Dublin City Council has come in for heavy criticism, from cyclists and non-cyclists alike, after rapidly moving to install a bike rack in an area which only two days previously had been the site of outdoor seating for a pub.
Siobhán Conmy, the owner of Street 66, a LGBTQ+ venue in Dublin city centre, says the bar’s rolling outdoor furniture licence – which has enabled it to have a popular seating area located on their loading bay – was rejected for the first time in years on Friday afternoon.
Then on Monday morning, a row of bike racks was installed in the loading bay, a swift turnaround described by Irish cycling website Sticky Bottle as the “fastest anyone has ever seen Dublin City Council moving”.
“Last Friday I was applying for the outdoor furniture license as normal, like we did over the last few years. I applied in October and then in March. I rang the Council every week to get an update. On Friday at 3pm I was told that we were refused for the loading bay,” Conmy told Extra.ie.
“Then [yesterday] morning one of my customers was passing by and told me Dublin City Council put bike racks on the loading bay. I hadn’t been notified, we haven’t been given the chance to appeal or been told why it’s been refused.”
Conmy also told the website that she believes she should be “given the chance to appeal”, especially considering the rapid-fire installation of the eight bike racks comes during Pride Month, the bar’s busiest period, and questioned the need for additional bike parking facilities on the street.
“The loading bay I assume would be reinstalled as a loading bay rather than a bike rack area. Which is dangerous outside a busy bar. The delivery drivers will be completely frustrated, our delivery day is tomorrow and they’ll have to drive up a footpath to do their job,” she said.
“Coming up to Pride Month, we have massive orders coming in. I don’t understand at all why it happened. It feels a little suspicious why a bike rack was installed on a Monday morning after a permit was refused on Friday evening.
“This one of our busiest months, we have tours coming from all over the world. There are nice vibes for the next couple of weeks.
“There are 26 bike racks on the street already, it seems very strange why they added an extra eight. I’d like an explanation why this was done outside our front door and why we weren’t given any form of notice or chance to appeal.”
An online petition calling for the bike racks to be removed has already been signed by almost 4,000 people, while ‘remove bike rack’ was trending on Irish Twitter.
One Labour councillor described the council’s decision as “really not good enough”, while iconic Irish drag queen and gay rights activist Panti Bliss tweeted that “None of this adds up. Dublin City Council isn’t being upfront here. Solidarity with Street 66.”
Notably, the move to install the bike racks has also been criticised by local cyclists, with the Dublin Cycling Campaign arguing that the loading bay was too narrow to facilitate bikes.
“We do not support the installation of the bike parking outside,” the group tweeted.
“Aside from the obvious issues with removing outdoor seating during Pride month, this is an example of very poor planning by Dublin City Council on a street that should be pedestrianised.
“These also look like a temporary installation which is confusing. The location also suggests it might be too narrow for bikes and they would stick out on the path or road.”
Add new comment
37 comments
Concerning the bike racks, outside the pub in Dublin...
" Just arrived one day took
two parking spaces for customers without notifying us first ,they do not have to tell anybody we were told.has affected business for us."
Yes, but you'll find that they replaced them with 10 parking spaces for customers...
Andy Cox hasn't thrown his hat in the ring until he's gone on TV with these people and put forward his argument.
Until then, he's no different from us
Two things, maybe he doesn't want to waste his time and give them legitimacy
Maybe he needs authorisation to appear on tv.
He is though wasting his time and giving them legitimacy... but to a much more restricted audience.
It's hardly the dramatic impact when its a few thousand who are likely to be his supporters anyway.
With regards to authorisation - maybe he does.
But then ... does he need authorisation to post what he does in his official capacity?
A third of the UK public believe ‘15-minute city’ plans are a government attempt to surveil people and restrict freedoms - The Guardian
From the looks of the other questions, a third of the UK public believe any old shite.
Dammit! You beat me to it!
The numbers for 'definitely true' are pretty constant, so I presume that - as you say - 10-12% will believe any old rubbish. I doubt that the same person who is absolutely convinced about the great reset will then turn around and say, "But 15 minute cities are a really great idea!".
