Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Scrapped funding puts the future of 1,000 bike hangars in doubt

Changes in the UK Government has put a pause on Bristol Council’s plans for new secure bike hangars

Bristol’s Zero Emission Transport City project has been “curtailed” after the new UK Conservative leadership scrapped funding, meaning the council is now in the dark over the future of the planned 1,000 new safe bike hangars, along with 250 electric buses.

Last summer, Bristol City Council was given £500,000 by the Department for Transport for planning a programme to decarbonise the city’s transport network, which accounts for a third of Bristol’s carbon emissions.

This would have been a part of Bristol’s Zero Emission Transport City project aiming to get the city to net zero carbon emissions by 2030 to tackle climate change. According to the plan, 1,000 new bike hangars were going to be installed, along with establishing greener last mile delivery services and rolling out 250 electric buses.

This programme would then be used to apply for much more government funding, to actually put the plans into practice. However, Bristol Live reports that after the resignation of two prime ministers last autumn, changes in the government now mean the Zero Emission Transport City project will no longer be funded.

Transport emissions in Bristol have reduced by less than 10% over the past decade, much slower than other sectors like industry, commercial and domestic energy use. In 2019, 494,100 tonnes of carbon dioxide were emitted from Bristol’s transport network.

The plan would have seen the council setting up safe and secure places for people to store cycles, along with creating a ‘zero emission zone’ in the city centre, covering the Old City, Broadmead and Queen Square. There were also plans for freight consolidation hubs, with the last mile of deliveries made on cargo bikes or small electric van

> Cyclists take over Bristol for "mind-blowing" Drum & Bass on the Bike ride

The Bristol City Council has now announced that the UK Government has backtracked on its promise of funding. The councillors on the Growth and Regeneration Scrutiny Commission were updated about this development on March 22, almost a year after the initial funding.

> Residents “threatened with police” after “surrounding” contractors installing bike hangar

Speaking to the commission, Pete Woodhouse, Transport Strategy Manager, said that the council staff were unsure how they could spend the leftover money.

He said: “This was a government scheme that we engaged with and were awarded £500,000 to work up a feasibility programme for a bid to develop a number of things to promote zero emissions. This would have included things like enhancing the bus fleet to zero emissions, and creating a zero emissions zone around the Old City.

“Unfortunately, the programme will now not be funded due to changes in government. We’re awaiting a bit of clarity on what the funding remaining from that £500,000 can be used for. This is unfortunately on pause until further funding from the government can be brought forward. So there was a big promise with this, and unfortunately that’s been curtailed.”

This comes as a huge blow for the city’s ambition of becoming more bike-friendly by providing secure storage locations for cyclists, when a week ago, almost a thousand cyclists took over Bristol in a “mind-blowing” and “crazy” Drum and Bass on the Bike ride hosted by DJ Dom Whiting.

Adwitiya joined road.cc in 2023 as a news writer after graduating with a masters in journalism from Cardiff University. His dissertation focused on active travel, which soon threw him into the deep end of covering everything related to the two-wheeled tool, and now cycling is as big a part of his life as guitars and football. He has previously covered local and national politics for Voice Wales, and also likes to writes about science, tech and the environment, if he can find the time. Living right next to the Taff trail in the Welsh capital, you can find him trying to tackle the brutal climbs in the valleys.

Add new comment

13 comments

Avatar
IanMK | 1 year ago
0 likes

Wrong thread

Avatar
HarrogateSpa | 1 year ago
6 likes

It is jaw-droppingly irresponsible to drop plans to cut greenhouse gases from transport.

We urgently need to get rid of this government, so that a new one can work in the public interest on the problems that need to be solved in the 2020s.

Avatar
Secret_squirrel | 1 year ago
1 like

Playing devils advocate for a sec.... it doesnt seem like the additional cash was ever definately in the bag....but dependent on the initial £0.5m "feasability study".

Avatar
Awavey replied to Secret_squirrel | 1 year ago
1 like

I spotted that too, maybe we should be asking how you can spend almost 500k on a feasibility study ?

I also spotted both Norwich & Oxford each received 500k to carry out similar feasibility studies. Both Norwich & Oxford have subsequently received substantial backing from the DfTs (ZEBRA fund), 11million in the case of Norwich, to convert their bus fleets to electric buses.

Avatar
BIRMINGHAMisaDUMP | 1 year ago
2 likes

Bristol could have applied for some of this: 

Under the CEF Transport programme for the period 2021-2027, EUR 25.8 billion are available for grants to co-fund TEN-T projects in the EU Member States. Since 2014, CEF has supported over 1,200 projects for a total amount of almost EUR 29 billion in the transport sector. 
 

 

Avatar
Browsie | 1 year ago
4 likes

So let's get this right, we are all expected to dump our perfectly good ice vehicles and buy an expensive electric vehicle in the next few years , then dump our gas boilers and buy an expensive heat pump instead while at the same time our wonderful government is withdrawing active travel funding , that's not really a good look in my opinion !

Avatar
Jetmans Dad replied to Browsie | 1 year ago
2 likes
Browsie wrote:

So let's get this right, we are all expected to dump our perfectly good ice vehicles and buy an expensive electric vehicle in the next few years ...

No, you are not. 

The ability/option to buy NEW ICE vehicles will be removed in a few years, but they will still be available to buy and use second hand for some time after that. Feel free to drive your ICE car until it dies of old age if you want to. 

As electric vehicles become more widespread they should also become cheaprer, but ...

... the issue, as it  has always been, is how do you create enough public charging infrastructure to make electric cars as usable as ICE vehicles are at the moment? I, for one, live in a pre-car era residential city street with no off-road parking and no easy way to charge a vehicle at home (particularly as I can rarely actually park outside my house). 

Avatar
Hirsute replied to Browsie | 1 year ago
0 likes

The gas boiler applies to new build - there might be a change required for 2035 whereby no gas replacement is allowed.

Avatar
espressodan | 1 year ago
6 likes

To be honest, another £500000 spent on a study just represents £500000 lining the pockets of consultancies who are going to be spectacularly unsuccessful at defining requirements for good active travel infrastructure.

Avatar
levestane | 1 year ago
3 likes

'Zero emission' seems quite challenging. To date there is no sign of any reduction in d[CO2]/dt let alone all the other waste products.

Maybe this article needs an 'environment' tag?

Avatar
eburtthebike | 1 year ago
11 likes

Perhaps the government could cancel a few road schemes to fund this?  Or at least make a few speeches about how important cutting carbon is: that'll help.

That's a point, my delightful MP, the minister for transport himself, hasn't responded to my complaint about funding for Active Travel being cut.  I feel a slightly aggressive email coming on: not very passive.

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to eburtthebike | 1 year ago
8 likes
eburtthebike wrote:

Perhaps the government could cancel a few road schemes to fund this?  Or at least make a few speeches about how important cutting carbon is: that'll help.

But but I thought all the main parties (apologies - not current on Green policies) agreed that driving was part of the engine that fuels the economy?

Doesn't this mean we should be patriotically driving our way out of our issues like problems filling poholes, congestion and indeed global warming?  If motorists are cash cows that should help get the government out of debt at the very least, right?

Avatar
eburtthebike replied to chrisonabike | 1 year ago
7 likes
chrisonatrike wrote:

But but I thought all the main parties (apologies - not current on Green policies) agreed that driving was part of the engine that fuels the economy?

Doesn't this mean we should be patriotically driving our way out of our issues like problems filling poholes, congestion and indeed global warming?  If motorists are cash cows that should help get the government out of debt at the very least, right?

There's a flaw in that somewhere, I just can't put my finger on it.

Latest Comments