At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
There's going to be some fairly serious sales resistance to having a bike with "TRUMPF" emblazoned on the side, isn't there?
'Ridiculous' Oxford car park charges to increase from April...
Up to you of course, but I think I'd base buying decisions for wheels on a bit more research than "what somebody on Facebook said."
Sorry, but Rendel is right. Please don't use such offensive terms. As you say, it's not 1980, when maybe we were a little less aware of prejudice...
I've been using Power Grips for over five years now. They're great.
driverless, car-less......
I already mentioned the strategies that work, which are reductions of motor vehicle usage and lawlessness. For example, Sweden's population has...
It wouldn't matter if it was made last week in China out of plastic: it's still a good enough reason to deny cyclists safer roads.
That's a possibility. But if that were the case, it wouldn't explain how I still get it on Zwift where Garmin wasn't even in play. The power from...
They should bring back dog tax, sorry dog licences. That would fix everything, [sic].