Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

TECH NEWS

First ride review: Bowman Cycles Pilgrims disc-equipped aluminium road bike

A first ride on the new Bowman Pilgrims aluminium disc road bike

Bowman Cycles, the Kent-based company behind the Palace aluminium frameset that road.cc reviewed earlier this year, has just launched its second model, the disc-equipped Pilgrims. I headed along to Surrey last week to take it for a spin and see what it’s all about.

The new Pilgrims frame is constructed from custom shaped triple butted 7005 aluminium and is designed specifically for disc brakes. It’ll be available in a painted or anodised finish, and features a tapered head tube, internal cable routing and a pressfit 86 bottom bracket. Claimed frame weight is about 1,350g for medium. The Pilgrims also has space for up to 35mm tyres, or 32mm with mudguards.

We’re on the cusp of a disc brake revolution in road cycling at the moment. Bikes with disc brakes have steadily been appearing on the market for the last few years, and rather than a trend being led by the big bicycle corporations, some of the smaller UK outfits have recognised changing riding styles and habits and seized the initiative. The likes of Genesis, Donhou, Mason and Bowman are arguably at the forefront of delivering the sort of bicycles that many cyclists are looking for today.

 2015's hottest disc-equipped road bikes - Disc brake road bike revolution rolls on with Specialized, Trek, Giant, Cannondale, Scott, Genesis, Saracen, Felt and more

Disc brake road bike revolution rolls on with Specialized, Trek, Giant, Cannondale, Scott, Genesis, Saracen, Felt and many more brands

What sort of bicycle are they looking for? Well they want disc brakes for a start; increased control, low maintenance, improved stopping power in all weathers. Then there’s the increased tyre clearance - made easier by the absence of tyre width restricting calipers - so you have a wider scope of tyre choice, from traditional narrow 23mm rubber right up to wide treaded, almost cyclo-cross, tyres.

The choice of tyre simply depends on the sort of riding you want to do and how adventurous you are to include sections of trail and woodland into your regular rides. Lastly, there’s the ability to fit mudguards, providing that year-round one-bike-to-do-everything-on that many cyclists increasingly desire. For many, it’s a clear reaction to manufacturers that are constantly increasing the diversity and the specific purpose of road bikes.

“The disc braked road bike is still a relatively new idea but one we feel has its place,” says Bowman. “That place isn’t currently on the race circuit, rather it is somewhere that allows the benefits of all condition braking reliability come to the fore: on a road less travelled. For the more adventurous cycling soul, there is often a point (or many) on a ride where small tracks, trails and rough roads are passed and you are left wondering, “where does that go?”. If you’re riding a bike like the Pilgrims, you no longer have to wonder.

The option to run a wider selection of tyres adds an interesting and intriguing versatility to the Pilgrims that opens up your riding choices. Why stick to the road when you can mix it up with some bridleway, canal towpath or riding over the downs? It’s a trend, of adding off-road terrain into otherwise mainly road rides, that has gained a lot of popularity in the US. Bowman are calling this style of riding, which mixes tarmac and dirt, road-plus.

There are key difference in the geometry compared to the Palace, a frame designed for racing and aggressive riding. The wheelbase is a smidgen longer, the top tube a hair shorter, and the bottom bracket is lower. The down tube is massively oversized and the head tube is tapered. The seat tube is tapered too, bulging out in diameter as it closes in on the bottom bracket shell, and narrows towards the top tube, where it accepts a 27.2mm seatpost. Changes to the final production frames will include a cover plug for the Di2 port on the seat tube, and the welds will be smooth, just like on the Palace.

Cable routing is fully internal with modular inserts, so it’s compatible with mechanical and electronic groupsets. Full-length outer casing is used, ensuring the cable is fully sealed from the elements. The cable routing has been carefully thought out, in particular the manner in which the cables exit the bottom of the down tube.

Here, Bowman uses a cable guide that bolts into the bottom bracket shell and helps guide the cables to their respective destinations. Then there’s the chainstay bridge, which as well as serving to stiffen the rear stays, also acts as a location for two cable guides to bolt into. The bolted cable and hose guides are a nicer approach than the zip ties we’ve seen many manufacturers employ, and are easily removeable.

