Chris Froome, defending champion in the Tour de France, has abandoned the race. The Team Sky rider crashed heavily yesterday, sustaining injuries including one to his left wrist, and fell twice more today on rain-soaked roads in northern France on today's Stage 5 from Ypres to Arenberg-Porte de Hainaut.
After his second fall, which came as the peloton sped towards the first of seven cobbled sections on today's route, Froome looked in severe pain and was clearly in no position to get back on his bike, instead climbing into the team car, the defence of his title over.
It’s more than a decade since it last rained here on the day of the Queen of the Classics, held in April each year. The forecast for today, however, had been for heavy rain and that’s how it turned out, with organsisers deciding to cut two of the planned nine sectors of pave – neither of them among the more difficult, admittedly – ahead of the start this morning.
Froome’s defence of his title came to an end shortly before the Carrefour de l’Arbre, the first of the remaining seven sections. The 29-year-old had possibly fractured his left wrist yesterday – x-rays taken last evening proved inconclusive – and took to the start this morning with splints on both wrists and handlebars heavily strapped to try and soften the impact of the cobbles.
He never made it that far. Crashing early on as a result of rain-soaked roads, ripping the right-hand side of his bibshorts and losing his race number, 1, denoting his status as defending champion, he came down heavily again with around 60km of the 152.5km stage which crossed some of the key battlefields of World War I.
Following that conflict, when a journalist from l’Auto, the newspaper that organised Paris-Roubaix at the time, headed north from Paris in 1919 to see whether the race could be held again on the battle-ravaged landscape, he described it in one word – “l’Enfer” – thereby giving the race its other nickname, “l’Enfer du Nord” or “the Hell of the North.”
While today’s route had just seven cobbled sections compared to the 27 that feature in the Spring Classic, seldom in recent years has the one-day race lived up to that nickname as much as this afternoon in the Tour de France is turning out to be.
Add new comment
81 comments
Not a Frome fan either after reading the book, and situation caused in Sky. Sky should have been able to put their two best riders in the squad for exactly this reason. Porte is good but not as good as Wiggins - full stop.
Frankly I feel Brailsford denied the UK its right to see Wiggins riding in the UK on three stages because he wasn't able to manage them.
A sad day for the UK through the failure of three of supposedly UK's finest sportspeople to be able to work as a team.
'Froome just hasn't looked convincing all season. Pressure/nerves or just a poor steak.'
FTFY.
Are you suggesting Nibali was on the juice yesterday?
Having a sore wrist on the cobbles must be painful. Maybe Froome should have got some advice from his team-mate Thomas "We are allowed the normal painkillers - ibuprofen and paracetamol - and a few coffees in the morning helps. Then it comes down to the whole mental side of not giving up. At times in Corsica it felt like I could not pedal"
Ah excellent, all the armchair DS's are out in force. All the expert managers who know each and every rider.
The crash happened before the peloton had even seen a cobble so to say that the cause was bad bike handling on coobbles is just rubbish. 200 nervous jittery bike riders, a threatening parcours and bad weather, everyone trying to be in the front 20 so the pace was averaging near 50kph which is insanely fast.
People were crashing left right and centre, Chris was just unlucky.
As for the "there should have been 2 leaders", that's also a bad idea, it never works. You build a team round ONE leader. And not sure where the idea that Brad would have done any better is coming from; he did one good ride on dry cobbles a few months ago and that's it, he's hardly renowned for amazing bike handling in the wet himself (cough *Giro* cough).
It's just bad luck - it's very disappointing but Sky were in the same boat when Wiggins crashed out with a broken collarbone a few years ago; no-one was shouting then that they should have had a second leader or a Plan B. You have your Plan A and then you trust to luck. That's bike racing.
At least Froome can now nick Wiggo's place in the Commonwealth Games team
Is it just me, but when I look at the froome first crash, which is what caused the wrist issue and contributed to him pulling out yesterday as he couldn't handle his bike properly, that he was caught half wheeling in the peloton, so when the rider moved to the right he was taken down. I think this school boy error is route cause of his abandon.
Froomes stage 4 crash was shit... it wasn't a lack of skill on his part, it was a Bretagne whatever rider who deviated massively off his line. No one could account for that happening.
I wonder if that chap feels a bit bad now?
Armchair DS-ing; isn't that one of the great joys of watching cycling? Indeed one of the joys of many a sport. Done with respect, it's great.
