At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
You don't like the Look of it then?
TBF I think their complaint was with the design as proposed. There would be a cycle path with cyclists moving in two directions with little buffer...
With apologies
I'd argue that nothing at all is wrong with the bans that you describe -- and they exist in some places....
In any rational world, there's no debate around this - drivers have not one fact that supports the notion that faster is in any way better for...
You seem to be forgetting the first article in our great constitution. A citizen has the right to store motor vehicles immediately outside their...
Yeah, the number of times I've had oncoming drivers overtake a stationary vehicle - parked car on their side for example - forcing me to hit the...
<pedant>...
I always think that the Pearson font is such a dreadful choice, it's almost impossible to read.
A bit of light rain is all it was on Friday ...