Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Melbourne "dooring" video sparks heated row Down Under

BMW backtracks after worker encourages "dooring" on Facebook; newspaper editorial takes aim at "menace of urban cyclists"...

A video of a cyclist being “doored” by a passenger exiting a taxi in Melbourne has prompted a big row over cycle safety Down Under – with an editorial in The Australian lashing out at “the menace of urban cyclists,” and BMW Australia seeking to disassociate itself from comments made on Facebook by one of its contractors.

The video was shot by a female cyclist who was riding down the gap between traffic and the kerb in Collins Street in central Melbourne – described in local reports as a “cycling refuge” rather than “a designated bike lane.”

As she does so, the rear passenger door of a taxi is opened into her path, with no time for her to avoid the collision.

The 28-year-old, who did not want to give her name, told NineMSN: "I take the risk and I know when I'm riding down there, I go very slowly.

"When I first started riding I was terrified of that lane, but it is the only practical and efficient way to get from work to home."

Following the incident, she followed the man who had opened the door, who called her “a fool” for riding up the inside of the vehicle. Repeatedly asked for his details, he gave the name “John Smith.” The younger of his two companions - all three males in suits - told her to “f*ck off.”

The original passenger, later identified as 65-year-old John Hunter, at one point turns and says, “the way people like you ride around is disgusting.”

According to NineMSN, he later turned himself into police, but was not charged.

An article on car door crashes on the website of Australian cycling advocacy group Bicycle Network says: “Rule 269(3) of the Victorian Road Safety Road Rules 2009 states it is an offence to cause a hazard to a person or a vehicle by opening a car door, leaving a door of a vehicle open, or getting off, or out of, a vehicle.”

Bicycle Network also provides advice to cyclists to help avoid such collisions, saying, “the tips for avoiding this type of crash are the same for avoiding crashes in general – ride sensibly and conservatively to avoid dangerous or risky situations in the first place.”

BMW under fire after Facebook post

BMW Australia then found itself under attack from cyclists after Facebook user Tony Chirinian, whose profile said he was business development manager at the German car maker, posted a message saying: “I vote for starting a new social media craze. DOORING … Start dooring cyclists & upload videos to social media.”

He has since deleted his account, but not before cyclists brought the post to the attention of BMW Australia, whose spokeswoman, Lenore Fletcher, told the Herald Sun it did not “in any way” support or condone the post.

“This individual is an external contractor to BMW Group Australia,” she added.

“Vehicle, passenger and commuter safety is an integral part of BMW’s Corporate philosophy and is a matter which we take very seriously. This issue has been handled internally.”

Bicycle Network spokesman Garry Brennan told the newspaper: “Driving is about how people behave, and our transport system wouldn’t work unless people were civil,” Mr Brennan said.

“(But) people who post things like this on Facebook are really social misfits. They might provoke a lot of anger, but really they’re not gonna have any impact on how people are behaving.”

The Herald Sun’s article highlights how the dooring incident has brought to a head tensions between certain cyclists and some motorists, with several of the latter quoted saying that cyclists should be licensed and pay insurance, and their bikes should be registered.

While feelings clearly run high on both sides, Melbourne, along with Adelaide, are widely viewed as Australia's most bike-friendly major cities, well ahead of Sydney and, in particular, Brisbane.

Newspaper hits out at "menace of urban cyclists"

On Friday, meanwhile, national newspaper The Australian published an editorial that hit out against “the menace of urban cyclists.” It said:

The arrogant sense of entitlement in our inner cities is also evident in the ever-growing number of cyclists snaking their way through pedestrians on overcrowded pathways, darting between cars and clogging-up lanes on our congested roadways.

The problem of city cyclists reached their apogee in Melbourne this week when a cyclist was “doored” on busy Collins Street, after a passenger opened a taxi door and a rider crashed into it. Neither the taxi nor its passenger could be deemed at fault because a narrow “bike lane” inhibited the taxi from stopping next to the kerb. The passenger was lucky to avoid serious injury.

What makes this incident even more absurd is that, although the lane was marked by a bicycle symbol, it was not actually a dedicated bicycle lane. Melbourne bike lanes must have signage, fixed to a pole, that shows the start and finish of a lane, as well as clear markings on the road itself. The state’s bicycle operations officer — yes, there is such a position — admits there is confusion for cyclists, pedestrians and motorists. Cyclists, including the one “doored” this week, are using cameras to film such incidents so they can make insurance claims. The Victorian government imposed even tougher on-the-spot fines in 2012 for people who opened car doors in the direct path of cyclists.

For too long, authorities have bowed to the demands of selfish cyclists and their lobby groups. Truth is, our cities are dominated by cars because they are sprawling. We have no equivalent of Amsterdam and should stop pretending we do.