There’s space for mudguards, and Bowman has considered this. The rear dropouts feature hidden mudguard eyelets, and they’re in the final stages of producing a custom 3D printed mudguard bracket that will fit onto the seat stays and simply clip into place, and be easily removeable. For the fork there will be a similar solution, as there’s no integrated eyelets on the carbon fork yet. There are currently very few options for a fork that accepts disc brakes and mudguards and has clearance for big tyres with a shorter axle-to-crown height than a cyclocross fork, but Bowman are working on a solution.

What’s it like to ride?

“Ride with Spirit” it proudly says on the top tube and seat stays. From even this one ride, certainly not long and varied enough to draw a conclusive verdict, it’s clear that is the case, as Bowman has got one thing very right: the handling. The longer wheelbase gives the Pilgrims a good stance on the road, or dirt, and the steering is fantastically direct. It’s a very involving and exciting ride.

And it’s fast. There’s a real snap to the way it accelerates and the responses are immediate. It buzzes along the road with pace easily achieved, the frame displaying abundant stiffness to turn your energy into forward momentum with great efficiency. Pedalling out of the saddle and pushing hard on the handlebars shows there’s no detectable twist or squirm through the frame and fork.

The aluminium frame stops short of being harsh. Aluminium frames are much crisper in comparison to a good carbon fibre frame, but advances in manufacturing have narrowed the gap. Today aluminium frames are exceedingly good. It’s firm and direct, the carbon fibre fork is a good companion to the frame, and there’s plenty of feedback through the tyres and contact points. But yet it’s composed enough to settle into a comfortable canter on the road, buzzing along at 30kph quite happily, but show it a bit more energy and it flicks into life and darts from corner to apex with fizzy excitement.

The geometry works. It’s great on the road, where it simply feels like a very good road bike, of a similar endurance mould to the Cannondale Synapse or Canyon Endurace. A good length provides a comfortable fit, and the head tube isn’t massively tall. Take it away from the road and into the woods, and it pops and boosts along the trail with the capability of a lightweight 29er mountain bike. The quick steering at the hydraulic disc brakes allow plenty of fine control. The Pilgrims crosses ground, whether road or dirt, with surprising speed and ability.

Obviously one ride isn’t enough to pass full judgement, we’ll have to wait until we get a frame in for a full review to really put it through its paces. Still, it’s clear Bowman has succeeded in creating a very capable disc road bike with the versatility to be a pure road bike, or one that, with careful tyre choice, could be used for more adventurous riding. It’s light, fast and responsive, and just like the Palace, it’s keenly priced.

The Pilgrims is currently available at a special pre-order price of £675 until Monday 18th May, with a week for delivery. Full stock will be arriving in just over a month when the frames will retail for the full price of £750. Bowman don’t do complete builds but they do have a growing network of dealers that’ll happily do a full build for you.

http://bowman-cycles.com

David worked on the road.cc tech team from 2012-2020. Previously he was editor of Bikemagic.com and before that staff writer at RCUK. He's a seasoned cyclist of all disciplines, from road to mountain biking, touring to cyclo-cross, he only wishes he had time to ride them all. He's mildly competitive, though he'll never admit it, and is a frequent road racer but is too lazy to do really well. He currently resides in the Cotswolds, and you can now find him over on his own YouTube channel David Arthur - Just Ride Bikes

Add new comment

19 comments

Avatar
Jonny_Trousers | 8 years ago
0 likes

I must try an aluminium framed bike again. I thought I was put off for life having owned a Pearson Touché, but I'm reading lots of positive reviews these days.

Avatar
RicotheCloak | 8 years ago
0 likes

A great looking bike that certainly interests me. I do find the frequent comments about cross bikes being sluggish on the road a bit perplexing though. I have one bike at the moment, a 2009 Felt F1X. I do everything on it, 100 mile sportives, farm tracks and dirt roads, fast (for me) 50ish mile road rides with a few friends on their carbon road bikes who I keep up with just fine. This is with Shimano RS30 wheels and 28 mm Conti 4seasons inflated to 75psi. (Gives a nice cushioned ride and still rolls really well). For the really rough stuff I put on the original cxp22 's with 35 cross tyres and handles very rough tracks just fine. I suppose my point is would I really notice a massive difference by getting a 'proper' road bike? I am looking for an n+1 at the moment and this bike ticks a lot if boxes for me but I would be interested to hear others thoughts as to what I've been missing.

