Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Chris Froome defends his use of Therapeautic Use Exemptions after records leaked

Russian hackers reveal records of athletes including Froome and Sir Bradley WIggins

Tour de France champion Chris Froome has defended his use of Therapeutic Use Exemptions following the release of medical data by Russian hackers who managed to access the World Anti-Doping Agency’s database.

Froome is one of five Team GB athletes from the Rio Olympics whose medical records have been by the Fancy Bears hacking group, with his former Team Sky colleague and fellow Tour de France winner Sir Bradley Wiggins among the others.

> Russian hackers publish Wiggins and Froome medical files

So far, the hackers, who accessed WADA’s database with an International Olympic Committee- accredited login, have published data relating to 29 athletes who competed at Rio including tennis stars Venus and Serena Williams and the American gymnast Simone Biles.

In a statement reported on Yahoo Sports, Froome said: "I've openly discussed my TUEs with the media and have no issues with the leak which confirms my statements.”

According to the data published by the hackers, Froome received TUEs for the drug prednisolone, used to treat various inflammatory and autoimmune conditions including acute asthma attacks, at the 2013 Critérium du Dauphiné and the following year’s Tour de Romandie.

Froome added: "In nine years as a professional I've twice required a TUE for exacerbated asthma, the last time was in 2014."

Team Sky, in a statement reported by BBC Sport, said any applications for TUEs by it were have "all been managed and recorded in line with the processes put in place by the governing bodies."

Meanwhile, British Cycling (BC) said that "as the national governing body for the sport in Britain and a supporter of the Wada code, we condemn the publication of any individual's medical information without their permission."

A statement issued on behalf of Wiggins said: "There's nothing new here. Everyone knows Brad suffers from asthma; his medical treatment is BC and UCI approved and like all Team GB athletes he follows WADA regulations to the letter."

"The leak of theses records is an attempt to undermine the credibility of WADA and that's something for them to deal with."

Besides Froome and Wiggins, the other British athletes whose details have been published are rugby sevens player Heather Fisher, golfer Charley Hull and rower Sam Townsend.

UK Anti-Doping (UKAD) emphasised that TUEs were given only based on “medical need” and were “not an indication of doping.”

Referring to the data leak, the agency said it “strongly condemns actions of this nature and we are appalled that five members of Team GB have had their private data published illegally online.

"Not only does it undermine our work and the protection of clean sport, but it is grossly unfair to the athletes, whose personal data has been put at risk.

"It is important to note that in the UK, applications for Therapeutic Use Exemptions, TUEs, are subject to a strict and independent process,” UKAD continued.

“Applications submitted to UKAD are assessed by at least three independent medics and are then referred to WADA, which has further independent oversight of applications.

"This robust process is in place to ensure that TUEs are granted based solely on medical need – they are not an indication of doping.

"They are there to support the clean athlete's right to compete, despite a medical condition," it added.

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

14 comments

Avatar
stephen connor | 7 years ago
0 likes

The real issue here is that the team organisation, team Sky in this case but you can be fairly confident that other teams are in the same situation, and medical staff around the riders are jumping for the stongest medication, that also offers possible perfermance gains, when these medical conditions arise.
The riders' aren't qualified to say can you not treat me with drug A, a weeaker but effective option, instead of drug B because drug A would get the job done and drug B is the nuclear option which may raise doping suspiscion.
Having read comments from doctors about this, it looks as if Team Sky at best flouted if not ignored medical guidlines laid down by specislist medical organisations on the use of these drugs to treat theese conditions which seems to recommned use of steroids in severe cases only. Now if the medical case is severe then rider is not medically fit to race and should be pulled from the race
Its clear that the TUE system is too easy to manipulate and circumvent for marginal gains.

Avatar
barongreenback | 7 years ago
0 likes

Doesn't matter whether they were following the rules, it's enough innuendo to create a fuss, which is the desire of the hackers (or their alleged) state sponsors.

All of a sudden, it appears as if an unusually large proportion of professional cyclists suffer from respitory disease and allergies.  Damage successfully done, regardless of the denials.

 

Avatar
MattieKempy | 7 years ago
1 like

Is this really news? A better headline for the whole affair would be something like "Nothing To See Here: Rider Follows Rules."

Avatar
SNS1938 | 7 years ago
1 like

''Chris Froome defends his use of Therapeautic Use Exemptions after records leaked'' ... 

What else would he do? He's hardly going to come out and say that he shouldnt have been granted the TUE and should be banned. No story here.

 

Avatar
EddyBerckx replied to SNS1938 | 7 years ago
3 likes

SNS1938 wrote:

''Chris Froome defends his use of Therapeautic Use Exemptions after records leaked'' ... 

What else would he do? He's hardly going to come out and say that he shouldnt have been granted the TUE and should be banned. No story here.

 

 

to be fair he's always been upfront about them...not sure there's anything to see here?

Avatar
muffies | 7 years ago
0 likes

Well are any of these drugs giving them an unfair advantage?
If yes i dont see why its defended.
If no i dont see why hackers published it.

Avatar
Carton replied to muffies | 7 years ago
0 likes

muffies wrote:

Well are any of these drugs giving them an unfair advantage? If yes i dont see why its defended. If no i dont see why hackers published it.

Maybe. Probably not, but not to the extent that it can be ruled out. Do with that what you will.

Avatar
Butty replied to muffies | 7 years ago
0 likes

muffies wrote:

Well are any of these drugs giving them an unfair advantage? If yes i dont see why its defended. If no i dont see why hackers published it.

 

It was published to make the Russian drug culture appear not so bad at all.

Avatar
DaveE128 replied to Butty | 7 years ago
0 likes

Butty wrote:

muffies wrote:

Well are any of these drugs giving them an unfair advantage? If yes i dont see why its defended. If no i dont see why hackers published it.

 

It was published to make the Russian drug culture appear not so bad at all.

Indeed, and it's telling that it includes no information that wasn't already public for Froome or Wiggins!

It would seem to me that the Russians are clutching at straws somewhat.

Would I be right to understand that Froome is saying his last TUE was in 2014? Or was that just for one particular drug? If so, I think that says a lot as he's done ok since then!  3

Avatar
themartincox | 7 years ago
2 likes

"and like all Team GB athletes he follows WADA regulations to the lette".

well not quite all..... *cough Lizzie

Avatar
Grizzerly replied to themartincox | 7 years ago
3 likes

themartincox wrote:

"and like all Team GB athletes he follows WADA regulations to the lette".

well not quite all..... *cough Lizzie

 

 

Actually,  the WADA regulations allow for an appeal to CAS.

 

Not quite all commenters understand the system it would seem. 

Avatar
Yorkshire wallet | 7 years ago
1 like

Kimmage will be loving this.

Avatar
tritecommentbot | 7 years ago
1 like

Yeah that's the thing about this hack. As much as I like having data out in the open, you're going to get loons who'll use it to spam the riders abuse on social media and at the races. Plainly just because they dont like that particular rider.

 

We need these guys to focus on the race, get even stronger, stay motivated. Last thing we need are a bunch of coy riders, worried about the fans and scared to put in a sensational performance. 

 

 

Avatar
Yorkshire wallet | 7 years ago
1 like

The French will be back to throwing things at him again next year.

Latest Comments