Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Near Miss of the Day 821: Close pass driver fined for careless driving – but should the charge have been dangerous driving?

Our regular series featuring close passes from around the country - today it's Avon & Somerset...

A cyclist who got a close pass at speed from a driver says he is “happy” with the outcome after police investigated the incident, with the motorist having fined almost £400 after admitting driving without due care and attention – although some people commenting on social media have wondered why he was not charged with the more serious offence of dangerous driving.

The incident happened last November with road.cc reader Guy being the cyclist on the receiving end, and Avon & Somerset Police tweeted the outcome of the case, which saw the driver fined £384, ordered to pay £110 costs and a £34 victim surcharge, as well as having their driving licence endorsed with three penalty points after admitting driving without due care and attention.

Guy told us: “I do remember as I cycled up to the roundabout the card driver beeped his horn at me, so I was half-expecting something. I didn’t expect such an exceptionally close pass though.”

He continued: “What’s interesting from the Twitter thread is the views that the driver should have been charged with dangerous rather than careless driving.”

The latter is defined by law as being committed when the standard of driving “falls below the minimum standard expected of a competent and careful driver, and includes driving without reasonable consideration for other road users.”

Dangerous driving, meanwhile, is defined as being committed when the standard of driving “falls far below the minimum standard expected of a competent and careful driver, and includes behaviour that could potentially endanger yourself or other drivers.”

The Crown Prosecution Service makes its decision on which offence someone suspected to have committed a crime should be charged with on whether there is a reasonable prospect of conviction.

That is one reason why, particularly in driving cases, the lesser offence of careless driving is chosen, rather than the more serious one of dangerous driving – although as one commenter on the thread pointed out, that is largely the result of a legal process that is in urgent need of reform.

Guy himself added: “I’m happy with the outcome, enforcement is the biggest deterrent and I think Avon and Somerset Police are a leading constabulary in the fight against road danger.”

> Near Miss of the Day turns 100 - Why do we do the feature and what have we learnt from it?

Over the years road.cc has reported on literally hundreds of close passes and near misses involving badly driven vehicles from every corner of the country – so many, in fact, that we’ve decided to turn the phenomenon into a regular feature on the site. One day hopefully we will run out of close passes and near misses to report on, but until that happy day arrives, Near Miss of the Day will keep rolling on.

If you’ve caught on camera a close encounter of the uncomfortable kind with another road user that you’d like to share with the wider cycling community please send it to us at info [at] road.cc or send us a message via the road.cc Facebook page.

If the video is on YouTube, please send us a link, if not we can add any footage you supply to our YouTube channel as an unlisted video (so it won't show up on searches).

Please also let us know whether you contacted the police and if so what their reaction was, as well as the reaction of the vehicle operator if it was a bus, lorry or van with company markings etc.

> What to do if you capture a near miss or close pass (or worse) on camera while cycling

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

21 comments

Avatar
wtjs | 1 year ago
3 likes

Well done A&S Police! Any penalty is better than he would have received up here.

Avatar
Muddy Ford | 1 year ago
3 likes

The close pass was intended to cause the cyclist injury and the driver should have been prosecuted for attempted murder. Sure they would have had to climb back down to just dangerous driving but it would have shaken the driver up that it was a possibility he might have been imprisoned for being a c**t. That car is expensive and quite rare, I bet he'd hate it to get scratched or dented.  

Avatar
IanMSpencer replied to Muddy Ford | 1 year ago
3 likes

Interesting point that an assault includes creating the belief that you are going to be assaulted, physical contact is not a requirement.

Avatar
Muddy Ford replied to IanMSpencer | 1 year ago
2 likes

I do think that it would improve safety if a few drivers were taken down the path of being prosecuted for attempted murder where there is clear intent to scare the cyclist into falling off. This might make drivers stop dishing out punishment passes if there is a slim chance they may end up on an attempted murder charge. 

