Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Grant Shapps: Cyclists should have number plates, be insured and subject to speed limits

Transport Secretary pledges tougher rules on bike riders as part of current legal review

17/08/22, 11:52: Read our update to this story here: Confusion as Grant Shapps now says he is "not attracted to bureaucracy" of number plates for cyclists

Transport Secretary Grant Shapps has said that cyclists should be insured, carry licence plates on their bikes, and be subject to the same speed limits as motorists.

The Tory cabinet minister told the Mail that putting such measures in place would be considered as part of the current review that may see a causing death by dangerous cycling law introduced.

It’s less than a fortnight since Shapps, who was appointed Secretary of State for Transport by Boris Johnson in July 2019, outlined his plans to the Mail for that legislation – but his position set out in the same newspaper this evening, and said to have the support of Whitehall officials, goes way beyond that.

> Government to crack down on “reckless” riders with causing death by dangerous cycling law

This evening Shapps, who risks losing his cabinet post once Conservative leadership contenders Liz Truss or Rishi Sunak puts their cabinet together next month, insisted cyclists should be subject to the same laws as motorists – including abiding by speed limits, being insured, and carrying identifiable registration plates.

In particular, he is said to be concerned about cyclists riding at speeds above 20mph, which he claims they can “easily exceed” – even though the speed of e-bikes legal for road use, for instance, is capped at 15.5mph, and the vast majority of people riding bicycles would never approach such a speed on flat roads, nor are bikes required to be fitted with speedometers.

He told the newspaper: “Somewhere where cyclists are actually not breaking the law is when they speed, and that cannot be right, so I absolutely propose extending speed limit restrictions to cyclists.

“Particularly where you’ve got 20mph limits on increasing numbers of roads, cyclists can easily exceed those, so I want to make speed limits apply to cyclists.

“That obviously does then lead you into the question of ‘well, how are you going to recognise the cyclist, do you need registration plates and insurance and that sort of thing’.

“So I’m proposing there should be a review of insurance and how you actually track cyclists who do break the laws.”

Requiring cyclists to carry some form of identification, such as a numbered tabard – suggested by motoring lawyer Nick Freeman, also quoted in the Mail’s article – is seen by some as an answer to the perceived problem of the minority of cyclists who ride recklessly, including jumping red lights.

But advocates of such schemes – which where they have been implemented, tend to be ditched quickly because of the cost of administering them, plus the fact they discourage cycling and the health and other benefits associated with it – tend to ignore the greater harm that law-breaking motorists, in vehicles that already carry registration plates, can do.

Nevertheless, Shapps continued: “I don’t want to stop people from getting on their bike, it’s a fantastic way to travel, we’ve seen a big explosion of cycling during Covid and since, I think it has lots of health benefits.

“But I see no reason why cyclists should break the road laws, why they should speed, why they should bust red lights and be able to get away with it and I think we do have to not turn a blind eye to that and I’m proposing setting up a review to do exactly that,” he added.

Most adult cyclists do in fact have liability insurance, whether under their household insurance policy or bike insurance, or through membership of organisations such as British Cycling or Cycling UK.

As the law stands at the moment, they are not required to carry third party insurance – unlike motorists, who are obliged by law to have that as a minimum, although that has not prevented an estimated million or more drivers taking to British roads without such cover.

The Mail also claimed that cyclists found guilty of killing a pedestrian face a maximum of two years in jail, which is incorrect.

True, that is the maximum jail term that can be imposed on someone found guilty of causing bodily harm through wanton or furious driving under the Offences Against The Person Act 1861.

But in two high-profile cases in the past five years in which cyclists were convicted of that offence following the death of a pedestrian, they were also acquitted of manslaughter – which carries a maximum punishment of life imprisonment.

By contrast, causing death by dangerous driving has a maximum jail term of 14 years – although since June this year, it has been increased to life if the motorist was under the influence of drink or drugs.

According to a report last year from the Parliamentary Advisory Council for Transport Safety, just one in 100 crashes in 2019 that resulted in the death of a pedestrian was due to a cyclist – compared to 65 in which a driver was to blame.