The row comes against a background of a strong increase in the number of cyclists killed in Australia last year.

In mid-November, with seven weeks of the year remaining, News.com.au reported that cyclist fatalities were already 42 per cent higher than in 2012 and were running a third above the average of the past decade.

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

48 comments

Avatar
Matt eaton | 10 years ago
0 likes

"clogging-up lanes on our congested roadways"

 24

I almost literally fell off my chair.

Avatar
seven | 10 years ago
0 likes

Those guys' response and the opinion piece quoted are just yet more evidence of the "out" group status of cyclists. We are freaks who partake in an activity only freaks would wish to participate in. We are arrogant in our constant and deliberate intrusions into spaces apparently "owned" by other groups (i.e. those in cars and those on foot) and us and our concerns are not to be tolerated. When we get angry we are being selfish and when we do not we are simply in the way.

On the plus side though, the more things like this happen, the closer we get to the supreme illogicality of the anti-cyclist sentiment in countries like Australia, the USA and the UK being exposed and swept aside in favour of a more reasoned discussion.

Avatar
Accessibility f... | 10 years ago
0 likes

"clogging-up lanes on our congested roadways."

What? Is this person actually employed to write such rubbish?

Avatar
severs1966 | 10 years ago
0 likes

The perpetrator was breaking the law, but was not punished. The BMW contractor continues to work for BMW. In other words, the motor industry and the authorities implicitly approve of this behaviour.

Avatar
Tonnio | 10 years ago
0 likes

My actions if I was doored would be to lay on the floor not moving or shout and scream in agony until a large group of people crowd round and hopefully someone would call the police and let them sort it out.

That would stop the offenders from making off witgh out giving details at least.

Avatar
brooksby | 10 years ago
0 likes
Quote:

The arrogant sense of entitlement in our inner cities is also evident in ...

Is it me, though, or do the people driving motor vehicles seem to have a much greater "sense of entitlement" than any cyclist you've ever met?

Avatar
FluffyKittenofT... replied to brooksby | 10 years ago
0 likes
brooksby wrote:
Quote:

The arrogant sense of entitlement in our inner cities is also evident in ...

Is it me, though, or do the people driving motor vehicles seem to have a much greater "sense of entitlement" than any cyclist you've ever met?

Absolutely. Its their defining characteristic (along with 'projection' - a tendency to blame everyone else for problems of their own making).

Avatar
mlimburn | 10 years ago
0 likes

I have to say I would have gone round the outside of the cab, it was the safer route. Just my opinion.

Avatar
abovetheclouds | 10 years ago
0 likes

gotta love it. Australia: where they require you wear a helmet and then door you. how arse backwards is that?

Avatar
Jimmy Ray Will | 10 years ago
0 likes

Looking at the footage, I'd say the taxi driver made an error in not signalling that he was stopping, and the council were also at fault for the misleading road markings.

And then there is the attitude of the cnuts in the taxi.

Avatar
steven miles replied to Jimmy Ray Will | 10 years ago
0 likes

I watched the footage and believed the taxi driver did signal however the "designated refuge" was simply too narrow.

Avatar
gmrza replied to steven miles | 10 years ago
0 likes

My recollection of the footage is that the taxi driver did not use his indicators.

Regardless of that, the area in question is a no-stopping zone, directly at an intersection (traffic lights). The taxi driver would thus not be legally entitled to stop to allow passengers to alight there.

As has been pointed out elsewhere in this thread, there is an ASL at the intersection, so the narrow "lane" on the left is the only way for cyclists to filter forward to the ASL. Interesting, although the "lane" is not a bike lane, it does have the remnants of green paint on it.

Avatar
Leodis | 10 years ago
0 likes

Oz, the UK of the 1970s. Should hear the racism on the radio.

Avatar
Jimmy Ray Will | 10 years ago
0 likes

Again... like last weeks story, hardly an advert for the country is it?

Avatar
cat1commuter | 10 years ago
0 likes

I'm sure that with all their snaking, darting and clogging up roads, cyclists will be the death of the modern city. Not!

Honestly, what "menace" is this that bicycles cause? Maybe a menace to the status quo of car dominated cities.

Avatar
KnightBiker | 10 years ago
0 likes

Yeah i'm a cyclist and want to get doored in a nasty painful way and risk serious physical damage to me and/or my bicycle.
Sigh - these people don't get it.

And even when it's not a cycling path, you still should not be doored at, and you should still be able to pass alongside as driver and passenger should check the mirrors before getting out of the car.

Avatar
Cranky Acid | 10 years ago
0 likes

Is there ever any good news for cyclists in Australia? Seems a bit backward there to me.

Avatar
Quince | 10 years ago
0 likes

I wonder how the cities became so sprawling...

Pages

Latest Comments