Dublin City Council has come in for heavy criticism, from cyclists and non-cyclists alike, after rapidly moving to install a bike rack in an area which only two days previously had been the site of outdoor seating for a pub.
Siobhán Conmy, the owner of Street 66, a LGBTQ+ venue in Dublin city centre, says the bar’s rolling outdoor furniture licence – which has enabled it to have a popular seating area located on their loading bay – was rejected for the first time in years on Friday afternoon.
Then on Monday morning, a row of bike racks was installed in the loading bay, a swift turnaround described by Irish cycling website Sticky Bottle as the “fastest anyone has ever seen Dublin City Council moving”.
“Last Friday I was applying for the outdoor furniture license as normal, like we did over the last few years. I applied in October and then in March. I rang the Council every week to get an update. On Friday at 3pm I was told that we were refused for the loading bay,” Conmy told Extra.ie.
“Then [yesterday] morning one of my customers was passing by and told me Dublin City Council put bike racks on the loading bay. I hadn’t been notified, we haven’t been given the chance to appeal or been told why it’s been refused.”
Conmy also told the website that she believes she should be “given the chance to appeal”, especially considering the rapid-fire installation of the eight bike racks comes during Pride Month, the bar’s busiest period, and questioned the need for additional bike parking facilities on the street.
“The loading bay I assume would be reinstalled as a loading bay rather than a bike rack area. Which is dangerous outside a busy bar. The delivery drivers will be completely frustrated, our delivery day is tomorrow and they’ll have to drive up a footpath to do their job,” she said.
“Coming up to Pride Month, we have massive orders coming in. I don’t understand at all why it happened. It feels a little suspicious why a bike rack was installed on a Monday morning after a permit was refused on Friday evening.
“This one of our busiest months, we have tours coming from all over the world. There are nice vibes for the next couple of weeks.
“There are 26 bike racks on the street already, it seems very strange why they added an extra eight. I’d like an explanation why this was done outside our front door and why we weren’t given any form of notice or chance to appeal.”
An online petition calling for the bike racks to be removed has already been signed by almost 4,000 people, while ‘remove bike rack’ was trending on Irish Twitter.
One Labour councillor described the council’s decision as “really not good enough”, while iconic Irish drag queen and gay rights activist Panti Bliss tweeted that “None of this adds up. Dublin City Council isn’t being upfront here. Solidarity with Street 66.”
Notably, the move to install the bike racks has also been criticised by local cyclists, with the Dublin Cycling Campaign arguing that the loading bay was too narrow to facilitate bikes.
“We do not support the installation of the bike parking outside,” the group tweeted.
“Aside from the obvious issues with removing outdoor seating during Pride month, this is an example of very poor planning by Dublin City Council on a street that should be pedestrianised.
“These also look like a temporary installation which is confusing. The location also suggests it might be too narrow for bikes and they would stick out on the path or road.”
Add new comment
37 comments
I don't like adult cyclists riding on the pavement (unless there's a good safety/disability reason and it's done very carefully) and I don't do it myself, but it would be quite amusing to be challenged by Mr Cox for it, "Get off the pavement!" "I would, but I saw this bloke on telly telling me I don't contribute anything to the roads, so I don't feel I'm entitled."
Or maybe "I was worried about worsening the state of the roads and creating potholes"!
I don't pavement-cycle either BUT that doesn't help much. People on shared-use paths have become boilingly angry with me because I "shouldn't be cycling on the footpath". (No - bell, friendly hello or other passing method didn't seem to be the cause).
Given our councils have been cheap / box-ticking, creating "instant cycling infra" by sticking up blue/white signs on what otherwise look just like footpaths it's hard to blame them. Especially when (e.g. Auriol Grey case) even those councils appear uncertain of where cycling is allowed.
With some glee this morning, I filtered to the front of the queue at the 3 way temporary traffic lights currently creating havoc in town, using an albeit too narrow cycle lane*. At which point I gently dismounted onto the pavement and walked around the corner before getting back on the road and off on my merry way with virtually no delay to my journey.
*Actually narrower than a standard number plate in places, too keep it topical.
https://youtu.be/JmkKa_IpZT4
Ooh, an argument against bicycle number plates that might appeal to drivists: they might scratch their cars as we filter past.
No, it is our filtering that they want banned because they see it as us "jumping the queue "
It's funny how they think we should be part of the traffic "and wait our turn" if we're stuck behind them, but then get upset and think it's fine to close pass if they're stuck behind us.
Pages