In July, when he resigned as Conservative Party leader, thereby putting in motion the battle not only for who would succeed him to that post, but also as Prime Minister, we asked whether Boris Johnson’s departure would be a blow for active travel, including cycling.

> Boris Johnson resignation: A blow for active travel?

Neither Truss – his likely successor – nor Sunak are known as huge supporters of walking and cycling, and it could well be that Shapps’ comments tonight, which some might interpret as a dog-whistle to party members, could be an attempt to curry favour with the next Prime Minister and ensure he stays in post.

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

125 comments

Avatar
eburtthebike replied to mdavidford | 1 year ago
4 likes

mdavidford wrote:

hawkinspeter wrote:

 think there is zero chance that our politicians would vote for that as they seem to be just working for their own benefit, not for the public.

They're working?

Yes; for their own benefit.

Avatar
The Larger Cyclist replied to cmedred | 1 year ago
4 likes

Just looking on Wikipedia about the "Idaho Stop" and love the fact it was a Mr  Bianchi behind it!

Avatar
AlsoSomniloquism | 1 year ago
11 likes

As mentioned by others, I suspect this is just dog whistling for a position in the new cabinet when the successor is chosen. After all the Government is supposed to be cutting costs and civil workforce then wants to bring in a plan that would be unenforceable.

I suspect at the end of the "consultation", it will be decided, like it has many many times before not something suitable to bring in. 

Avatar
eburtthebike | 1 year ago
13 likes

“But I see no reason why cyclists should break the road laws, why they should speed, why they should bust red lights and be able to get away with it and I think we do have to not turn a blind eye to that and I’m proposing setting up a review to do exactly that,” he added."

Would that be the complete, thorough review of road laws announced by this ultra-shambles of a tory government all those years ago?  Or just another cyclist-bashing one?

Meanwhile, drivers who are already subject to all these rules but ignore them routinely, kill and maim thousands every year; but they aren't the problem, it's the cyclists.

Avatar
mdavidford replied to eburtthebike | 1 year ago
3 likes

Setting up a review to turn a blind eye to cyclists speeding and busting red lights seems like a massive waste of money anyway.

Avatar
Secret_squirrel replied to mdavidford | 1 year ago
3 likes

The cynical part of me suggests that this is all hot air pandering to the Tory faithful whilst the leadership election is in full swing.   After which the "review" will be quietly shelved.

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to eburtthebike | 1 year ago
2 likes

eburtthebike wrote:

“But I see no reason why cyclists should break the road laws, why they should speed, why they should bust red lights and be able to get away with it and I think we do have to not turn a blind eye to that and I’m proposing setting up a review to do exactly that,” he added."

Would that be the complete, thorough review of road laws announced by this ultra-shambles of a tory government all those years ago?  Or just another cyclist-bashing one?

Meanwhile, drivers who are already subject to all these rules but ignore them routinely, kill and maim thousands every year; but they aren't the problem, it's the cyclists.

Doesn't he want the drivers to forgo training/licencing for driving heavier vehicles?

Avatar
Steve K | 1 year ago
5 likes

If it wasn't for the practical issue of speedometers, I wouldn't have a problem with speed limits applying to cyclists.  However, I do have a problem with a Minister saying this whilst being silent on motorists speeding in 20mph zone when his own Department's statistics show that more than 80% of drivers do so (and yet only 5% of drivers have points on their licenses - so enforcement is clearly pretty much close to zero).

Avatar
IanMK | 1 year ago
13 likes

I'd like to see the evidence that says having a number plate stops road users ignoring the law. Regardless, surely, a 20tt century solution. We're in the 21st century. Why not just have electronic tagging for all road vehicles. Let's be honest Google know where I am all of the time why shouldn't the Police. Oh.... because it's not about road safety it's about appeasing the gammons.

Avatar
Steve K replied to IanMK | 1 year ago
3 likes

IanMK wrote:

I'd like to see the evidence that says having a number plate stops road users ignoring the law.

The evidence shows completely the opposite - compare rates of speeding with proportion of drivers with points on their licenses

Avatar
brooksby | 1 year ago
12 likes

This is just read meat sh!t to gain the support of the gammony folk at the DM, and to advertise that he's evil enough to join Truss's new cabinet.

