Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

“Proper cyclists don’t need cycle lanes”: Locals blast “woke” bike lane works, as rugby club claims fans can’t get to matches during “chaos”

“What they are trying to do is make a Holland of us. It’s one of those woke agenda schemes,” one business owner said

A new cycleway project to encourage cycling and walking as a safe choice for shorter journeys has been branded “ridiculous” and “unnecessary” by locals, who claim that the lengthy construction work is creating “mayhem” and “chaos” in the town – including making it difficult for rugby fans to attend matches – while one business owner dismissed the new infrastructure as “woke” and asserted that “proper cyclists don’t need cycle lanes”.

The £3.6 million Broom Road cycling scheme in Rotherham features a range of improvements designed to make it safer and easier for cyclists and pedestrians to use a busy route connecting the south-east of the town to the centre, and includes 1.4km of dedicated bike lanes, three new signalised junctions, one new road crossing, and two improved crossings.

Rotherham Council claims the project will “encourage cycling and walking as a choice for shorter journeys”, while furthering the local authority’s ambition to “build a high-quality, joined-up network of cycle routes” in the South Yorkshire town.

However, the scheme – and in particular the current construction works – have come in for criticism from locals, who say traffic delays are becoming a “permanent fixture” for residents and creating a “very poor impression” of the town for visitors.

> New cycle path an “invasion of privacy” that will lead to “noise pollution” and anti-social behaviour, say residents

John Whaling, the commercial director for Rotherham Titans, a professional rugby union club which plays in the fourth tier of the English league, believes that the roadworks – located near the club’s Clifton Lane ground – are causing “chaos” for people who work nearby, while the club was forced to warn spectators to “leave early” to avoid missing the start of their match with Huddersfield last Saturday.

“This week they have closed off the roundabout that we access Badsley Moor Road from. This is to last eight weeks, in which time we have four home games which we hope are not affected, but it is clearly going to be a challenge for our spectators to get to the games,” Whaling told the Rotherham Advertiser.

“I had to go down to Magna and the roadworks along there are ridiculous and the queues into town stretched almost to the Meadowhall junction.”

He continued: “They have started multiple bicycle lane projects all at once and only seem to work on each one sporadically, hence the length of time it is taking to complete any of them.

“The ongoing saga on the road outside New York Stadium seems to be a permanent fixture now. We really are giving a very poor impression of the town to visitors and causing chaos for the people who work here.”

Meanwhile, a Rotherham business owner, who did not wish to be named, told the newspaper that the roadworks related to the project had resulted in “absolute mayhem”, and criticised the council for forging ahead with the “unnecessary” cycleway scheme, which he claims won’t be used by “proper cyclists” in any case.

“I was told they were frightened they would be knocked back on the money if they didn’t do the whole scheme in one go and that’s why it is such a mess,” he said.

“It seems to be being done without the proper resources, therefore creating absolute mayhem and it’s taking months and months.

“How many cyclists do you see in Rotherham? Proper cyclists don’t need cycle lanes and no-one else is going to cycle up Broom Lane.

“What they are trying to do is make a Holland of us. It’s one of those woke agenda schemes.”

> Controversial cycle lane roadworks blamed for “killing Christmas trade”

However, Rotherham Council’s assistant director for regeneration, planning, and transport, Simon Moss, says that during the consultation process carried out before the works commenced, the public was “broadly supportive” of the plans.

“We empathise with our residents and other road users and understand the frustrations they face when roadworks cause delays on our local networks, and we apologise for any inconvenience,” Moss said.

“We always endeavour to minimise the impact on other road users when we undertake such schemes and always seek to inform and consult with businesses, road users, and residents before work begins. The public consultation we carried out for the Broom Road scheme was broadly supportive.

“We do try and keep the impact of construction activity to a minimum, but we are conscious there is a lot of activity and investment going into road improvements here in Rotherham.

“This particular work is part of a £3.6m nationally funded active travel scheme which will soon make it far easier for our communities to lead an active and healthy lifestyle. While the money could have been spent on other similar schemes it could only be used for active travel purposes.”

> “Eyesore” cycling junction works leaving homes and cars “permanently covered in dirt and dust”, claim residents

Last month, we reported on similar criticism from locals concerning the construction of a new CYCLOPS junction in St Helen’s, Merseyside, which aims to protect pedestrians and cyclists by separating them from motor traffic and reducing crossing distances, while also cutting journey times for motorists.

