Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Cyclist asks for consideration on shared use paths after garotting with extendable dog lead

“If I’d been travelling any faster it could have been lethal"...

A cyclist who thought he was being throttled by an extendable dog lead has urged pet owners to be aware of the dangers of shared use paths.

The anonymous cyclist in Deal, Kent, said that he was knocked off his bike and a thin leash garotted him when he was riding along Sandwich Quay at lunchtime on Friday last week.

He grazed his body and ruined his cycling tights.

He told Kent Online: “It was ridiculously long and really thin. I was just riding along minding my own business and, then, wallop!

“Someone did come to help me but the man who was holding the lead walked away. No apology or anything.

“If I’d been travelling any faster it could have been lethal.”

He has pointed out that not only can extendable leads catch on cyclists’ bodies, they can also get caught in bicycles and has asked users of shared paths to be more considerate.

Gary Holmes, vice-chairman of Deal Tri, said: “Whilst riding in mixed environments cyclists should always be vigilant, but I share this man’s concerns about dogs and extendable leads and appeal to owners to be aware of the risks to other cycle path users.”

Back in 2010 we reported a horrific incident involving a boy in Lancashire.

The child, 6-year-old Isaac Hargreaves from Morecambe, was riding close to his home in a cul-de-sac when he pedalled into the lead which was extended to such an extent that the dog was on one side of the road and the owner on the other.

Isaac was caught by the lead at upper chest height, causing a severe friction burn to his shoulder and neck before he fell off the bike, bruising his back

Lancaster City Council, which also covers the Morecambe area, has released a picture of the neck injury to illustrate the dangers of extendable leads. The boy’s father, Darren, also talked to them about the incident which happened during the summer.

"I have always regarded our small, quiet cul-de-sac to be a safe place for children to play," he said "Isaac loves to ride circuits of the road with his brother which is why I thought it was unusual to hear him crying that day. I ran out to find him walking towards me from where the incident had occurred, just metres from my house, with terrible burn marks on his chest and neck.

"Isaac had cycled round a bend in the road and straight into an extendable dog lead. The owner of the dog was on one side of the road and the dog was on the other when the accident happened. The lead appeared to have caught Isaac's shoulder and moved up to his neck as he fell backwards.

"If he hadn’t been wearing his helmet which had cracked on impact, his injuries could have been far worse. Thankfully, Isaac has fully recovered but as a parent, it saddens me to think my beautiful little boy will have to bear the physical scars for the rest of his life."

Add new comment

69 comments

Avatar
Heathie | 9 years ago
0 likes

just goes to show you have to keep your eyes peeled for everything. Dog walkers have plenty of other places to walk there dogs, other than cycle paths even if they are shared use.

Avatar
Stumps | 9 years ago
0 likes

Simple question - how has an extendable dog lead, which i assume was in the owners hand and attached to the dog caused an injury to someones neck ?

Was the dog some giant breed or the owner so tall that the lead, held in his hand was at a greater height. If your cycling along i would assume that the lead would first catch your handle bars or front wheel ?

I may well be wrong but it just doesn't seem to sit right  39

Avatar
notfastenough replied to Stumps | 9 years ago
0 likes
stumps wrote:

Simple question - how has an extendable dog lead, which i assume was in the owners hand and attached to the dog caused an injury to someones neck ?

Was the dog some giant breed or the owner so tall that the lead, held in his hand was at a greater height. If your cycling along i would assume that the lead would first catch your handle bars or front wheel ?

I may well be wrong but it just doesn't seem to sit right  39

My thoughts exactly.

Avatar
Colin Peyresourde replied to notfastenough | 9 years ago
0 likes
notfastenough wrote:
stumps wrote:

Simple question - how has an extendable dog lead, which i assume was in the owners hand and attached to the dog caused an injury to someones neck ?

Was the dog some giant breed or the owner so tall that the lead, held in his hand was at a greater height. If your cycling along i would assume that the lead would first catch your handle bars or front wheel ?

I may well be wrong but it just doesn't seem to sit right  39

My thoughts exactly.

My reaction also, but I have thought about it more and perhaps he was in/on a recumbent cycle. It would also mean that the cyclist is disadvantaged to survey the road ahead.

Dogs on leads and off leads are a liability. I give them the same, if not more space as children, as they are just as oblivious to the dangers around them. Just give them the due care and attention.

Avatar
Beatnik69 replied to Stumps | 9 years ago
0 likes

If the dog had been climbing up a bank at the side of the path it's quite feasible.

Avatar
farrell replied to Stumps | 9 years ago
0 likes
stumps wrote:

Simple question - how has an extendable dog lead, which i assume was in the owners hand and attached to the dog caused an injury to someones neck ?

Was the dog some giant breed or the owner so tall that the lead, held in his hand was at a greater height. If your cycling along i would assume that the lead would first catch your handle bars or front wheel ?

I may well be wrong but it just doesn't seem to sit right  39

Quite easily, if the dog has gone up or down a bank and is at a different level to the owner or if the owner at the last minute has, without any malice, tried to avoid the cyclist by lifting the lead up and over the bike and rider and ended up yoinking the rider off. This second situation could also explain the owner walking off sans apology. If they've realised they've got it wrong and dropped a bit of a bollock they may have just felt embarrassed or had a panic and sheepishly got themselves off.

(However, it was Kent and they do like a bit of UKIP down there, so given that there is a lot of crossover between those type of people and the type of people that are anti-bike, it's reasonably plausible that the dog owner was an aggressive knobber)

Avatar
Sub5orange | 9 years ago
0 likes

If i had been that cyclist that fall would have needed to knock me unconcious before i would have allowed that dog owner in question to walk away without an apology. Dogs have been in my family since i was a toddler. in that time i never saw the need for an expandable lead. my wife bought one for An unknown reason a couple of years ago. it ended up in the bin straight away. most people that i encounter with fhose leads when walking my dog or cycling are unaware of their environment and retract their dogs far too late. Maybe they should spent a bit of time training themselves anf their dogs instead of blocking bridle ways.

Avatar
Jahmoo | 9 years ago
0 likes

I'm sorry, but not a pet lover and a hater of pet owners who don't take responsibility for themselves and their pets!

Lucky it was not me with the neck injury, the guy would not have walked away without saying nothing, I would have made sure of that.

Just goes to show we have to be ready for anything these days, as most of those who are not riding a bike seem to be walking around in a Zombi state with no care to what else is happening around them!

Avatar
kwi | 9 years ago
0 likes

They should be banned, not only dangerous for other people but for the users and animal as well, any dog trainer I have spoken to is quite vocally against them as you have no control over the animal. And one even fears they can kill a small dog if let go.

Pages

Latest Comments