So, where to start? Here's a bit of a random brainfart

Cyclists and pedestrians and equestrians all have a right to use the highway.  They are not licenced to use it.  Is he intending to revoke the ancient right of those groups to use the highway (what would Rees-Mogg think of that)?  Is he intending to make pedestrians have to show papers to walk to the shops?

Speed limits.  Bikes aren't subject to a speed limit because they don't have speedometers fitted.  Is he intending to introduce legislation forcing people to retrofit speedometers to their bikes?  Where will all these highly accurate speedometers come from?

Number plates on bicycles.  OK, so if that works the same as on cars then do we just get to fail to notify who was riding at any particular time?  If not, is he proposing that it's the rider who is registered rather than the bike?  Which is a great deal more draconian than motorists get.

Insurance. We all know that a large number of cyclists already have appropriate insurance either through house insurance or through membership of BC or CUK.  We also know that a great many motorists are driving around without insurance. 

Given the sh!tshow at the DVLA at the moment, how much extra money is he planning to throw at them to help them deal with all this extra paperwork?  Will that money be more or less than the money raised by the selling of bicycle licences?

Why is a Govt which is so very keen to remove the nanny state and reduce taxes (on major businesses, in particular: ref. freeports) so willing to increase the legislative and financial burden on a large sector of the population by such an unprecedented method?  Is it just that cyclists are deemed not to contribute enough to the economy so he wants to get revenge (hmm - a war on the cyclists, anyone)?

(yes, I know this all a bit of a strawman, but he started it).

Avatar
pockstone | 1 year ago
10 likes

I feel a bout of civil disobedience coming on. 

 

Avatar
Nikolai | 1 year ago
9 likes

Discussing the same issue with The Times this morning Shapps makes it clear that he's not interested in the bureaucracy of number plates.

A law on speeding and light jumping could be brought in but would only lead to prosecution if directly witnessed, presumably by police.

It's hard to see why he's bothered about something so unimportant as cyclists speeding, but given the culture wars he will get A LOT of correspondence from voters on this. He has to respond to it somehow.

Shapes isn't the problem, its a broader thing. Its the British.

Avatar
BalladOfStruth replied to Nikolai | 1 year ago
3 likes

Nikolai wrote:

A law on speeding and light jumping could be brought in ...

Only by forcing the bike industry to make every bike a few hundred quid more expensive by fitting a GPS speedometer at the factory. You can't do people for speeding if it's impossible to know how fast you're going.

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to BalladOfStruth | 1 year ago
2 likes
BalladOfStruth wrote:

Nikolai wrote:

A law on speeding and light jumping could be brought in ...

Only by forcing the bike industry to make every bike a few hundred quid more expensive by fitting a GPS speedometer at the factory...

I think I'm sensing support already from much of the bike industry, particularly purveyors of powered bikes and scooters... Actually having that as a requirement for *sale* - like pedal reflectors - doesn't sound world-ending.

I don't believe this could do anything for safety though - at least not in any foreseeable future that Shapps is a part of. Because we don't have mass cycling and his party aren't interested in making that happen. As I'm sure he's sensible enough to realise that it cannot be an honest proposal, it's political manoeuvring.

Avatar
kamoshika replied to BalladOfStruth | 1 year ago
5 likes

BalladOfStruth wrote:

You can't do people for speeding if it's impossible to know how fast you're going.

As a cyclist I can just base my speed on the law-abiding motorists around me, then I can be confident that I'm not exceeding the limit. After all, they're all carry number plates that make them identifiable, so they wouldn't possible dare to break the limit.

Avatar
Secret_squirrel replied to Nikolai | 1 year ago
3 likes

Nikolai wrote:

Shapps isn't the problem, its a broader thing. Its the British.

Not the British - the Gammons who are a small but vocal subset.   Its all about posturing for them and the Newspapers that feed their fake culture wars.  This is basically the UK right wing trying to redirect the passion that barely got brexit over the line to other uses.   

Problem is whilst they are wasting their energy on the fake culture wars they are ignoring all the real problems and people are starting to call that out.

Avatar
mattw replied to Secret_squirrel | 1 year ago
2 likes

I don't think its purely The Gammons either.