The ten-month-long construction process, however, angered some residents, who claimed that the works and accompanying road closures have left their homes and businesses “inaccessible” and “permanently covered in dirt and dust”.

“I’ve had to have the car valeted twice now because it’s driving me mad,” one local said, while also arguing that there was “nothing wrong” with the original roundabout.

After obtaining a PhD, lecturing, and hosting a history podcast at Queen’s University Belfast, Ryan joined road.cc in December 2021 and since then has kept the site’s readers and listeners informed and enthralled (well at least occasionally) on news, the live blog, and the road.cc Podcast. After boarding a wrong bus at the world championships and ruining a good pair of jeans at the cyclocross, he now serves as road.cc’s senior news writer. Before his foray into cycling journalism, he wallowed in the equally pitiless world of academia, where he wrote a book about Victorian politics and droned on about cycling and bikes to classes of bored students (while taking every chance he could get to talk about cycling in print or on the radio). He can be found riding his bike very slowly around the narrow, scenic country lanes of Co. Down.

Add new comment

40 comments

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to AidanR | 1 year ago
3 likes

You snowflakes! The residents of Leith woke up to Leith Walk being repeatedly dug up for the trams, then put back again, for about a decade. And they even put in cycle paths - admittedly not very convenient ones.

Now *that's* woke!

Avatar
eburtthebike | 1 year ago
14 likes

"Proper cyclists don’t need cycle lanes and no-one else is going to cycle up Broom Lane."

I'm sure that there are plenty of local cyclists who will be only too happy to refute the assertion that you can't ride up Broom Lane.

He's right about proper cyclists not needing cycle lanes though: it's drivers who need them.

Avatar
Spangly Shiny replied to eburtthebike | 1 year ago
1 like

What he/she means is that because Broom Lane is so steep (10%+) only 'proper' cyclists will want to ride up it. The intimation being that 'proper' cyclists don't really need the infra. Having to stick to the new infra coming down means braking all the way, so no fun to be had there.
Mind you the extension of the cycle lanes on Sheffield Road by the Bessemer Park roundabout is a real PITA. I work out of Bessemer Park and the roundabout works going on there stick at least ½ hour onto my day, every day.

Avatar
Geordiepeddeler replied to Spangly Shiny | 1 year ago
2 likes

And that will be there forever? No. If you've ever lived in the Netherlands and see how much cycling improves lives you will see it's a no brainer.

Avatar
qwerty360 replied to Spangly Shiny | 1 year ago
1 like

Of course while 10%+ will scare off a chunk of recreational/new riders, as a 'proper cyclist' it is one of the places with by far the most benefit for me.

On flat urban roads I can mostly coexist with traffic because I can maintain the same speed (even if I still want cycle paths built to standard).

On a 10% incline my speed is going to drop enough to be below the 11mph typical of busy urban roads. The low speed also disrupts stability, so the lane needs to be wider, and creates a greater divergence between rider speeds - generally hill climbing is a lot easier to do at a consistent speed for your style (i.e. it could be harder for someone half my weight and twice my fitness to follow at my slow pace than power up to the top at 3x the speed I can do, between gear ratios, bike design, keeping momentum into steeper bits etc...) so need room for people to overtake...

Avatar
momove | 1 year ago
3 likes

Seemingly without any sense of self awareness:

“How many cyclists do you see in Rotherham? Proper cyclists don’t need cycle lanes and no-one else is going to cycle up Broom Lane."

Avatar
Rendel Harris | 1 year ago
8 likes

Please can we continue to say signal-controlled junctions and not use this new coinage "signalised"? I know language is always evolving et cetera et cetera et cetera, but that's really ugly!

Avatar
the little onion replied to Rendel Harris | 1 year ago
7 likes

Is it a woke virtue-signal-controlled junction?

Avatar
eburtthebike replied to Rendel Harris | 1 year ago
3 likes

Rather like "linkage" when link is perfectly adequate.

Avatar
TheBillder replied to Rendel Harris | 1 year ago
2 likes

If I were a proper technical person, I'd find a way to prevent my Garmin from using "off of". Grates every time.

Pages

Latest Comments