The terminally ill wife of a cyclist who was killed by a lorry driver – who claimed that he was blinded by the sun at the time of the fatal collision – says that she does not want to see the 27-year-old sent to prison, and called on motorists to pay more attention and take greater care around vulnerable road users.
HGV driver Douglas Ryder told police and witnesses that the sun was in his eyes when he hit leisure cyclist Michael Fleming in August 2022, though a subsequent investigation also found that Ryder was speeding prior to the collision and was in breach of regulations governing rest periods for lorry drivers.
He pleaded guilty to causing death by careless driving at Naas Circuit Court, the Sunday World reports.
Mr Fleming (above), a 63-year-old leisure cyclist, was enjoying a Saturday morning ride near Clane, Co Kildare on 20 August 2022, when he was struck by HGV driver Ryder, who was travelling in the same direction, at around 8.15am.
The force of the collision knocked Mr Fleming into a ditch, where other motorists attempted to assist him, as Mr Ryder and another road user called for an ambulance. Despite the efforts of police officers, paramedics, and doctors, Mr Fleming was pronounced dead at the scene. A post-mortem revealed that he died due to multiple traumatic injuries.
One witness at the scene told gardaí that Mr Ryder – a self-employed haulier since 2016 – had claimed that the sun was in his eyes when he hit the cyclist, a claim he repeated to officers when he was arrested the following month.
Detective Garda Christine Brady told the court that an analysis of Mr Ryder’s lorry found that it had been travelling at 91kph for at least a minute on an 80kph road before the collision. The truck’s tachograph also showed that Ryder had breached the regulatory rest periods lorry drivers are obliged to take.
> Delivery driver who hit cyclist and blamed low sun found not guilty of causing death by careless driving
In a letter of apology to the cyclist’s family, the 27-year-old said he accepts that he “bears the responsibility” for the collision and that if he could turn back time, he would. The apology also added that, while it fades in comparison to the family’s grief, Mr Ryder has also suffered since the incident and has been diagnosed with post-traumatic stress.
Mr Fleming’s wife Ann told the court last week that her and her family’s life had been “changed irrevocably” since her husband’s death, just 22 days shy of their 30th wedding anniversary.
She described Mr Fleming as a “kind, considerate, and good listener” who supported her as she underwent treatment for an incurable blood cancer and through two bone marrow transfers. Ann added of her sadness that her children’s father won’t be there for them when “they lose me to this illness”.
Mrs Fleming also acknowledged Mr Ryder’s letter of apology and said that her family would “not condone a custodial sentence” for the 27-year-old.
However, she said the lorry driver had made a series of poor choices and would have to live with those, before adding that she hoped the court case would act as an opportunity to warn motorists of the need to take greater care on the roads.
Noting that 56 families have already received the news this year that a loved one has died on Irish roads, Mrs Fleming argued that her husband’s death – like so many other vulnerable road users killed in collisions – was preventable, and that if motorists paid more attention this needless loss of life could be reduced.
Add new comment
18 comments
Highway Code rule 237
If you are dazzled by bright sunlight, slow down and if necessary, stop.
The Millicent Rd is oriented pretty much in a north-east to south-west direction. No matter which way the HGV was travelling, the sun would not have been 'in his eyes' at 8:15am on an August morning. Sunrise in Clane on 20th August is 6:16am.
Why do garda/police find it so hard to nail the lies of these F___ers?
Except for the bits where it isn't. Unless my maps are broken there is at least one stretch where, if you were travelling south, you'd be driving pretty much straight into the sun.
At 8:15 in the morning? Back under the bridge with you
Straight into the sun is perhaps an exaggeration, but at that time it would be about ESE, and there are bits of the road which head roughly SSE, so it would certainly be in your face, assuming there's nothing blocking it.
At the given time of day on that date (8:15 am August 22nd) in that location the sun would be at 53° north, so you'd have to be driving at least east-northeast to get the sun in your face.
Graphic representation of where the sun would be on that road at that time and date. Rather than the sun in the driver's eyes I imagine the sun was casting intermittent shadows from the trees on the road. All irrelevant as pointed out by others as the main factors where that he was driving over the sped limit and over the allocated time allowance so probably tired/fatigued, so shouldn't have been driving at all.
..
Surely it doesn't matter whether the sun is in your eyes or not. If it is you slow down to a speed where you can stop in the distance you can see to be clear. This driver obviously did not do that.
Confusingly there seem to be two Millicent roads which cross at approximately right angles, the one that is north-east to south-west is the one shown in the photo above but that is not an 80kph road so I think the photo is incorrect and the lorry driver could be right about the sun, but all the more reason to slow down or even stop.
Speeding isn't careless. Breaking rules on rest isn't careless. Killing someone on a bike isn't careless.
The problem with lenient sentences and "forgiveness" is that it just sends completely the wrong message to drivers who already don't really give 2 shits about us. The only thing that will change motorists behaviour is being forced to suffer cycling on our roads or being scared enough of jail or at least not being able to driver for a long period. Basically. Scare them.
Downplaying the consequences of really stupid decisions when behind the wheel just makes things worse. Its not just about the victims of a particular crime, its about all the future victims of a society that dehumanises cyclists and downplays the danger and deaths.
"Dehumanises"? A relatively small number of very bad drivers isn't society.
...but presumably Matthew Paris, Rod Lidl etc. aren't in court for driving offences, but they're broadcasting a viewpoint which ... is not held to be "extreme" by a large number ("Calling for decapitation? Just bantz, innit? Lighten up, cycling saddos!")
Perhaps that's where you might start to look for a tendency to dehumanise the "other"?
On the role of really bad drivers - where they are recognised I suspect they actually help the majority reinforce their opinion of themselves as careful and considerate drivers. Driving at say 10mph over the limit, or not being pedantic with observation, getting a bit close to a vulnerable road user or overtaking across a double white line? That clearly pales into insignificance next to idiots who's killed someone doing 80mph in a 30 while wasted on drugs and alcohol and not having a licence.
I think many road rules really are seen as arbitrary restrictions (after all - my car can go faster than 70mph!) and essentially something you're unlucky if you are held to account for.
It isn't. But the huge and apparently ever expanding cohort of people, especially in the media, who openly say that they despise cyclists and want them off the roads, along with a judiciary system that appears to regard injuring or killing cyclists as a minor offence, is.
If you cycled regularly you would know that it isn't a small number of drivers that are bad, its just a small number that get caught.
Speeding.
Breech of rest rules
'Sun in his eyes'
If he *truly* "bears responsibility" then he should hand in his driving licence and not drive again.
How very very sad, and how very gracious of Ann Fleming.