A driver who suffers from Type 1 diabetes has been jailed for 15 months for causing the death of a cyclist on the A2 in 2012.
Graham Epps, a 29-year-old IT worker from Canterbury, was cycling home from work when Charles Maxted, 53, hit him with his Vauxhall Meriva on the coastbound A2 at Boughton, near Gate services, just before 7:40pm on August 3 2012.
Mr Epps died at the scene.
At a hearing on September 1 2014, Maxted pleaded guilty to causing death by dangerous driving. He was sentenced on December 22 to 15 months in jail, and banned from driving for 20 years.
Delays while the court waited for medical reports meant it took over two years for the case to come to trial.
Maxted was initially told he would not face prosecution, but was charged after a review of the initial decision not to charge by the Crown Prosecution Service.
At an earlier hearing, Judge Statman said: “On its face, it is a highly unusual and difficult case. It would be sensible to have a complete overview of the medical evidence.”
Maxted initially pleaded not guilty, but changed his plea before the trial got underway.
It emerged that Maxted had been careless with his blood sugar monitoring and had suffered a medical episode while behind the wheel.
Inspector Martin Stevens from the Roads Policing Unit at Kent Police said: "Maxted, a type one diabetic for most of his adult life, had been significantly lax in his daytime testing regime. The sentence imposed should serve as a reminder to all driving licence holders that the consequences of driving when not fit all are truly devastating."
A statement from Mr Epps’ family read: ‘Our Graham's death was most certainly an avoidable one. The ripples of the events from that evening were felt all around the world.
"It is every driver’s responsibility not only to drive safely but to ensure they are fit to be behind the wheel before they drive. In our Graham's case tragically this did not happen. That evening Graham was given a life sentence, no sentence given to the driver involved would ever change the events of that evening.
"However, some things can and must change. Drivers with medical conditions have to be 100 per cent sure they are fit to drive before they get behind the wheel - something that is expected of all drivers no matter what their circumstances.
"A driving license is a privilege, not a right. We ask that all drivers respect that privilege.
"The complacency of one driver’s actions that evening could so easily have been far more severe. So many lives are deeply affected by one such event, lives that will never be the same. We want to prevent this happening to others.
"In Graham's memory, we wish to raise awareness, so that one good thing can come from this tragic event.
"We want to say publically: All drivers with diabetes must check their glucose levels before every journey and not think that it doesn’t matter or rely on that they ‘feel ok’, because it certainly does matter. The consequences of not testing resulted in the death of Graham."
FTFY - but it's a lot less snappy now.
That's a dreadful definition. Hazard awareness is being aware of what everyone around you is likely to do, 5 seconds before they actually do it. If...
Ah - OK. Yes, you're right - the HC is less important than it's maybe made out to be. As you say it is in the driving test. Much of it isn't...
Funny how if I criticise an article I'm portrayed by you as a complete anti road.cc critic, yet there are several comments here without the same
https://road.cc/content/tech-news/canyon-reduces-uk-bike-prices-298821 I'm confused
Your articles are normally spot on in terms of the wording....
Hi all, ...
Hi there, ...
I got my first job in Manchester replacing someone my new boss huffily told had left, "to play his guitar with someone called The Hermits".
What do you reckon the insurance premium is for a newly qualified seventeen year old driving a brand new Audi...?