At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
.
I have a fairly powerful front light, owing to the fact I do go on and off road, and sometimes in total darkness. However I chose one with various...
Yes, that seems to be the collision that fits the description:...
Things are complex in such nations. Countries like Russia and China are very too big and diverse and do not have a clear ethnic conscience. There...
I disagree, this needs to cite primary publications. As far as know PTFE (Teflon) is not linked to cancer but chemicals used in its production are...
Do they have Apple's AI writing their headlines for them?
They're new products, I agree, but more evolutionary than fundamentally innovative. I don't downplay the quality of their design and build - it's...
And my point was, that's... not true.
Not enough information on this case to make any meaningful comments but a couple of points. Roads aren't dangerous, some drivers are. If all...
I can remember, back in the mists of time, when Dylan were a lad, both the Times and Panorama were serious media, not click bait farms. Just like...