At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
How the feck can it be legal to drive a large PSV at 75 years old?
No one pays road tax. See above.
Absolutely not a victim blaming – the blame lies 100% with the driver of the truck – but I've been stuck in that position too many times in London,...
I love the irony of this. The Met was stopping and warning/prosecuting speeding cyclists under the RP Regs, but the RP insisted that (despite the...
A pity, not least because for a while CHPT3 was turning out some really good kit - certainly the casual/off-bike range was higher quality than most...
While consumers can be divided into different market segments, the boundaries are blurred. I considered every quality brand (including Le Col)...
Careful what you wish for!...
Six times the review mentions that the light is slow to charge, but not once does it actually say how long it takes!
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c8j9lky02dlo Man gives up on electric car after charging ordeal
Reading road crime stories on here and elsewhere, it certainly seems that the police only really follow up cases which they believe will be a...