Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Council warned that removing key cycle lane would be “real PR risk” – but pressed ahead anyway

Plans to remove the bike lane on Bristol’s Whiteladies Road – which the council claimed caused flooding – were scrapped in October amid widespread opposition

Councillors in Bristol were warned that controversial plans to scrap a key cycle lane in the city – which the council claimed would help alleviate the risk of flooding on the road – would prove hugely unpopular and a potential “real PR risk”, but decided to press ahead with the scheme anyway.

Whiteladies Road, a key approach to Bristol city centre from the north west with a much-used cycle lane, regularly floods when there is rain due to water running downhill from adjacent roads that have blocked drains. Water levels of up to 18 inches caused by the blocked drains have made conditions hazardous for cyclists and motorists, as well as pedestrians.

In May 2022, we reported that Bristol City Council was consulting on whether to tackle the risk of flash floods by installing grass verges to soak up rainwater, as well as a drainage channel, through widening the footway on either side of the road.

> Key Bristol cycle lane to be scrapped – because council claims it causes flooding 

This plan, however, was widely criticised by local cyclists and environmental and active travel campaigners, who pointed out that the scheme meant that there would no longer be space for the cycle lanes running in each direction.

Councillor Don Alexander, who holds the transport portfolio at the Labour-controlled council, said at the time that removing the cycle lanes was “a last resort… but the lack of space in this area means we need to consider it.”

Vassili Papastavrou, secretary of the Bristol Tree Forum who raised concerns over the potential scrapping of the cycle lane on Whiteladies Road in a lengthy thread on Twitter, told that he had “never heard of a cycle lane causing flooding before,” and suggested that “it might be a world first.”

The scheme sparked widespread condemnation from cycling campaigners and other councillors – including the Green Party’s Emma Edwards, who first raised the issues with drainage at the end of 2021 – and a public consultation involving over 1,000 residents found that 94 percent were opposed to the cycle lane’s removal.

Following that overwhelming response opposing the scheme, the council decided to drop the plans in October.

> “Crazy” plans to scrap key cycle lane – because of flash floods – shelved by council 

Now, documents unearthed by a Freedom of Information request from Mr Papastravrou show that the council was warned of the potential for such a backlash by internal advisors, but pushed ahead with the scheme anyway.

According to the documents, while members of the local authority’s various departments noted that the plans were “really not ideal” as the route is “busy and with vocal users”, Labour councillor Alexander said that he was “happy to remove the cycle lane” and that he would try to “warm up” his cycling team to the idea.

As part of the council’s quality assurance process, which took place in 2021, months before the plan to scrap the bike lanes was announced, a traffic signal officer said: “Our preference would be to retain as much cycle provision as possible, only because we have just installed the first early-release traffic signals for cyclists in the city at the next junction down, at Triangle West, so it may look potentially contradictory if in the next breath we take cycling provision away here.”

“I think the public pressure to install more cycle routes will increase, and removing it — especially here, which is busy and with vocal users — will be a real PR risk to the authority,” a cycling officer added. “We have just consulted on the A37/A4018 project, where we stated we are improving pedestrian, cycle and bus routes.

“In a location like this, I don’t think we should be taking 2 to 3.8 metres out of use, as we need all the space we can get allocated to pedestrians and cycles, as this is one of the main corridors into the city from the north. I appreciate the issues here, but I think removing the cycle route and still only providing two metres for pedestrians is really not ideal.”

A transport minister also noted the importance of maintaining a key part of Bristol’s cycling network, saying: “It’s a vital bit of road for prioritising cycle infrastructure in the long term… Any scheme here, where we are replacing the road surface for the long term, should have integrated protected cycling provision as far as possible, or we are really missing an opportunity. These are the missing links we need to be filling in where possible to work towards a cohesive network.”

However, later that year another council officer noted that the lack of protection for cyclists on Whiteladies Road may afford the council the opportunity to remove the bike lane without too much fuss from cycling campaigners.

“The Bristol Cycle Campaign doesn’t like this type of cycle lane, so it may not be as much of a PR risk as thought… their call is for proper segregated routes,” the advisor said.

Alexander then replied that he “would have a chat with the cycling team at his meeting this afternoon, to warm them up”.

Responding to a question on social media concerning why the local authority chose to ignore the advice of several of its members – before eventually scrapping the controversial scheme a year later – the Labour councillor tweeted: “We spoke more with people and revised our plans accordingly. We do a lot of that.”

Ryan joined in December 2021 and since then has kept the site’s readers and listeners informed and enthralled (well at least occasionally) on news, the live blog, and the Podcast. After boarding a wrong bus at the world championships and ruining a good pair of jeans at the cyclocross, he now serves as’s senior news writer. Before his foray into cycling journalism, he wallowed in the equally pitiless world of academia, where he wrote a book about Victorian politics and droned on about cycling and bikes to classes of bored students (while taking every chance he could get to talk about cycling in print or on the radio). He can be found riding his bike very slowly around the narrow, scenic country lanes of Co. Down.

Add new comment


Broken_Chain | 10 months ago

More under used and badly planned cycle lanes need to be removed.

hawkinspeter replied to Broken_Chain | 10 months ago
1 like
Broken_Chain wrote:

GOOD. More under used and badly planned cycle lanes need to be removed.

Under used? You must be thinking of some other cycle lane.

I'd prefer that lane to be properly segregated as it's just using magic paint, but they'd have to take into account the tree roots at one end. It's a useful route, so I don't think it's badly planned, but removing it would be a backwards step.

eburtthebike | 1 year ago

Councillor Don Alexander, who holds the transport portfolio at the Labour-controlled council.....


Labour councillor Alexander said that he was “happy to remove the cycle lane” and that he would try to “warm up” his cycling team to the idea.

Resign.  Resign now.  Do not pass go, do not collect £200, just fuck off you incompetent twit.

That was about as polite as I could be under the circumstances.  How can somene so short sighted and out of touch, so utterly lacking in understanding of his responsibilities, so completely failing to comprehend the fundamental principles of his job, be appointed to such a position?


OnYerBike | 1 year ago

"Plans to remove the bike lane on Bristol’s Whiteladies Road – which the council claimed caused flooding – were scrapped in October amid widespread opposition"

No, they didn't - and not the first time has repeated this misinformation. The council's proposed scheme to alleviate flooding involved scrapping the bike lane (as part of a reduction in carriageway width), but they never claimed the bike lane was "causing" the flooding.  

brooksby replied to OnYerBike | 1 year ago

They said that the tarmaccing over of all of the front gardens to make car parking along there had worked together with tree roots damaging the surface water drainage system to overload the local drains.

And that therefore the best thing to do was to put in much wider grass verges to allow for surface drainage into the ground rather than the drains.

But that to do so, without narrowing the roadway (God forbid!! <clutches pearls>), they would have to remove the cycle lanes.

(The actions of private landowners overwhelm the public drainage system, so the public purse has to pay to solve the problem...).

Bmblbzzz replied to brooksby | 1 year ago

But the cycle lane there is part of the roadway! A part that's quite difficult to use because of all the tree roots... 

brooksby replied to Bmblbzzz | 1 year ago

But clearly not part of the 'real' road, in the mind of the city's transport commissioner...

ktache replied to brooksby | 1 year ago
1 like

Grass on dirt is not always great for drainage. I'm sure over the next couple of days there will be many pictures of flooded football pitches on local news.

There are possible engineering solutions. On my commute there is a bit where obviously after quite a bit of flooding, they have dispensed with normal drain covers and have a inside of a curve with lots of kerbs with holes in them.

Latest Comments