Most of the hoons I see driving cars tend to be youngish men, and quite a lot of the outraged rantaloons can be of the female gender. Remember that funeral convoy in Nottingham - M Driver F Ranter iirc.

We need accurate stereotypes smiley

Avatar
chrisonabike | 1 year ago
7 likes

I was just enjoying my daily dose of bile with a froth of righteous indignation when I suddenly thought - does this actually mean they're really going to start holding all road users to the same rules? So actually enforcing 20mph limits (and others) for *motorists*? And maybe holding those who kill and injure on the roads properly accountable? Could it be there will be measures to have some way of actually identifying *drivers*?

Maybe they'll even bring in licence, MOT and tax checks in Lancashire?

Is this that comprehensive review of road law by stealth?

Avatar
eburtthebike replied to chrisonabike | 1 year ago
6 likes

chrisonatrike wrote:

I was just enjoying my daily dose of bile with a froth of righteous indignation when I suddenly thought - does this actually mean they're really going to start holding all road users to the same rules? So actually enforcing 20mph limits (and others) for *motorists*? And maybe holding those who kill and injure on the roads properly accountable? Could it be there will be measures to have some way of actually identifying *drivers*? Maybe they'll even bring in licence, MOT and tax checks in Lancashire? Is this that comprehensive review of road law by stealth?

NO.

Avatar
ymm | 1 year ago
3 likes

Ha ha, 🤣 what a gem of a story this is. Some much comedy material in the story, I literally dont know where to start. Speeding cyclists? Does G Shatts ever use the road? TBH, with this collective of fools, that we call a Govt, vulnerable road users have little to fear in terms of further hassles. Just imagine the multitude of hurdles and bureaucratic barriers that this so called idea has to pass through, not to mention cost. This, in combination with staggeringly incompetent ministers, could be one to watch and be entertained by. Authorities cannot even get to grips with those that have number plates and insurance at the moment!

Avatar
Car Delenda Est | 1 year ago
3 likes

Can we please do something about the fact that cars just stream through green men nowadays? Apparently it's legal if everyone is doing it too. It's never safe to be near a road.

Avatar
Steve K | 1 year ago
9 likes

So depressing.  Hopefully the sheer impracticability of it all will prevent it going any further.  The 20 mph speed limit stuff is just laughable.  Yes, I often slightly exceed 20mph (maybe getting to 34km/h) in the 20 zone in my village.  But no car ever waits behind me when I do - I am always overtaken.  (I'm also often overtaken when driving at 20mph through it.) 

Avatar
JimM777 | 1 year ago
4 likes

I presume that roller skates, skateboards, and scooters (where electric or not) will also require number plates, and their users insurance?

Avatar
Hirsute replied to JimM777 | 1 year ago
1 like

Scooters should only be the official trial ones which have a tiny plate - good luck with getting a photo of that !

Avatar
SimoninSpalding replied to Hirsute | 1 year ago
4 likes

We don't have any of those hire scooters out here in the sticks, but I see plenty of privately owned ones out and about on public roads, often at night, with no lights. This is against current laws which don't seem to be enforced so I have nothing to fear from the requirement to have a number plate on my bike.

Avatar
Hirsute replied to SimoninSpalding | 1 year ago
5 likes

You should fear cutting your leg on the plate as you dismount !

(Where do you put a plate on a bike anyway? And to be big enough to be read how will it not present a danger to the rider or other riders and pedestrians ?)

Avatar
SurreyHiller replied to Hirsute | 1 year ago
3 likes

Number plate could be 1.5m wide and extend out to the right?

Avatar
Car Delenda Est | 1 year ago
3 likes

I had wondered how, with a pro-cycling PM, an electoral mandate to build cycle infra, and the COVID cycling boom, we still managed to fall so far behind European countries with none of these.
Now I know it was this incompetent goon.

Avatar
eburtthebike replied to Car Delenda Est | 1 year ago
2 likes

Car Delenda Est wrote:

I had wondered how, with a pro-cycling PM, an electoral mandate to build cycle infra, and the COVID cycling boom, we still managed to fall so far behind European countries with none of these. Now I know it was this incompetent goon.

To be fair, there are lots of incompetent goons in this government, some of them even less competent than him!

Pages

Latest Comments