever it is easy for us to spot these types of law breakers from half a mile away. it would take very little additional training for police officers to be able to identify illegal e-motorbikes, pull over and fine thier riders and crush the offending vehicles. It certainly wouldn't require license plates to make that possible.
Absolutely agree. However, as you and I both know, and as is evident from this TV debate, these illegal eBike-converted-to-motorcycles are giving fuel to the cyclist haters. And making it easier for them to call for more regulation (even though, I'd agree, all it needs is for existing regs to be enforced).
The last two news stories of Police identifying illegal electric bikes travelling at speed have ended with the death of three "little angels who wouldn't hurt a fly".
And whose parents admitted to having bought their "beautiful little boys" (TM) said illegal electric motorcycles for their 15th/16th birthdays...
They are not "e-bikes" and we shouldn't describe them as such - doing so lumps them together with legal e-bike riders and other cyclists, and adds fuel to Cox's fire. I agree with the rest of your post, though - there should be a clamp down on these illegal bikes and it would be very very easy for the police to do so if they wanted. In London, for example, a handful of plain clothed cyclists as spotters, and then police officers in cars ready to stop them. [Edit - I see Patrick has made a similar point before me.]
In theory. However in the recent tragic case where two boys died crashing their e-motorbike into an ambulance having earlier been followed by a police van, the police find themselves on the back foot for daring to have policed the streets. The suggestion, widely pushed by the BBC, seems to be that the police ought never to have been following the offenders.
Rather than serving as a cautionary tale about dangers of youngsters riding illegal e-motorbikes without a licence, helmet, insurance or registration the story is framed as an example of police malfeasance
Police here in Scotland are not allowed to chase motorcyclists due to the danger to both the riders and the general public, and have not been for some years.
At the heart of this are some irresponsible kids, parents, and trading standards teams that have been decimated by cuts since 2008. The idea that it's ok to sell an item that is used illegally about 99% of the time is also mad.
Absolutely - kids test boundaries and copy adult behaviour and take it further. Yes it's difficult as a parent because your child will increasingly take their cues from *other* adults and kids as they grow. But if we make these things available kids will get access to them.
If they don't get "feedback" that something is not OK to do they'll continue to do it. (Just like adults...)
Yeah, I did think that and wondered a bit about the right way to stop them, but I didn't have a ready answer and my post was long enough already.
They're certainly becoming a presence on the roads. Seems to be a new category of vehicle, a 40-50kph e-bike with rapid acceleration and no need to pedal. Yes they're supposed to fall under motorbike law but that doesn't seem to happen in practice and it's fair to say their riders do not share the concerns of visitors to this website re road manners, visibility etc. I too wince at their riding style.
Pages