Avatar
Neil @ Bowman replied to RicotheCloak | 8 years ago
0 likes

RicotheCloak,
When we talk about crossers being sluggish on the road, its not to do with how they accelerate, as - as you rightly point out - with light wheels and decent tyres they are just fine at gaining speed. It is more to do with how they respond to body english and rider input in handling terms.
A good road bike will allow for small inputs to make a large difference. Thats to say, mid corner small hip movements or upper body movements affect the way the bike behaves. By their nature (or geometry) a cross bike is more stable. As such it takes a larger amount of input to get the change in line.

Would you notice the difference? It is noticeable to many but, whether its a big enough difference for N + 1, well......

hope that adds a bit of insight anyway.

Avatar
Stef Marazzi | 8 years ago
0 likes

This is the bike a lot of people are waiting for!

Avatar
Notsofast | 8 years ago
0 likes

This has got audax written all over it, love it.

Avatar
joemmo | 8 years ago
0 likes

Great response, thanks Neil. Don't get me wrong, I think this is cracking looking bike and you are right that I'm looking at it from a cross bike angle.

maybe I'm cynical but I do think some people tend to bandy around terms like 'heavy' and 'sluggish' and 'harsh' (or my favourite: 'MASSIVE 28mm TYRES') when talking about something describing bikes and their characteristics, often as if they are like the difference between night and day whereas actually they can be quite insignificant. We all like to convince ourselves of the need for the N+1 though  1

Avatar
Neil @ Bowman replied to joemmo | 8 years ago
0 likes

N + 1?

why limit yourself so?

And thanks, how a bike looks is very important, i think we should all be more honest with ourselves, is a huge part of the decision making process......

and finally:
"as if they are like the difference between night and day whereas actually they can be quite insignificant"
when its going well, the differences are often small, when it goes wrong on a loose surface though, the geometry makes for a far easier 'save'.

Avatar
David Arthur @d... | 8 years ago
0 likes

Good question joemma and joules1975 beat me to it with a spot on reply.

It’s basically down to how much off-road riding you want to be able to do, and the type of trail you’re riding on. The Pilgrims is predominantly designed as a road bike, but won’t be phased if you show it some dirt occasionally during a ride because, as joulse1975 points out, it’s impressive what a 30mm tyre will cope with. That’s why road-plus sort of sums it up quite well, it’s road cycling plus a bit of off-road.

Avatar
tom_w | 8 years ago
0 likes

However, this bike with a bit more clearance would do everything. OK not CX as well as a custom CX bike, but for those who want winter bike, exploring bike, bridleway bike, cx bike in that order a bit more clearance would be a boon.

Avatar
David Arthur @d... replied to tom_w | 8 years ago
0 likes
tom_w wrote:

However, this bike with a bit more clearance would do everything. OK not CX as well as a custom CX bike, but for those who want winter bike, exploring bike, bridleway bike, cx bike in that order a bit more clearance would be a boon.

Sounds like you need a cyclocross bike with mudguard mounts to me

Avatar
joemmo | 8 years ago
0 likes

Very much up my potholed, muddy street this but I have one problem with it and that is tyre clearance.

If you are looking for a bike that is pitched at being multi-surface and presumably sturdy enough for some rough stuff, why would you choose this over a cyclocross / gravel type frame with adequate clearance for fat knobbly tyres AND mud? Is the relatively subtle effect of a slightly shorter wheelbase, steeper angles or whatever enough to offset that compromise?

It just looks like its trying to occupy a small niche between road and cross but cutting down the options for the sake of some marginal gains in handling and aesthetics. I'd be interested to hear Bowman's thinking behind it

Avatar
joules1975 replied to joemmo | 8 years ago
0 likes
joemmo wrote:

Very much up my potholed, muddy street this but I have one problem with it and that is tyre clearance.

If you are looking for a bike that is pitched at being multi-surface and presumably sturdy enough for some rough stuff, why would you choose this over a cyclocross / gravel type frame with adequate clearance for fat knobbly tyres AND mud? Is the relatively subtle effect of a slightly shorter wheelbase, steeper angles or whatever enough to offset that compromise?

Because a cross bike is heavier and pretty sluggish on the road compared to a road bike, and it's amazing what a road bike with even slightly bigger tyres can cope with - Paris-Roubaix, being the prime example.