(I note that the graph doesn't include the other fun things from the report - 12% definitely true that Covid was a global effort to force everyone to be vaccinated whether they wanted to or not, and 9% definitely true that the Covid pandemic was a hoax, and 7% definitely true that the London bombings were a false flag operation to raise support for military action in the Middle East and 6% definitely true that the Manchester Arena attack used crisis actors).
Lawd! Some people, eh...?
https://www.kcl.ac.uk/policy-institute/assets/conspiracy-belief-among-th...
The 'great replacement' theory - does that involves pods and would we know when we've been replaced?
Joke all you like, then wander down to the Comfort Inn Hotel in Westminster and try booking a room.
Is that where Braverman dumped a load of refugees without any communication to the local authority and without suitable accomodation?
Because freedom = being able to drive and park anywhere, anytime.
Meanwhile these are often the same people who think the Public Order Act was justified by JSO preventing people going to work, because they definitely aren't slave sheeple..
From The Guardian, 'nuff said.
Same tripe as the Daily Mail just a different flavour pushed on you. Why would Bill Gates donate GBP 12m to The Guardian I wonder?
After the past few years, I'm personally not very willing to swallow that from the Government and the media.
But it's a free country, so you can be a shill for them all you like. Get boosted for a fifth time while you're there.
Cue 'ah he's a tin foil hat waffler'....
It's actually a survey commissioned by the BBC and King's College London, but I expect they are part of the woke conspiracy as well.
Well if the (tin foil) cap fits...
I wonder what the prevalence of Lyme disease is, in Wallingford and Benson?
That picture of the cycle lane created around the trees has got to be fake?
No one could have thought that was a good idea?
Imagine if they started building car lanes like that, it'd definitely slow them down.
No - we'd never do anything as dumb as that in the UK...
wcc.crankfoot.xyz/facility-of-the-month/January2016.htm
wcc.crankfoot.xyz/facility-of-the-month/April2011.htm
Coronation Road, Bristol
That car isn't parked on the double yellows, so is it okay?
It's on the pedestrian side, so should be moved to block the cyclist side instead
The highway runs between the boundary of the private property on either side so technically is covered by the parking control. I watched a warden ticket someone once and was close enough to listen in. Apparently the motorist was accepting he was fully parked on the pavement and arguing that the warden couldn't ticket him for doing so. The warden told him he was still infringing the parking controls and a ticket was being issued.
It is.
Double-yellows regulate the pavement, too. Saw a comment from I think Andy Cox. It may be in the pinned resource thread on my twitter.
https://twitter.com/mattwardman/status/1614953595006517251
Anyhoo - driving on the pavement offence. Presumably enforcible against the estate of drivers who win Darwin Awards.
Seeing that car on its roof reminded me, did you see this in the Bristol Post?
https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/live-a420-high-street-wa...
An entire article about "a car [which] flipped over onto its roof. Avon and Somerset Police officers were at the scene following a crash which involved multiple vehicles and happened at around 4.35pm.".
Lots of commentary on how long the road was closed and how it impacted upon rush hour traffic flow.
No mention at all of any humans actually being involved in any of it...
Is it my imagination, or are we seeing more vehicles just flipping upside down?
Well it's harder for them to sploot in the heat right-side up... (repeat link I know but a good one).
Perhaps that is what happened here?
The drivist parks on double yellow and the sensors in the car realised, jumped it out of the way and ended up ladybirding on the pavement.
OR
It was parked on the cycle lane and those two cyclists took umbrage and flipped it out of their way? I shudder to think what they will do to that tree...
It should be okay as most Bristolians like their trees and nature unless they're Clifton residents that don't like birds sitting in the trees and sh*tting on their cars: https://www.bristol247.com/news-and-features/news/war-wildlife-anti-bird-spikes-clifton-trees-protect-cars-droppings/
It's the cars and statues that have to watch out
Plot twist - it was the tree that took umbrage with the car....
Perhaps none of the tyres are on the pavement, so it's OK? Also "I didn't drive onto the pavement! I was airbourne at the time".
did cyclists band together and tip it over so it wasn't blocking the cycle lane? No sign of damage to kerb or railings suggest it wasn't a crash.
Perhaps one of the most poetic pictures ever taken
Pages