Avatar
hutchdaddy replied to Muddy Ford | 1 year ago
3 likes

Never mind the cost of the car or how uncommon it is. It's a f'kin worthless piece of scrap, as you can neither get a cycle in the back of it or mount a rack on the back. I doubt it's even got a CD player in it...

Avatar
panda | 1 year ago
12 likes

I wonder what the driver was compensating for?  Not just at the point of making the pass, but also at the point of choosing the vehicle.  

 

Avatar
HoarseMann | 1 year ago
12 likes

I would say that warrants more than 3 points. But at least some action has been taken by the police and this driver might think twice next time. 

Avatar
eburtthebike | 1 year ago
8 likes

Is there some reason why drivers cannot be both charged with dangerous and careless driving, leaving the court to decide which is most appropriate?

Avatar
IanMSpencer replied to eburtthebike | 1 year ago
5 likes

They can indeed charge dangerous driving and the courts can decide to return an alternative verdict. It is documented in the CPS charging guidance.

There is also a discussion of what constitutes dangerous driving, and the description there does cover it.

What we don't know from the article is what they were charged with as the prosecution will often take an admission of guilt for the lesser charge to avoid a trial. The sides are under an obligation to be efficient with the court's time, so there is pressure on the prosecution to settle.

Avatar
brooksby | 1 year ago
0 likes

Don't we get to see a video, Simon?

Avatar
Hirsute replied to brooksby | 1 year ago
5 likes

You have to look at twitter at the mo.

Very close and fast

Avatar
brooksby replied to Hirsute | 1 year ago
3 likes

Thanks, hirsute.

And yes, yes it was 

Avatar
IanMSpencer replied to brooksby | 1 year ago
3 likes

I wonder if there is rear footage around? It seems to me that the Audi driver decided that the cyclist was in his way and sounded his horn as a demand to pass, and the cyclist responded by a defensive primary road position. From the sound I wonder how much the car was hassling.

Leicester Police have asked for footage to progress an incident yesterday which I think was my closest pass, the person riding behind thought I'd been hit.

Avatar
nosferatu1001 replied to IanMSpencer | 1 year ago
4 likes

Nissan GTR 

Avatar
IanMSpencer replied to nosferatu1001 | 1 year ago
0 likes

It was too quick for me to recognise properly  3

Avatar
NOtotheEU replied to IanMSpencer | 1 year ago
7 likes
IanMSpencer wrote:

It was too quick for me to recognise properly  3

To be fair I always assume it'll be an Audi until I see otherwise.

Avatar
nosferatu1001 replied to IanMSpencer | 1 year ago
1 like
IanMSpencer wrote:

It was too quick for me to recognise properly  3

I was pretty sure of it to start, as you can see the distinctive side badge, and frame by frame gives the really distinctive rear light cluster 

Avatar
IanMSpencer replied to nosferatu1001 | 1 year ago
0 likes

Ah, but does driving a Datsun instead of an Audi make the driver more or less cupable? 

Avatar
hutchdaddy replied to IanMSpencer | 1 year ago
3 likes

The honking takes places as the cyclist is just leaving the first mini-roundabout, there is a very short piece if road between the two mini-roundabouts, there is a pedestrian refuge and each end of this section of road. Not a long enough strectch of road to overtake. Why is he honking? it's clearly aggressive and intimidating.
The driver starts overtaking as soon as the front of the car has passed the pedestrian refuge after the second mini-roundabout, on a hatched section of roadway. If this is a punishment pass the punishment can only be Cycling on the road, causing the driver to stop and give way on the roundabout, and being in front.
Pure danger.

Avatar
IanMSpencer replied to hutchdaddy | 1 year ago
4 likes

Unfortunately we know the likely reason for the horn - aggrieved that cyclists exist with perhaps a smattering of wondering why the cyclist didn't dismount and wave the poor fellow on his Merrie Waye in the manner of a poor serf in a1950s Robin Hood movie.

Avatar
Secret_squirrel replied to Hirsute | 1 year ago
3 likes
hirsute wrote:

You have to look at twitter at the mo.

Very close and fast

Fook yes.

Latest Comments