I'd happily own a bike that can take 30mm tyres to ride predominantly road but that will cope with (OK, not quite MTB cope with but cope with) gravel shortcuts - in fact that's exactly what I ride.

Disc brakes and tubeless tyres mean I don't have to worry about pinch flatting or dinging/slightly buckling the rim, which is also handy for pot-holes and cattle grids.

Avatar
Neil @ Bowman replied to joemmo | 8 years ago
0 likes

Hi Joemmo,

thanks for the queries, hopefully i can explain the thinking behind the decisions that resulted in the Pilgrims:
"If you are looking for a bike that is pitched at being multi-surface and presumably sturdy enough for some rough stuff, why would you choose this over a cyclocross / gravel type frame with adequate clearance for fat knobbly tyres AND mud?"

You'd chose this if you wanted a road bike that could do a bit more than normal. But still handle road riding - very well. We've come back from two separate week long trips in Mallorca testing the Pilgrims, and it was as much fun as the Palace on the great surfaces, and right at home in big group rides. In our experience, a real criss bike doesn't cut it for serious road riding. The extra clearance and versatility did let us do some exploring on gravel paths and through the nature reserve behind Alcudia.

"Is the relatively subtle effect of a slightly shorter wheelbase, steeper angles or whatever enough to offset that compromise?"
that is a personal preference. If you primarily ride on the road, and want a bike that is in no way out of place, then the 'compromise' is offset. To get the clearance, you would need a 25-30mm longer fork. You could design road handling around this extra length, but the compromise would be huge everywhere else.

"t just looks like its trying to occupy a small niche between road and cross but cutting down the options for the sake of some marginal gains in handling and aesthetics"
Cutting down marginal gains is looking at the Pilgrims from a cross focus. Look at it from a road focus, and you get extra, not compromises. The Pilgrims was designed as a bike I personally, and lots of people i ride with, wanted. a road bike, that could do a bit more - hence the evolution of the Road-Plus term. It summed up what we wanted. Road riding, plus a bit.

If you want something with the clearance to allow for some off road focussed adventure, then the Foots Cray, which we'll be launching later in the year, would be the thing. It just wont be as much fn to ride on the road.

The road focus also means it makes a great winter bike. Cross bikes can, but its a lot harder to replicate your road riding position and have a bike that handles nicely. In the winter, having a bike you actually enjoy riding is one less impediment.

"I'd be interested to hear Bowman's thinking behind it"
Hope that helps....
Neil

Avatar
Bez | 8 years ago
0 likes

Ta. Just happened to find it via Google: their front page didn't seem to link to it.

Longest available top tube is a whacking great 30mm shorter than the minimum I could live with, so that's out then!

Avatar
Neil @ Bowman replied to Bez | 8 years ago
0 likes

Hi Bez,

How tall are you?
the top tube on a 58 is 575mm, Are you saying you need a 605 effective top tube?
 13

FYI, the link from the home page is on the Frames tab, pull down and Pilgrims should become available.

Avatar
Chris James replied to Neil @ Bowman | 8 years ago
0 likes
Neil @ Bowman wrote:

Hi Bez,

How tall are you?
the top tube on a 58 is 575mm, Are you saying you need a 605 effective top tube?

Funnily enough, I was going to write those exact words to Bez!

I think it looks a nice bike, but I wonder about how practical it is trying to over off all bases. For example, I like my road bike's handling on road, and my cross bike on gravel etc. But I run my road bike at 100 psi and the cross bike at around 40 (lower for racing). A 30mm slick at 80 psi or so for everything wouldn't really cut it for me, I would feel like I was giving away speed on the roads and losing my fillings off road.

I've done MTB routes on 25mm slicks on my winter bike before (!) but I wouldn't recommend it.

On the other hand, as a sort of café racer then I can see the point of it.

Avatar
Neil @ Bowman replied to Chris James | 8 years ago
0 likes

Chris,
and that right there is why cycling is great,
its big enough that we can all get something different out of it.

Vive la difference!

Avatar
Bez | 8 years ago
0 likes

Oh, hello, this is ticking all the boxes. Any word on a geometry sheet?

Avatar
David Arthur @d... replied to Bez | 8 years ago
0 likes
Bez wrote:

Oh, hello, this is ticking all the boxes. Any word on a geometry sheet?

Geometry chart on the website here Bez http://bowman-cycles.com/pilgrims/

Latest Comments