No real surprise to me that Nibali did well yesterday. his bike handling skills are second to none out of the GC guys. i was surprised that Contador didn't do better.
'Why make insinuations against one rider, but not another?'
why not?
I think it's really refreshing to see a stage where it's not all about watts/kg, power meters and all that bollox but who can actually ride a bike in less than perfect conditions.. Well done Nibbles.
Couple of points about Nibali. He isn't a pure climber - look at his results in Milan-San Remo, year in, year out.
He's one of the best riders in the world in filthy conditions. His team undertook several recces of this stage, clearly had a plan and executed it to perfection.
He alone of the GC contenders had the 'palle' to take the two most difficult stages of the opening week of the race by the scruff of the neck and he's been rewarded handsomely.
Of course, he could always be doping on that new drug people are talking about - you know, the one that gives you an unfair advantage by helping you stay upright in the wet
Been doing this too long to ever be surprised by anything that comes out eventually about any rider, but playing the tactical game better than your rivals does not necessarily equal doping
I too was looking forward to a Froome/Contador showdown, but it could so easily have been nullified by them marking each other until the TT. We now have a finely poised race which Bertie can only win by going on the rampage in the mountains .
Froome has just posted on Twitter: "MRIs done, confirmed fractures to the left wrist & right hand. Time for some R&R..."
Looks like he's out of action for a while then, no wonder he didn't climb back on.
So, a climber unusually beats a number of highly experienced classics riders, and yet people are still obsessed with outing Froome as a doper....?
I wasn't aware this was in our rights, I'll bear that in mind if I'm ever arrested.
It's a racing peloton of 200 riders, not a bloody club run!
People are constantly moving up, down, through and around the bunch! At some point yes, of course you're going to be half wheeling, bumping elbows and knees, clashing bars, overtaking, being overtaken, being pushed off your line....
Maybe you should offer your services to Team Sky as a skills coach as you're clearly an exceptional bike handler, better than all the riders in the Tour...
No, just noting that some out-of-the-ordinary performances are overlooked, while others seem to be used as 'evidence' against a rider just because someone don't like them.
Your reference to 'steak' suggests that you believe Froome to be using something, while making no notice of the fact that another climber was putting in an unexpectedly good performance on a flat stage.
Why make insinuations against one rider, but not another?
If you can't see there's anything inherently wrong in that, or indeed taking sections of my post out of context, then go ahead.
Tbh riding pave is all about power and bike handling of which nibbles has both in abundance so you are partly right .....I still can't believe he was 500 to 1 for the stage
You'd need to be hard as nails just to wipe your arse!
Two leaders never works? What about 2012 when Sky got first and second - with Wiggo and Froome? Or 1986, when Lemond won and his teammate Hinault came second?
Thanks. It's so difficult to know where to draw the line. If you wanted some comment on Nibali too, then why not various others? Why is two better than one? Why not seventeen? It all seems a bit arbitrary. If you could provide further guidelines, that'd be great.
Yes, I agree your targeting of one individual without evidence is abitrary, but I wouldn't ask you to over-compensate by making up things about all the other riders too as you'd be there all day.
Guidelines? How about: if you have facts- say so. If you don't - then don't.
Easy really, I'm surprised you needed it spelt out but I'm glad that I can help.
Ah yes, "Liberté, égalité, fraternité et Wiggo pour trois etapes".
Right up there with clean water and education for me.
You could always have gone to the National Championships, or up to the Commonwealth Games?
So basically you're saying that an elite pro cyclist with 7 years of career under his belt. Winner of TdF, runner up in TdF, winner of Critérium du Dauphiné (2013)
Tour de Romandie (2013, 2014) Critérium International (2013) Tour of Oman (2013, 2014) etc can't ride a bike very well.
I am not sure I am buying that.
I remember when Pinarello announced the new Dogma that it was supposedly "16% more balanced"... Sadly that doesn't seem to be balanced enough...
Porte looks good for a podium place with Thomas and Nieve as lieutenants. I think the latter in particular could really pull something out of the bag for his new team leader.
Bummed about Froome. It's a wicked, wicked sport we follow, isn't it?
Nibali has it sewn up? Don't think so personally. Did you see Dauphiné? Long way to go. Lets hope for some almighty battles in the stages left!
Pages