Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

TECH NEWS

Zipp "reaffirms" safety of its hookless rims, but now advises teams to use tyres no smaller than 29mm

Zipp’s latest statement continues to claim "unfortunate impact failures" that could happen with any rim/tyre combo were to blame for two separate incidents at the UAE Tour and Strade Bianche, where the riders’ tyres completely detached from the rim

In the wake of the recent controversies surrounding hookless rims, Zipp has released another, more comprehensive statement "reaffirming" the safety and integrity of its products. The announcement comes after incidents at the UAE Tour and Strade Bianche, which raised concerns about the structural stability of Zipp's 353 NSW front wheels and hookless rim designs in general, with Zipp claiming its own internal testing, statements from the riders affected and footage confirmed that "major impact forces" were to blame. The brand has, however, advised teams to run tyres that are at least 29mm wide going forward. 

The tumultuous aftermath of these crashes, including Thomas De Gendt's mishap at the UAE Tour and Johannes Adamietz's similar incident at Strade Bianche, prompted Zipp – and Vittoria, whose tyre was used – to release statements declaring the events had no connection to hookless rims or the tyre used. Since those, Zipp has taken the two front wheels into its Indianapolis labs to conduct thorough reviews and investigations. Now publishing the results, the company has concluded that both crashes were directly caused by "major impact forces"; in other words, we suspect this could refer to rocks or other objects on the road.

Zipp said this is backed by race video footage, statements from Thomas De Gendt, Johannes Adamietz, the Lotto DSTNY team, its own internal impact and inflation testing of the tyre and wheel combination, and dissection of the 353 NSW wheel returned from the Lotto DSTNY team at the UAE Tour. 

Johannes Adamietz's hookless incident at Strade Bianche

Though the not-so-eagle-eyed were able to see the object causing the impact, with the statement Zipp aims to put a stop to suggestions that the crashes were due to a mismatch between the 25mm internal rim and the 28mm Vittoria Corsa Pro tyre instead. According to ISO standards, which were updated in summer 2023, the Zipp 353s, having that rim width, are recommended to only be used with tyres of 29mm or wider. 

> Pro cyclists’ union “not happy” with hookless wheels after “freak” blowout causes Thomas De Gendt crash

These changes to the ISO standards should have been communicated to all teams racing at UCI-sanctioned events before the 2024 season started, but to drill the message in, the UCI also "decided to study the situation as a matter of urgency with a view to taking a rapid decision in the interest of rider safety." 

Zipp rim detail

Zipp now recommends pro teams follow the recommended standards:

"While the combination of 28 mm label tyres with a 25 mm internal rim width was an ISO-approved combination until recently and has been raced safely in the peloton for three seasons now, we are advising all of our teams to strictly adhere to the ISO tyre and rim compatibility chart out of an abundance of caution - all of our teams will be advised to run no smaller than a 29mm label TSS-compatible tyre on our 25mm internal rim widths."

Zipp continued to state that the incidents had no connection to the wheels' construction: "Our carbon laminate dissection showed the wheel construction met Zipp’s prescribed carbon laminate design and processing standards, reassuring that unfortunate impact failures could be expected with any carbon wheel product regardless of rim type or tyre size. Both breakages were wholly unrelated to the hookless design of the rim or the tyre and rim width combination."

The brand also remains steadfast in advocating hookless wheels, listing reduced retail prices, easier tubeless installation, lighter weights, and superior performance as their benefits.

What does this mean for customers?

Of course, it's not just professional cyclists using Zipp's hookless wheels, and since we first published this article questions have been raised over what this latest advice might mean for customers. 

While Zipp insists the 28mm tyre/25mm internal rim combination was not the cause of the UAE Tour and Strade Bianche incidents, conversely it is now advising pro teams to run "no smaller than a 29mm label TSS-compatible tyre" out of "an abundance of caution". 

At the time of writing, it doesn’t appear that this advice extends to owners of Zipp's hookless road wheels. Zipp’s compatibility chart currently recommends many tyres below 29mm on its 25mm hookless rims, and as narrow as 27mm in the case of the Challenge H-TLR Criterium RS.

We've asked Zipp to clarify its position, and whether all owners are also advised to run tyres with a minimum stated width of 29mm going forward, and will update this article when we hear back. 

Suvi joined F-At in 2022, first writing for off-road.cc and then road.cc and ebiketips too until August 2024. She contributed to all of the sites covering tech news, features, reviews and women's cycling content. A lover of long-distance cycling, Suvi is easily convinced to join any rides and events that cover over 100km, and ideally, plenty of cake and coffee stops. 

Add new comment

36 comments

Avatar
OnYerBike replied to Matthew Acton-Varian | 9 months ago
0 likes

Matthew Acton-Varian wrote:

Firstly - those Shimano failures are on the rear. It is much easier to balance and stop when your back wheel disintegrates - almost impossible for the front as what the case for De Gendt. Just watch fixie riders tring the longest skid - it's the same skill to control the bike just different circumstances. Had the failures been on the front, I can guarantee those riders would have crashed in the same way De Gendt did. The wheel would jam in the forks and instantly stop turning, regardless of whether the tyre was still attached to the rim or not.

I tried to be clear - I agree with this. Those particular failures could have lead to far more serious consequences, and it was blind luck (and excellent bike handling skills) they didn't.

 

Matthew Acton-Varian wrote:

I wouldn't expect an ETRTO approved hookless system to be significantly easier to roll off than a tyre on a hooked rim.

This is really the nub of the issue. My argument is is that this is not true - that a hookless rim means a tyre is more likely to blow off in the event of damage to the rim (and potentially even with an undamaged rim). And therefore there are some situations where that could be the difference between stopping safely, and a dangerous crash.

It won't make a difference in every situation - yes if your wheel literally folds in half, you're pretty screwed anyway. But I think hookless is still increasing the liklihood of a more serious incident occuring compared to hooked or tubular. 

Avatar
a1white replied to Matthew Acton-Varian | 9 months ago
0 likes

Do they have an image of the rock he hit? I mean that is a catastrophic rim failure. Hookless or not

Avatar
KDee replied to a1white | 9 months ago
0 likes

Exactly, and how did the rest of the 150 riders or so (I don't think TdG was in a breakway at the time) miss this thing?

Show us the Go-Pro footage!

Avatar
Backladder replied to Matthew Acton-Varian | 9 months ago
0 likes

Matthew Acton-Varian wrote:

Wht hasn't been included in this article is an image of the rim completely cracked that was released by Zipp upon receipt of the wheel.

I don't think many carbon rims of any tyre interface would have survived the impact in question.

Difficult to say for certain without testing but I suspect a tubular rim is stronger in that type of impact as it is an enclosed shape, once a crack has started in the unsupported raised side of a hooked or hookless rim it may be more likely to propagate through the rest of the rim.

Avatar
Matthew Acton-Varian replied to Backladder | 9 months ago
1 like

Unlikely. A rim sidewall failure would not necessarily propagate radially inwards - it could just snap at the joint to the rim bed if that was the case. There might be a small window of impact force where that is the case, but any impact strong enough to go through the rim sidewall and crack the rim bed of a clincher or hookless wheel could still potentially crack the rim bed of a tubular.

Avatar
Veganpotter replied to rct | 9 months ago
0 likes

Tons of tubulars have rolled off of rims😂

Pages

Latest Comments